Abstracts
Résumé
Une critique couramment formulée à l’encontre des outils actuariels statiques concerne leur incapacité à éclairer l’intervention, au regard de leurs fondements athéoriques. Dans la cadre d’un effort visant à nuancer cette critique, la présente étude a tenté d’identifier les construits théoriques présents dans la Statique-99R, l’échelle actuarielle de prédiction de la récidive des délinquants sexuels la plus utilisée. Une analyse factorielle exploratoire des items de l’instrument en a extrait trois facteurs : la délinquance sexuelle, la délinquance générale et le jeune âge. Une interprétation de ces facteurs en ce qui a trait aux dimensions psychologiques a été proposée : la délinquance sexuelle en tant qu’indicatrice de déviance sexuelle ou de préoccupations sexuelles et la délinquance générale en tant qu’indicatrice de traits antisociaux et/ou de psychopathie. Les limites et les implications pour de futures recherches sont discutées.
Mots-clés :
- Agresseurs sexuels,
- facteurs de risque statiques,
- facteurs de risque dynamiques,
- Statique-99,
- analyse factorielle,
- dimensions psychologiques
Abstract
The aim of the current paper is to identify dimensions of the Static-99R, the most commonly used sex-offender actuarial scale. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three dimensions from the scale : sexual criminality, general criminality and young age. An interpretation of the psychological meaning of these dimensions was suggested : sexual criminality as an indicator of either sexual deviance or sexual preoccupations, and general criminality as an indicator of antisocial traits and/or psychopathy.
Keywords:
- Sex offenders,
- static risk factors,
- dynamic risk factors,
- Static-99,
- factor analysis,
- psychologically meaningful risk factors
Resumen
Una critica comúnmente formulada hacia las herramientas estadísticas actuariales consiste en su incapacidad para aclarar la intervención, debido sus bases no teóricas. En el marco de un esfuerzo por matizar dicha crítica, el presente estudio ha intentado identificar las construcciones teóricas presentes en Statistique-99R, la escala actuarial más utilizada en lo que a predicción de la reincidencia de los delincuentes sexuales se refiere. Un análisis factorial exploratorio de los elementos de dicho instrumento extrajo tres factores : la delincuencia sexual, la delincuencia general y la edad joven. Una interpretación de estos factores en términos psicológicos ha sido propuesta : la delincuencia sexual como índice de desviación sexual o de inquietudes sexuales, y la delincuencia general como indicador de rasgos antisociales o de psicopatía. Los límites y las implicaciones para futuras investigaciones son aquí abordados.
Palabras clave:
- Agresores sexuales,
- factores de riesgo estadísticos,
- factores de riesgo dinámicos,
- Statistique-99R,
- análisis factorial
Appendices
Références
- Abel, G. G., & Blanchard, E. E. (1974). The role of fantasy in the treatment of sexual deviation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 30, 467-475.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th Ed., Text Revision). Washington : Author.
- Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 84-94.
- Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & Helmus, L. (2011). The RRASOR, Static-99R, and Static-2002R all add incrementally to the prediction of recidivism among sex offenders (User Report No. 2011-02). Ottawa : Public Safety Canada.
- Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Langton, C. M., & Peacock, E. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521.
- Beech, A. R., Friendship, C., Erikson, M., & Hanson, R. K. (2002). The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and reconviction in a sample of UK child abusers. Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 155-167.
- Beech, A. R., & Ward, T. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders : A theoretical framework. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 31-63.
- Brouillette-Alarie, S., & Proulx, J. (2008). Predictive and convergent validity of phallometric assessment in relation to sexual recidivism risk. Conférence présentée au 27e congrès de l’Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Atlanta, GA.
- Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. St. Louis : Mosby.
- Cortoni, F. (2009). Factors associated with sexual recidivism. In A. R. Beech, L. A. Craig, & K. D. Browne (eds.), Assessment and Treatment of Sex Offenders : A Handbook (39-52). West Sussex : John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis : Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10 (7), 1-9.
- Cusson, M. (2005). La délinquance, une vie choisie. Entre plaisir et crime. Montréal : Éditions HMH Hurtubise, Cahiers du Québec, Collection Droit et criminologie.
- Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1774.
- Dempster, R. J., & Hart, S. D. (2002). The relative utility of fixed and variable risk factors in discriminating sexual recidivists and nonrecidivists. Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14 (2), 121-138.
- Doren, D. M. (2004). Towards a multidimensional model for sexual recidivism risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 835-856.
- Eisenman, R. (1982). Sexual behavior as related to sex fantasies and experimental manipulation of authoritarianism and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 853-860.
- Epperson, D. L., Kaul, J. D., Huot, S. J., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., & Goldman, R. (1998). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool – Revised (MnSOST-R). St. Paul : Minnesota Department of Corrections.
- Gardner, W., Lidz, C. W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1996). Clinical versus actuarial predictions of violence in patients with mental illnesses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 602-609.
- Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism : What works ! Criminology, 34, 575-607.
- Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Hallberg, A. M., Lebow, B., Snitz, E. & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction : A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30.
- Grubin, D. (1998). Sex offending against children : Understanding the risk. Police Research Series Paper 99. London : Policing and Reducing Crime Unit – Home Office.
