Documents found

  1. 361.

    Prévos, André J. M.

    Comptes rendus

    Review published in Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique française (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 42, Issue 1, 1988

    Digital publication year: 2008

  2. 362.

    Valois, Robert

    L'École des Chartes

    Article published in Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique française (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 7, Issue 2, 1953

    Digital publication year: 2008

  3. 363.

    Léonidoff, Georges-Pierre and Labiau, Jean-Pierre

    Un mobilier sous influence

    Article published in Continuité (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 38, 1988

    Digital publication year: 2010

  4. 365.

    Other published in Les Cahiers des dix (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Issue 63, 2009

    Digital publication year: 2010

  5. 366.

    Article published in Téoros (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 19, Issue 1, 2000

    Digital publication year: 2020

  6. 367.

    Article published in Cahiers d'histoire (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 38, Issue 1, 2020

    Digital publication year: 2021

  7. 368.

    Article published in Bulletin d'histoire politique (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 8, Issue 2-3, 2000

    Digital publication year: 2019

  8. 369.

    Article published in Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique française (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 76, Issue 1-2, 2022

    Digital publication year: 2023

    More information

    How was it determined whether a story or news item about America should find a place in the Mercure galant in the time of Louis XIV? The ordinary internal workings of the privileged periodical remain, unfortunately, particularly opaque. In this article, three points of observation provide an insight into the issues surrounding the publication of these texts. The writing practices of short story writers close to the editor Donneau de Visé, the documentary practices of the Secretary of State for the Navy, and the publication practices of Dutch periodicals are analysed in their interactions with the Mercure. In particular, the author presents the work of writers who adaptated to the expectations of the authorities and that of gatekeepers who decided whether a text should be published.

  9. 370.

    Article published in Romanticism on the Net (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Issue 45, 2007

    Digital publication year: 2007

    More information

    AbstractThe publication of Ann Yearsley's only novel, The Royal Captives in 1795 is an important moment for our current understanding of what it was possible to publish during the political chaos of the 1790s.Yearsley's later career has been largely ignored by critics; her biographer makes only a brief mention of the novel's existence, and few others have engaged with it at all. Yet in 1795, Yearsley burst into novel writing, earning an astonishing £200 from the Robinsons for what would be her only novel. Cheryl Turner has noted that this sum is significant in itself; it was rare for such a sum to paid, particularly for a novel, and few women ever earned this much. It was nearly as much as Frances Burney earned for Cecelia, and was more than Elizabeth Inchbald received for Nature and Art. The first aim of this paper will therefore be to give Yearsley's novel the fullest treatment it has yet received. It will also consider more generally Yearsley's later career, in particular the performance, then publication of her only play Earl Goodwin early in the decade, before placing The Royal Captives in the context of the wider British reaction to events in France. By making use of Yearsley's letters to her friends and patrons in Yorkshire, Eliza Dawson and Wilmer Gossip, in which she relates her thoughts about novel-reading. this paper will seek to create a sense of Yearsley's project as a novelist, and how this engages with national debates. The novel itself will be considered alongside contemporary reviews and more recent critical responses which will provide the context for a reading which aims to demonstrate the fundamental radicalism of The Royal Captives. The paper will then conclude with an assessment of the wider implications of Yearsley's move into novel writing, where it is suggested that a reconsideration of mid-1790s print culture is needed.