Abstracts
Abstract
The Google Docs application is part of Google Workspace for Education, a suite of cloud-based productivity and collaboration tools that are now ubiquitous in middle and high school classrooms. While there is an expanding body of research documenting the benefits of using Google Docs to support collaborative writing projects, there exists few qualitative studies detailing how cloud-based tools are integrated into courses that meet face-to-face on an ongoing basis. This case study explores how an experienced high school English teacher facilitated a collaborative writing project, in which students used Google Docs to co-write a story. The students were instructed to work on their stories asynchronously from home and synchronously during face-to-face classes. Data sources included field notes from class observations, reflections written by the teacher, semi-structured interviews with the teacher, focus group interviews with the students, and the shared Google Docs. This article describes affordances and constraints associated with the pedagogical supports provided during the collaborative writing process and offers recommendations for teachers who intend to use Google Docs to facilitate collaborative writing projects.
Keywords:
- collaborative writing,
- face-to-face collaboration,
- Google Docs,
- writing pedagogy
Résumé
L'application Google Docs fait partie de Google Workspace for Education, une suite d'outils de productivité et de collaboration infonuagiques qui sont maintenant omniprésents dans les classes du secondaire. Bien qu'il existe un nombre croissant de recherches documentant les avantages de l'utilisation de Google Docs pour stimuler les projets d'écriture collaborative, il existe peu d'études qualitatives sur la manière dont les outils infonuagiques sont intégrés dans les cours en personnesur une base continue. Cette étude de cas explore comment un professeur d'anglais expérimenté au secondaire a facilité un projet d'écriture collaboratif, dans lequel les élèves ont utilisé Google Docs pour co-écrire une histoire. Les élèves ont été invités à travailler sur leurs histoires de manière asynchrone de la maison et de manière synchrone pendant les cours en face à face. Les sources de données comprenaient des notes de terrain tirées d'observations en classe, des réflexions écrites par l'enseignant, des entrevues semi-structurées avec l'enseignant, des entrevues de groupe de discussion avec les élèves et les documents Google partagés. Cet article décrit les affordances et les contraintes associées aux soutiens pédagogiques fournis pendant le processus de rédaction collaborative et offre des recommandations pour les enseignants qui ont l'intention d'utiliser Google Docs pour faciliter les projets d'écriture collaborative.
Mots-clés :
- rédaction collaborative,
- Google Docs,
- pédagogie de l'écriture,
- collaboration en face à face
Appendices
Bibliography
- Abell, N. (2013). Walking their walk, talking their talk: Coaching with Google Docs to promote better student writing. A Journal of Texas Council of Teachers of English Language Arts, 43(1), 31–35. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1263222.pdf
- Alwahoub, H. M., Azmi, M. N. L., & Halabieh, M. (2020). Computer-assisted collaborative writing and students’ perceptions of Google Docs and wikis: A review paper. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching, 4(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v4i1.2499
- Alwahoub, H. M., Jomaa, N. J., & Azmi, M. N. L. (2022). The impact of synchronous collaborative writing and Google Docs collaborative features on enhancing students’ individual writing performance. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46541
- Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011). The effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: A meta-analysis. TOEFL iBT Research Report. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1111175.pdf
- Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79–99. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/44447/1/20_01_bikowskivithanage.pdf
- Bitchener, J. (2017). Why some L2 learners fail to benefit from written corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implication (pp. 129–140). Routledge.
- British Columbia Ministry of Education. (2018). Area of learning: English Language Arts, New Media 11. https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/english-language-arts/11/new-media
- DeVoss, D. N., Eidman-Aadahl, E., & Hicks, T. (2010). Because digital writing matters: Improving student writing in online and multimedia environments. Jossey-Bass.
- Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V., & Dunsmore, K. (2006). Tenets of sociocultural theory in writing instruction research. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 208–221). The Guildford Press.
- Khoiriyah, K. (2021). Students’ perceived comfort in using Google Docs for online synchronous collaborative writing. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(2), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.2.18.640
- Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
- Liu, S. H. J., & Lan, Y. J. (2016). Social constructivist approach to web-based EFL learning: Collaboration, motivation, and perception on the use of Google Docs. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 171–186. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1087154
- Oxnevad, S. (2012, September 3). 6 powerful Google Docs features to support the collaborative writing process. Getting Smart. https://www.gettingsmart.com/2012/09/03/google_docs_for_collaborative_writing/
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon (MCB University Press), 9(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
- Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. In Quality conversations: Proceedings of the 25th HERDSA Annual Conference, Perth, Western Australia (pp. 562–567). https://www.herdsa.org.au/publications/conference-proceedings/research-and-development-higher-education-quality-69
- Russell, M. (2010). The formation of effective work groups within an FE classroom. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596741003790765
- Slavkov, N. (2015). Sociocultural theory, the L2 writing process, and Google Drive. Strange bedfellows? TESL Canada Journal, 32(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v32i2.1209
- Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.1-18
- Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (2014). The effects of collaborative writing activity using Google Docs on students’ writing abilities. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 148–156. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1022935.pdf
- Vallance, M., Towndrow, P. A., & Wiz, C. (2010). Conditions for successful online document collaboration. TechTrends, 54(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0359-6
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1930/1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
- Woodrich, M., & Fan, Y. (2017). Google Docs as a tool for collaborative writing in the middle school classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education, 16, 391–410. https://doi.org/10.28945/3870
- Zhou, W., Simpson, E., & Domizi, D. P. (2012). Google Docs in an out-of-class writing activity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 359–375. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1000688.pdf