Unions in the Time of Revolution: Government Restructuring in Alberta and Ontario by Yonatan Reshef and Sandra Rastin, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003, 279 pp., ISBN 0-8020-8753-1.

Although the contours of public sector labour relations in Canada in the 1990s have received some attention, little research has been done on the qualitative dimensions of public sector unions caught up in state restructuring, or on labour’s response to neoliberal governments. Yonatan Reshef and Sandra Rastin’s Unions in the Time of Revolution sets out to understand “what happens when a government promulgates policies that threaten the unions’ vested interests in job and organizational security, and at the same time shuts the unions out of the political decision-making system” (p. 34). The authors focus on union protest against governments, a phenomenon distinct from routine contract negotiation and administration that usually involves workers across workplace and bargaining unit lines. Reshef and Rastin most often call this “collective action” (a rather specific and narrow use of a term that usually has much broader connotations). Through a comparison of the Ontario and Alberta experiences, their book aims to explore the conditions that encourage and discourage such political protest, its various forms, internal dynamics, effects, and the implications for unions of engaging or not engaging in collective action. It is both an effort to build theory, and a comparative analysis of labour political protests in two provinces where Conservative governments acted decisively to achieve their neoliberal goals. Reshef and Rastin use this model, as well as research that draws on extensive interviews with union officials, to examine Alberta and Ontario provincial public service unions, teachers, the Days of Action in Ontario and the 1995 Calgary hospital laundry workers’ wildcat, and the attempt of some Ontario unions to run a “strategic voting” campaign to defeat the Conservatives in the 1999 provincial election. The final two chapters refine the theoretical model and offer reflections on collective action. Reshef and Rastin conclude that, faced with governments committed to implementing their agenda despite widespread public opposition, union collective action is ineffective and the costs involved may make unions weaker service organizations. That said, mobilizing collective action may help union leaders win reelection. The authors suggest that a more cooperative approach to aggressive right-wing governments may be a better strategy for labour, especially in light of the limited options available to Canadian unions in electoral politics. First, its contextualization of Ontario and Alberta labour relations within provincial political cultures rather than within histories of capital accumulation, state power, class formation and socio-political conflicts and more recent processes of capitalist restructuring leaves much unexplored and unexplained. Second, the authors focus on union officials virtually to the exclusion of rank and file activists and members. At the heart of their theory of mobilization is the question of how official union leaders can persuade members to act, and then control them once they do. This treats workers as inherently passive and incapable of initiative. It is a theory as ahistorical and incomplete as the vulgar radical notion that workers are perpetually eager to revolt, but held back by treacherous leaders. Reshef and Rastin never engage with the relevant theoretical contributions of such researchers as John Kelly and Richard Hyman, or with recent scholarship on leadership and social movements. Third, as a result of their theory, Reshef and Rastin never probe the ways in which the particular legal-administrative framework and kind of unionism established in Canada in the 1940s discourage self-activity among workers. Conservatism and “apathy” are assumed or asserted rather than explained. The authors end up crediting the mass mobilizations of the Days of Action to “union leaders’ proficiency at mobilization” (p. 161). This completely misses the significance of the popular upsurge of anti-Tory sentiment in Ontario, manifested in, for example, the …