Documents found
-
171.
-
172.
-
174.
Exactitude et bavardage.: Gloses pour une opposition paradigmatique dans la philosophie autrichienne
More informationABSTRACTAustrian philosophy from Bolzano, Mach and the Brentanian tradition to Musil and Wittgenstein is characterised by an obsession : clarity and exactness. Some features of this obsession, in particular the harsh criticisms of different types of philosophical blethering, are described, as is their place within Austrian culture. Each virtue has its vice and the cognitive virtues of Austrian thought are no exception. Four examples of the pathology of exactness are analysed : Freud, Ehrenfels, Weininger and the later Husserl (the German philosopher).
-
175.
-
177.More information
The author, who is also a stage director, reviews in this article three experiments in theatrical adaptation. While tension between text and stage is the rule in the theatre, it is enhanced by a revealing detour through the novel. The author believes he has found, in the three cases which he analyses, three states of adaptation: assimilation by the dramatic form or the full degree of adaptation (The Brothers Karamazov by Dostoïevski); the "bad adaptation", which comes from a crazy desire for fidelity (L'automne le plus nébuleux de Grisoeil by Musil); finally, the impossible adaptation or "loss of adaptability" (Lenz by Büchner). The author draws from these experiences some provisional certainties in connection with theatre practice.
-
179.More information
The factors of domination are numerous and even if they are reduced to objectifiable categories such as âge, sex, economic status, symbolic status, father's profession, the whole in reference to the society where they are applied, they are nonetheless subject to distorting if not schizophrenia effects in an independent Algeria. This is especially the case of the intellectuals, a group given a particularly rough ride and fractured internally by a double habitus(Algerian citizen and French speaker at the same time). Through this study, in which we question ourselves in a self-sociology, we intend to show the particular fate reserved in this context for the language, its usage, and ultimately, its powers of représentation and realization.