Thorpe, Natasha, Naikak Hakongak, Sandra Eyegetok and the Kitikmeot Elders, 2001, Thunder on the Tundra: Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit of the Bathurst Caribou, Vancouver, Tuktu and Nogak Project, 208 pages.

The timeliness of this work cannot be overstated. Elders in Northern Canada, like elders of Aboriginal people in other parts of the world, are passing away and with them goes a wealth of intergenerational wisdom. Meanwhile, the Aboriginal youth are becoming more fluent in non-aboriginal languages and becoming less directly connected to living off the land. This situation makes it increasingly difficult for Aboriginal youth to learn directly from their elders' experience and wisdom. Land development continues worldwide. In northern Canada this can be seen by the recent increase in mineral, oil and gas development, exploration and extraction. Appropriate decisions on land use practices require an understanding of wildlife resources both from a traditional and a scientific standpoint. Beyond providing food resources, wildlife is a source of spirituality through tradition and ceremony. Wildlife resources are critical to the aboriginal way of life. This work, most importantly, lays out Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit in a completely unbiased and transparent fashion. It provides the reader with the opportunity to evaluate and discover the complexities and specificities of this knowledge about Bathurst caribou. The reader will discover that Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit does not include speculation about other places and things not seen or experienced; it is a very personal accounting. Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit from an individual can be dynamic; increased experience can and does result in changed views by the individual over time, just as increased scientific knowledge changes views in the scientific community. Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit from different families can be quite contradictory. This should not be a great surprise because it is based upon the past experiences of those families with the Bathurst caribou. Both families utilize caribou from the same herd but differing past experiences lead to different conclusions. The ownership of traditional knowledge, the costs to its access, and the copyrights surrounding its dissemination have recently become major issues which could potentially delay the collection of such information. With the current need to assess both traditional and scientific knowledge in the land-use planning process, reduced availability or accessibility of important information may have a negative impact on the process. We need to nurture efforts by local communities, either collaboratively with universities or not, to actively collect and document traditional knowledge. For those who still advocate forcing the integration of scientific and traditional knowledge, carefully read this work. By illustrating in detail the complexities of Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit the challenges of combining the two types of knowledge become self-evident. Both traditional and scientific knowledge have their own merits and pitfalls, each unique to the way the information was derived. Both sources of knowledge are vitally important in the decision-making process. This book is a wonderful example of how traditional ecological knowledge can be collected, documented and shared. The need for collecting such information is pressing given the irreplaceable insight and information which is held by ever aging elders and the constant pressure to develop lands in the north. We need more works following the fine example of Thunder on the Tundra.