<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Érudit | </title><description>2011 N59-60</description><link>http://www.erudit.org/revue/ravon/</link><item><title>Cockney Cities</title><description>Jeffrey Cox 
 						|  :
 						We normally associate writing about the city with a line of continental writers from Baudelaire to Benjamin and beyond. However, there was an earlier account of the city in the writers identified with the Cockney School and in particular Leigh Hunt. Hunt’s Wishing Cap Papers are a striking instance of an attempt to write about the city from the perspective of someone who is, on the one hand, below the circles that control the city, and, on the other hand, capable of imagining a world beyond the city as it exists in the present. While our image of Hunt in the city might begin and end with Dickens’ Skimpole, we can recover behind that savage portrait an engaged city-dweller trying to imagine the urban space remade by pleasure. This is part of the Cockney attempt to create a cosmopolitanism that moves from the local to the global in order to bypass the nation.</description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013265ar</link></item><item><title>Leigh Hunt, Sport, and the Cockney Controversy Revisited</title><description>John Strachan 
 						|  :
 						This essay examines Leigh Hunt’s attitude towards sport, a subject about which he had mixed feelings. On the one hand Hunt strongly denounced violent and death-dealing sports such as boxing, shooting and angling, and on the other he idealised those pastimes which seemed to him to call back a lost world of ‘Merry Old England’: cricket, quarterstaff and bowls. Hunt saw sports as ethics-in-action; to him they offered moral lessons, some malign (the corrupting effects of pugilism) others benign (the healthy influence of the sports of the village green). The essay also examines how Hunt’s examination of sport was made in gendered terms of ‘manliness’ and ‘effeminacy’, and concludes by arguing that Blackwood’s attack on Hunt and the so-called ‘Cockney’ school might usefully be read in the context of the contemporary satirical tradition of the ‘Cockney sportsman’.</description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013266ar</link></item><item><title>Hunt and his Friends</title><description>Daisy Hay 
 						|  :
 						This essay reads Hunt’s  Foliage  alongside works by three members of his circle: John Keats, Elizabeth Kent and Mary Novello. It argues that the work of all three is inflected by  Foliage  and Hunt’s philosophy of sociability, and it suggests that Hunt himself is not diminished when his work is contextualised by that of his friends. Rather, friendship is so central to his sociable aesthetic that we diminish his achievements when, in an attempt to free him from the shadows cast by his contemporaries, we critically render him in isolation. It represents Hunt as a man who was made by his friends, and whose friends were made by him.</description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013267ar</link></item><item><title>Hunt, Byron, and The Story of Rimini - A Literary Challenge to “the Public Mind”</title><description>Will Bowers 
 						|  :
 						This article situates the genesis of second generation Romanticism around the writing, publication, and reception, of Leigh Hunt's The Story of Rimini. It will focus on the period 1814-1816, to find the first expressions of the experimentation which characterise this group. This development has been analysed in Jeffrey Cox's influential Hunt-centred work. Taking a later chronology for his study, Cox claims that these writers were “questing for a position beyond the hegemony of the official culture”. This article disagrees with Cox's positioning of these poets, their works, and “hegemony” (Cox 12). I do not view the poetical works questing for a position “beyond the hegemony”, because of the separation from “official culture” which this articulates. I instead believe that in 1814-1816 Hunt and Byron were constructing poems to confront official culture. Byron's neglected Parisina was written at the same time as Rimini, and I believe that this work was influenced by Hunt. It is a relationship about which criticism is conspicuously silent, preferring instead the “Turkish” tales and Childe Harold.1 This influence provides a reason for Byron's move from the successful tales, to the more formally and thematically radical work of his exile. There will then be a close-reading of both poems’ experiments in genre (the metrical romance) and form (the heroic couplet). The aim is to view Hunt's poem as a confrontation with two established, and establishment, literary modes while appreciating the social repercussions of such a move. The final section will analyse the organs of “public opinion”, by studying the works’ reception in conservative periodicals. The aim of this analysis will be to challenge critical praxis and appreciate the texts, rather than just their authors' politics, as a threat to the newly formed “public mind”.2</description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013268ar</link></item><item><title>"Where shall I place my imaginary coterie?": Sociality and Public Discourse in Leigh Hunt’s London Journal </title><description>Chris Lendrum 
