Documents found
-
402.More information
This article focuses on the issue of space sharing between different types of inhabitants present simultaneously in cities subject to heritage-making and tourism development. While it is mostly relations between hosts (inhabitants) and guests (tourists) considered as two opposing groups that are discussed, we wish here to apprehend space sharing in a tourist city based on a double capitalistic input. Following a research carried out in the small town of Sarlat (Dordogne, France) and drawing upon semi-structured interviews, two types of capitals appeared crucial for understanding the acceptability of space sharing. The relationships that these inhabitants (temporary or permanent) maintain with others as well as places, if they are intimately linked to their current space-time (within and outside their everyday context), cannot be understood only based on these. The social and cultural capital—in a “Bourdieusian” perspective—and the « indigenousness capital », through the question of attachment to places, allow us to go beyond the binary categorization hosts-guests.
Keywords: coprésence, partage de l'espace, petite ville, tourisme, patrimoine, Sarlat, copresence, space sharing, small city, tourism, heritage, Sarlat
-
403.More information
The status of legal construction may at first appear paradoxical. Although essential, matters of legal interpretation are seldom addressed, except by a few specialists often very close to the sociological jurisprudence or the American Realism movements. The result is a kind of general consensus (which equally serves as a political principle) of the academic community upon the subsidiary role of interpretation in the law-making process – whereby the law-making process is deemed to fall almost entirely into the realm of the legislative branch of government. Yet, this idea that the legislative branch is the sole source of law-making is somehow at odds with the facts. This idea is above all contradicted by a set of works drawn from the philosophy of translation which, in the wake of the “hermeneutic turn” dating from the second half of the twentieth century, has brought to light a different paradigm : the interpreter is not alien to the text, and the idea that he could never add to what the author or the first reader could have had in mind should be denounced ; the text is not a “pretext” or a secondary concern in the decision-making process and should be taken seriously by legal hermeneutics. Finally, the theory of translation firmly rejects the use of the author's intention for interpretative purposes.
Keywords: Interprétation, herméneutique juridique, théorie de la traduction, H.-G. Gadamer, P. Ricœur, G. Steiner, Interpretation, legal hermeneutics, theory of translation, H.-G. Gadamer, P. Ricœur, G. Steiner
-
406.More information
AbstractToday LaNRF is recognised as one of France's greatest cultural phenomena. Immediately after the First World War, the review founded in 1908-1909 by André Gide and his friends was already well on the way to becoming an institution. In this article we shall attempt an analysis of Jean Paulhan's role in consolidating the remarkable success of the review between 1925 and 1940. First we examine how Paulhan arrived at the review, bringing with him the influence of a new generation of avant-garde writers. Thereafter we explore how Paulhan consolidated the success of LaNRF, and finally we shall suggest how he steered the review through the dangerous ideological waters of the 1930s towards the outbreak of war in 1939.
-
407.More information
Anchored in the dynamic logic of « instituting society », the present reflection aims to put in perspective the choices which contemporary societies are facing in response to the double movement of differentiation of the individuals composing these societies: an interindividual differentiation resulting from the heterogenization of their cultural origins in the context more diverse and increasing migratory fluxes; an intraindividual differentiation resulting from the multiplication of the socializing milieus and social networks in which these individuals move. The “ecologization of thought” which substitutes the notion of “organizing complexity” to that of “organized complexity” enriches the nature of the bound between the individual and his environment by integrating a dialogical dimension by which the individual becomes both a product and the producer of the social environment he lives in. It is through the lenses of this transformation of the anthropological gaze that we have tried to interpret the contemporary challenges of renewing sociological theories and community policies.
-
408.