Documents found

  1. 191.

    Review published in L'Homme (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 31, Issue 118, 1991

    Digital publication year: 2008

  2. 192.

    Article published in Cahiers de l'Association internationale des études francaises (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 25, Issue 1, 1973

    Digital publication year: 2007

  3. 193.

    Article published in Spirale (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 209, 2006

    Digital publication year: 2010

  4. 194.

    Latendresse, Sylvain

    Mythologie sur papier

    Article published in Spirale (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 196, 2004

    Digital publication year: 2010

  5. 195.

    Article published in Revue de l'histoire des religions (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 200, Issue 2, 1983

    Digital publication year: 2019

  6. 196.

    Article published in Revue Philosophique de Louvain (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 71, Issue 9, 1973

    Digital publication year: 2010

    More information

    As is the case with most of the themes dear to Lévy-Bruhl, the notion of myth undergoes a complete evolutionary growth. This evolution became still more apparent to us in treating of the myth in regard to mystical experience. In Mythologie primitive and L'expérience mystique et les symboles chez les primitifs, it is particularly the social aspect of the myth which is brought out. The myth is reduced to the social element of mystical experience. The Carnets bring up afresh in particular the problem of the myth and Lévy-Bruhl at this point observes that the myth is simultaneously revelation and contact with the beings of the mythical age, and that emotion is far from being absent. What further difference is there between the myth and mystical experience ? The author confesses having lacked clarity. He opens avenues of thought which unfortunately he will not have the time to explore to the full. Two kinds of distinction are outlined. The first of these establishes two chief types of revelation : « tradition-revelation » in which myths are grouped, and « experience-revelation » in which one finds mystical experiences. Within these mystical experiences he establishes a twofold distinction, in summary fashion, at the start of the last Carnet : the mystical experience which is mingled with ordinary experience where facts are present, and that mystical experience which is not so mingled, at least not directly, as is the case with the dream. The myth is held to be closer to this latter type of mystical experience; hence its intimate relationship with the dream. (Transl. by J. Dudley).

  7. 197.

    Article published in L'Information Grammaticale (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 34, Issue 1, 1987

    Digital publication year: 2012

  8. 198.

    Article published in Revue d'histoire de la pharmacie (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 89, Issue 332, 2001

    Digital publication year: 2013

    More information

    Gods, Women and «Pharmacy» in Greek Mythology. The study of Greek Mythology fully justifies Herophilus's phrase : « Medicines are the hands of Gods » (third cent. B.C.). A number of Gods are said to be the inventors of the drugs which are useful to Men. Their names are still alive in the scholarly or popular appellations of a great many Medicinal Herbs. However insofar as the action of a drug (of a Pharmakon) remains mysterious, one finds it in essentialy female practices as well as in Medicine. The study of these ancient beliefs, which have survived in spite of the progress of twentieth century Science, can develop the History and Epistemology of Pharmacy by stimulating research.

  9. 199.

    Krappe, Alexander

    Les Charités

    Article published in Revue des Études Grecques (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 45, Issue 211, 1932

    Digital publication year: 2014

  10. 200.

    Article published in L'Homme (scholarly, collection Persée)

    Volume 32, Issue 122-124, 1992

    Digital publication year: 2008