 						|  :
 						In 1834, Leigh Hunt launched the Leigh Hunt's London Magazine with the express purpose of "bringing into public intercourse the same candour and simplicity that are practised between friends in private." While this goal could be considered to be entirely apolitical, this essay suggests that Hunt's desire to establish a close, intimate relationship with his readers is actually an attempt to resist what he felt was the degraded and impersonal nature of periodical literature. By creating a public space in his publication—a coffee-house in print, if you will—Hunt hoped to revitalize the periodical literature that he loved and, by extension, reinvigorate the public discourse that he felt had become stale and unproductive. </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013269ar</link></item><item><title>A Note on Leigh Hunt, Nicholas Carrington, and The Liberal</title><description>Nicholas Roe  
 						|  :
 						Plymouth poet Nicholas Carrington's poem of bon voyage for Leigh Hunt, 'To a Friend, On His Approaching Voyage to Pisa' (1822), marks the beginning of Hunt's journey to join Lord Byron and P. B. Shelley in publishing  the  Liberal  magazine. The poem offers a sidelight on some iconic events of Anglo-Italian Romanticism, and suggest that Carrington's other works deserve more attention than they have so far received. </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013270ar</link></item><item><title>The Religion Of Art, Art For Art’s Sake: Dante Gabriel Rossetti And Walter Pater</title><description>Stephen Cheeke 
 						|  :
 						This article assesses the meaning of the phrase “the religion of art” in the nineteenth century, taking “art” to denote literature, painting and sculpture, and focuses this question in relation to two central ideas: to the Coleridgean “Symbol” (his famous tautegorical figure), and to the conceptual provenance and meaning of the phrase “art for art’s sake” (an apparent tautology). From the former it traces contrasting paths for the idea of the “translucence of the Eternal through and in the Temporal” (The Statesman’s Manual 30). One is via the “art for art’s sake” movement and aestheticism (with close attention to Walter Pater’s writings), drawing upon Romantic Hellenism in order to challenge Christian ideas of transcendence. The other is through the writings of Dante Gabriel Rossetti, in which a relationship is posited between the Victorian poet and his Catholic antitype. The religion of art as it manifested itself in the 1840s and 50s is, I shall argue, significantly different from the religion of art as it emerged in Paterian aestheticism later in the century.</description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013271ar</link></item><item><title>“Glorious uncertainty”: Business and Adultery in Charlotte Riddell’s Too Much Alone</title><description>Silvana Colella 
 						|  :
 						In the 1860s and 1870s Charlotte Riddell was well-known as the “novelist of the City” of London. Too Much Alone (1860), her first narrative foray into the world of commerce and finance, is both a business novel and a novel of adultery. Focusing on how the text configures the emotional regimes of capitalism, this essay examines Riddell’s representation of irregular desires and capricious feelings in relation to what she sees as endemic in commercial society: not fraud, but insecurity and uncertainty, whether “glorious” or dreary. The experience of uncertainty, I argue, provides the point of intersection between the two narrative strands of business and adultery. Explicitly addressed to business people, the novel offers a lesson in sentimental education, a type of training in the ability to tolerate the uncertain, repackaged as an intense emotional experience.</description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013272ar</link></item><item><title>Representing Orality: Scott’s The Lay of the Last Minstrel and Conjectural History</title><description>John Regan 
 						|  :
 						This article contextualizes Walter Scott's The Lay of the Last Minstrel in relation to an Edinburgh literary milieu influenced by some the most famous progenitors of Scottish Enlightenment historical theory. After a preliminary survey of the intellectual landscape out of which Scott's poem comes, the discussion is orientated specifically around the influence, on Scott, of Adam Ferguson's seminal conjectural history, the Essay on the History of Civil Society. Oral poetry is integral to Ferguson's nuanced deteriorationist narrative of human development, and it is my central contention that The Lay is the apotheosis of a Romantic anxiety over the representation of preliterary verse. This article's primary area of interest is not the poetry of The Lay itself but the discourses of history, historicity, verse and versification to which Scott, Adam Ferguson, Francis Jeffrey and several others contributed before, during and after the poem's publication.</description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013273ar</link></item><item><title>“A subject dead is not worth presenting”: Cromwell, the Past, and the Haunting