- Guay, J.-P. (2006). Prédiction actuarielle et prédiction clinique : le dernier souffle d’une pratique traditionnelle. Revue internationale de criminologie et de police technique et scientifique, 59, 149-164.
- Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report No. 1997-04). Ottawa : Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
- Hanson, R. K. (2002). Recidivism and age : Follow-up data from 4,673 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046-1062.
- Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1996). Predictors of sexual offender recidivism : A meta-analysis (User Report No. 1996-04). Ottawa : Department of the Solicitor General Canada.
- Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. (1998). Dynamic Predictors of Sexual Recidivism (User Report No. 1998-01). Ottawa : Department of the Solicitor General Canada.
- Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T.-L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision : The Dynamic Supervision Project (User Report No. 2007-05). Ottawa : Public Safety Canada.
- Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism : An updated meta-analysis (User Report No. 2004-02). Ottawa : Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
- Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders : A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21 (1), 1-21.
- Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders : A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior,24 (1), 119-136.
- Hare, R. D. (1999). Psychopathy as a risk factor for violence. Psychiatric Quarterly, 70 (3), 181-197.
- Hare, R. D. (2003). The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (2nd Ed.). Toronto : Multi-Health Systems.
- Harris, D. A., Knight. R. A., Smallbone, S., & Dennison, S. (2011). Post-release specialization and versatility in sexual offenders referred for civil commitment. Sexual Abuse : Journal of Research and Treatment, 23 (2), 243-259.
- Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders : The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
- Helmus, L. (2009). Re-norming Static-99 recidivism estimates : Exploring base rate variability across sex offender samples (Master’s thesis). Consulté le 27 septembre 2012, http://static99.org/pdfdocs/helmus2009-09static-99normsmathesis.pdf
- Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2012). Performance of individual items of Static-99R and Static-2002R. Conférence présentée au 31e congrès de l’Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Denver, CO.
- Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552-584.
- Jackson, R. L., & Hess, D. T. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders : A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Researchand Treatment, 19, 409-448.
- Janka, C., Gallasch-Nemitz, F., & Dahle, K.-P. (2011). Zur Altersabhängigkeit von Risikovariablen bei Sexualdelinquenz. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol, 5, 37-44.
- Jöreskog, K. G. (2003). Factor analysis by MINRES. Consulté le 27 septembre 2012, http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/minres.pdf
- Knight, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2007). Evaluating and improving risk assessment schemes for sexual recidivism : A long-term follow-up of convicted sexual offenders (Document No. 217618). Washington : U.S. Department of Justice.
- Kubinger, K. D. (2003). On artificial results due to using factor analysis for dichotomous variables. Psychology Science, 45, 106-110.
- Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117 (3), 469-496.
- Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism : Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22 (2), 191-217.
- McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., Burchard, B. L., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management : The safer society 2009 North American survey. Brandon, VT : Safer Society.
- Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction : A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
- Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior : A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
- Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence : being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783-792.
- Nunes, K., & Cortoni, F. (2008). Dropout from sex-offender treatment and dimensions of risk of sexual recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 24-33.
- Olver, M. E., & Wong, S. C. P. (2006). Psychopathy, sexual deviance, and recidivism among sex offenders. Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18 (1), 65-82.
- Parent, G., Guay, J.-P., & Knight, R. A. (2011). An assessment of long-term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders : One size doesn’t fit all. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 188-209.
- Percy, L. (1976). An argument in support of ordinary factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Advances in Consumer Research, 3, 143-148.
- Pham, T.-H., & Ducro, C. (2008). Évaluation du risque de récidive en Belgique francophone : données préliminaires d’analyse factorielle de la « Sex Offender Recidivism Appraisal Guide » (SORAG) et de la Statique-99. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, 166, 575-579.
- Proulx, J., Lussier, P., Ouimet, M., & Boutin, S. (2008). Criminal careers of four types of sexual aggressors. In B. Schwartz (ed.), Sex Offenders (Vol. 6, p. 1-21). New York : Civic Research Institute.
- Quételet, A. (1835). Sur l’homme et le développement de ses facultés, ou Essai de physique sociale. Paris : Bachelier, Imprimeur-libraire, Quai des Augustins, no 55.
- Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent offenders : Appraising and managing risk (2nd Ed.). Washington : American Psychological Association.
- Roberts, C. F., Doren, D. M., & Thornton, D. (2002). Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 569-589.
- Ruscio, J., Haslam, N., & Ruscio, A. M. (2006). Introduction to the taxometric method : A practical guide. Mahwah : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters ? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 301-339.
- Seto, M. C. (2005). Is more better ? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 17 (2), 156-167.
- Seto, M. C., Barbaree, H. E., & Langton, C. M. (2002). How should we interpret the results of multiple actuarial risk assessment instruments ? Conférence présentée au 21e congrès annuel de l’Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Montréal, QC.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th Ed.). New York : Harper Collins Publishers.
- Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 137-151.
- Walters, G. D., Deming, A., & Elliott, W. N. (2009). Assessing criminal thinking in male sex offenders with the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 1025-1037.