Documents found

  1. 361.

    Article published in Voix et Images (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 12, Issue 2, 1987

    Digital publication year: 2006

  2. 362.

    Other published in Sociologie et sociétés (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 12, Issue 2, 1980

    Digital publication year: 2002

  3. 365.

    Article published in Laval théologique et philosophique (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 75, Issue 2, 2019

    Digital publication year: 2020

    More information

    Quebec's theological teaching institutions have undergone several changes over the past decade. This article seeks to reflect on the effects of these shifts in theological education in public universities. Of course, social, ecclesial, cultural and academic developments are key determinants in the evolution of the discipline, but the effects of institutional changes cannot be overlooked. In this context, we must ask ourselves how to build a future for the study of theology in Quebec.

  4. 366.

    Article published in ETC (cultural, collection Érudit)

    Issue 46, 1999

    Digital publication year: 2010

  5. 368.

    Trudeau, Jean-Bernard, Desjardins, Pierre and Dion, Alain

    Psychothérapie – Un encadrement nécessaire et légalement reconnu au Québec

    Article published in Santé mentale au Québec (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Volume 40, Issue 4, 2015

    Digital publication year: 2016

    More information

    Until recently, Quebec was the first to have regulated the practice of psychotherapy through law adopted in 2009. The law emerged following 30 years of efforts and inter-professional discussions that led to a consensus by an expert committee presided by Dr Jean-Bernard Trudeau in 2005. In this essay, Dr Jean-Bernard Trudeau, general practitioner, and two psychiatrist and psychologist colleagues, who have participated to the expert committee or have been involved more recently in the implementation of law no 21 in Quebec, relate the main landmarks and moments in the regulation of the practice in psychotherapy following this inter-professional consensus that was translated in the law 21. They relate particularly the last ten years that have led to the adoption of law 21 in 2009, following two parliamentary commission after the Trudeau report. They underline how the practice of psychotherapy is integrated in the professional system and submitted to strict regulation. It includes regulations for obtaining the license of psychotherapist and for maintaining competence. Guidelines emerging from continuous inter-professional discussions for the application of the law and of its regulation in the public and private sectors are produced by the Quebec Professions Office. The definition of psychotherapy that was reached by consensus is not limited to the treatment of mental disorders and is distinguished from other intervention in the area of human relations. Continuous training is mandatory and is implemented on one hand by the Order of the psychologists for the psychologists and other professionals practicing psychotherapy and on the other hand the College of physicians for physician practicing psychotherapy. The authors finally described the interdisciplinary advisory council for the practice of psychotherapy that the legislator has foreseen as an external mechanism to insure the conformity of regulation with the spirit of the law and to give opinions to the various professional orders.

    Keywords: psychothérapie, traitement psychologique, évaluation initiale rigoureuse, formation continue obligatoire, conseil consultatif interdisciplinaire, psychotherapy, psychological treatment, rigorous initial evaluation, mandatory continuous education, interdisciplinary advisory board

  6. 369.

    Article published in International Review of Community Development (scholarly, collection Érudit)

    Issue 15, 1986

    Digital publication year: 2016

    More information

    All scientific production assumes that there exists a necessary relationship between a universal scientific rigor and practical conditions. This assumption involves rational and non-rational postulates of an epistemological, institutional, sociological, political and cultural nature.The development of new technologies has confronted contemporary democratic societies with a new challenge to their capacity to influence, if not control, their own futures. In this respect, it is essential that scientific and technological knowledge be considered as specific social and historical institutions. Means of measurement and quantificantion together with forms of rational coherency are elaborated in response to fundamental questions. The social and cultural relevance of these questions however, is often ignored by the instrumental rationality of established scientific and technical knowledge. This article attempts to show how these fundamental questions can make useful criticism of dominant forms of rationality and how a real interdisciplinary approach can provide fruitful new possibilities for our understanding of the process of global development.