        of Thomas Carlyle</title><description>David McAllister 
 						|  :
 						This essay examines Thomas Carlyle’s painful struggle to write a book on Oliver
        Cromwell and the Puritan era in the years 1838 to 1845, and seeks to discover why this
        otherwise prolific author found it so difficult to produce a history of the man who occupied
        the central place in his pantheon of heroes. It does so by examining his metaphoric
        conception of the past as a body that could, if treated correctly by the historian, be
        presented “alive” rather than “dead,” and his feeling that the past and the voices of its
        “dead heroes” were haunting him like ghosts. The metaphoric construction and progress of
        this haunting is explored using critical approaches derived from Jacques Derrida and Paul de
        Man. By placing Carlyle’s crisis of authorship in conversation with these thinkers, I
        attempt to cast a new light on his relationship to the past and his sense of the
        difficulties involved in giving voice to the dead. It was only through a subjugation of his
        own authorial voice to that of his dead subject that Carlyle was able to bring an end to the
        haunting that had threatened to silence him in the early 1840s. </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013274ar</link></item><item><title>Parody, Terror and the Making of Forms: Blake’s Aesthetics of the Sublime in The Book of Urizen</title><description>Hélène Ibata 
 						|  :
 						In The Book of Urizen, Blake’s subversion of authoritative discourses includes a critique of Enlightenment aesthetics, and in particular a parody of the contemporary conception of the sublime. At the same time, however, the aesthetics of terror are displaced onto new grounds, as the artist draws attention to creative anxiety and the endless and laborious production process. This new emphasis, we show, is one of Blake’s most significant contributions to the debate on the sublime. As the self-reflexive dimension of The Book of Urizen attests, it is anchored in his own practice and in his awareness of the incommensurability of formal intentions and execution.</description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013275ar</link></item><item><title>Legacies of Tortured Sensibility; or, what Shakira learned from Sade</title><description>Courtney Wennerstrom 
 						|  :
 						Apropos of the title, this essay traces the surprising connections between the        eighteenth-century pornographer and the contemporary Latina superstar’s portrayals of        eroticized torture, as well as elucidates the cultural significance of what I am calling a        legacy of tortured sensibility. By illuminating how the gendered spectatorial        politics of sensibility—particularly in its fetishization of the (female/feminized) body in        pain—continues to inform the numerous interlocking discourses of race, gender, and sexuality        we have inherited from Sade’s Europe, and especially from the early sentimental novel, this        paper demonstrates how the transnational artist taps into a Sadean resistance to figurations        of distressed hearts and flayed skin as sites of geopolitical and individual transcendence.        Finally, examining 120 Days of Sodom and “La Tortura” side by side revitalizes        attention to the ethical crisis surrounding aesthetic voyeurism: where does the anguish of        reading Sade—with his relentless scenes of corporeal torment—go?</description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013276ar</link></item><item><title>
Antoinette Burton. Empire in Question: Reading, Writing and Teaching British Imperialism. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2011. ISBN: 978-0-8223-4880-1. Price: US$94.95/£67.00</title><description>John Plotz </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013277ar</link></item><item><title>
Eric Eisner. Nineteenth-Century Poetry and Literary Celebrity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. ISBN: 978-0-230-22815-3. Price: US$85.00</title><description>Andrew Franta </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013278ar</link></item><item><title>
Elizabeth A. Fay. Fashioning Faces: The Portraitive Mode in British Romanticism. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire Press; Hanover, NH, and London: University Press of New England, 2010. ISBN 978-1-58465-778-1 (cloth). Price: US$55.00</title><description>Christopher Rovee </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013279ar</link></item><item><title>
Timothy Morton. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2010. ISBN: 978-0-674-04920-8. Price: US$39.95</title><description>Tobias Menely </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013280ar</link></item><item><title>
Mary A. Favret. War at a Distance: Romanticism and the Making of Modern Wartime. Princeton: University Press, 2009. ISBN: 978-1-4008-3155-5. Price: US$26.95</title><description>Michael Verderame </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013281ar</link></item><item><title>
Jonathan Sachs. Romantic Antiquity. Rome in the British Imagination, 1789-1832. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-0195376128. Price: US$85</title><description>Suzanne Barnett </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013282ar</link></item><item><title>
Christie McDonald and Stanley Hoffman, eds. Rousseau and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. ISBN: 978-0521515825. Price: US$93</title><description>Fayçal Falaky </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013283ar</link></item><item><title>
Vivasvan Soni. Mourning Happiness: Narrative and the Politics of Modernity. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2010. ISBN 9780801448171. Price: US$49.95</title><description>Daniel Gross </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013284ar</link></item><item><title>
Matthew Rowlinson. Real Money and Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-0521193795. Price: US$89</title><description>Evan Gottlieb </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013285ar</link></item><item><title>
Regenia Gagnier. Individualism, Decadence, and Globalization: On the Relationship of Part to Whole, 1859-1920. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. ISBN: 978-0-230-24743-7. Price: US$85.00/£50.00</title><description>Eleanor Courtemanche </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013286ar</link></item><item><title>
Adela Pinch. Thinking about Other People in Nineteenth-Century British Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. ISBN: 9780521764643. Price: US$95.00/£55.00</title><description>Rachel Ablow </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013287ar</link></item><item><title>
Aaron Matz. Satire in an Age of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. ISBN: 978-0-521-19738-0. Price: US$85.00/£50.00</title><description>Eileen Gillooly </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013288ar</link></item><item><title>
Katherine Newey and Jeffrey Richards. 
 John Ruskin and the Victorian Theatre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. ISBN: 978-0-230-52499-6. Price: $US 90.00</title><description>Sharon Aronofsky Weltman </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013289ar</link></item><item><title>
Paul E. Kerry and Marylu Hill, eds. Thomas Carlyle Resartus: Reappraising Carlyle’s Contribution to the Philosophy of History, Political Theory, and Cultural Criticism. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2010. ISBN: 9780838642238. US $67.50</title><description>David Hennessee </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013290ar</link></item><item><title>
Marianne Van Remoortel. Lives of the Sonnet, 1787-1895: Genre, Gender and Criticism. Farnham, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2011. ISBN: 978-0-7546-6934-0. Price: US$99.95/£55.00</title><description>Natalie Houston  </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013291ar</link></item><item><title>
Carolyn Dever and Lisa Niles, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Anthony Trollope. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011. ISBN: 9780521713955. Price: US$31.99/£19.99</title><description>Steven Amarnick </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013292ar</link></item><item><title>
Stephen Knight. Crime Fiction since 1800: Detection, Death, Diversity. Second Edition. New York: Palgrave, 2010. ISBN: 978-0-230-58074-9. Price: US$85.00/£50.00
Emelyne Godfrey. Masculinity, Crime and Self-Defence in Victorian Literature. New York: Palgrave, 2011. ISBN: 978-0-230-27345-0. Price: US$80/£50.00</title><description>Caroline Reitz </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013293ar</link></item><item><title>
Robert J. Balfour, ed. Culture, Capital and Representation. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. ISBN: 9780230246454. Price: US$80.00/£50.00</title><description>Kathleen Blake </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013294ar</link></item><item><title>
Patrick Colm Hogan, Understanding Nationalism: On Narrative, Cognitive Science, and Identity. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2009. ISBN: 978-081421107-6. Price: US$69.95</title><description>Anne Stiles </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013295ar</link></item><item><title>
Katherine Byrne. Tuberculosis and the Victorian Literary Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. ISBN: 978-0-521-76667-8. Price: US$90.00/£55.00</title><description>Pamela Gilbert  </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013296ar</link></item><item><title>
Mary Wilson Carpenter. Health, Medicine, and Society in Victorian England. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010. ISBN: 978-0-27598-952-1. Price: US$44.95/£31.95</title><description>Michael Brown </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013297ar</link></item><item><title>
Simon Gunn and James Vernon, eds. The Peculiarities of Liberal Modernity in Imperial Britain.Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011. ISBN 978-0-9845909-5-7. Price US$29.95/GB£20.95</title><description>Helen Small </description><link>http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013298ar</link></item></channel></rss>