Abstracts
Résumé
Cet article présente des résultats d’une recherche-action participative évaluant les effets d’un programme d’intervention destiné aux femmes exerçant de la violence. Le programme, développé par une équipe d’actrices des milieux communautaire et universitaire, comporte trois volets, soit la violence, la socialisation et les conditions de vie. L’article rapporte des résultats issus d’entrevues réalisées auprès de 30 participantes avant et après le programme, en lien avec le module violence, dont les objectifs sont (1) de comprendre la violence, (2) de trouver des solutions alternatives à la violence et (3) d’assurer la sécurité des femmes. La majorité des femmes ont acquis une meilleure compréhension de la violence et ont commencé à adopter des comportements autres que la violence. Les résultats et certaines limites observées sont discutés à la lumière de l’état des connaissances sur les programmes offerts aux femmes qui exercent de la violence.
Mots-clés :
- Violence,
- femmes,
- groupe,
- programme,
- évaluation
Abstract
This article presents the results of participatory action research on the effects of a program developed in Quebec specifically for women who use violence. The program, developed by a team of researchers from women’s organizations and universities, has three main themes : 1) violence, 2) gender role socialization, and 3) living conditions. This article, based on interviews conducted with 30 women at the beginning and end of the program, focuses on results related to the violence theme and its specific goals, which were to understand violence, to develop alternatives to violence, and to ensure the safety of women. The program helped most women gain a better understanding of violence and start to adopt other behaviours. The results and some limits are discussed in light of our level of understanding of the effectiveness of programs for women who use violence.
Keywords:
- Violence,
- women,
- group,
- program,
- evaluation
Resumen
Este artículo presenta los resultados de una investigación-acción participativa que analizó los efectos de un programa de intervención destinado a las mujeres que hacen uso de violencia. El programa, desarrollado por un equipo de actrices de los medios comunitarios y universitarios, evaluó tres áreas : la violencia, la socialización y las condiciones de vida. El artículo reporta los resultados derivados de entrevistas realizadas a 30 participantes antes y después del programa en relación al módulo “violencia” cuyos objetivos son : 1) entender la violencia, 2) encontrar soluciones alternativas a la violencia y 3) asegurar la seguridad de las mujeres. La mayoría de las mujeres adquirieron una mejor comprensión de la violencia y empezaron a adoptar comportamientos alternativos a la violencia. Los resultados y algunos límites observados son discutidos a la luz del estado del conocimiento sobre los programas ofrecidos a las mujeres que hacen uso de violencia.
Palabras clave:
- Violencia,
- mujeres,
- grupo,
- programa,
- evaluación
Appendices
Références
- Abel, E. M. (2001). Comparing the social service utilization, exposure to violence, and trauma symptomatology of domestic violence female “victims” and female batterers. Journal of Family Violence, 16(4), 401-420. doi : 10.1023/A : 1012276927091
- Abu-Samah, M. J. (2009). Empowering research process : Using groups in research to empower the people. Dans O. Manor (dir.), Groupwork Research (p. 97-128). Londres, Royaume-Uni : Whiting et Birch.
- Babcock, J., Armenti, N., Cannon, C., Lauve-Moon, K., Buttel, F., Ferreira, R.,… Lehmann, P. (2016). Domestic violence perpetrators programs : A proposal for evidence-based standards in the United States. Partner Abuse, 7(1), 355-460.
- Babcock, J. C., Miller, S. A. et Siard, C. (2003). Toward a typology of abusive women : Differences between partner-only and generally violent women in the use of violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(2), 153-161. doi : 10.1111/1471-6402.00095
- Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T. et Stevens, M. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS) : 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA : National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Repéré à http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf.
- Bair-Merritt, M. H., Crowne, S. S., Thompson, D. A., Sibinga, A., Trent, M. et Campbell, J. (2010). Why do women use intimate partner violence ? A systematic review of women’s motivations. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 11, 178-189. doi : 10.1177/1524838010379003.
- Byczek, S. (2012). Women’s use of violence : An ecological systems model (Thèse de doctorat). Accessible par ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (1285215291).
- Chen, P. Y., Weiss, F. L. et Nicholson, N. J. (2010). Girls Study Girls Inc. : Engaging girls in evaluation through participatory action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1-2), 228-237.
- Cho, H. (2012). Examining gender differences in the nature and context of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(13), 2665-2684. doi : 10.1177/0886260512436391.
- Collins, H. et Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Cambridge, Royaume-Uni : Polite Press.
- Costa, B. M., Kaestle, C. E., Walker, A., Curtis, A., Day, A., Toumbourou, J. W. et Miller, P. (2015). Longitudinal predictors of domestic violence perpetration and victimization : A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 261-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.06.001
- Damant, D. et Guay, F. (2005). La question de la symétrie dans les enquêtes sur la violence dans le couple et les relations amoureuses. Canadian Review of sociology, 42(2), 125-144. doi : 10.1111/j.1755-618X.2005.tb02458.
- Damant, D., Roy, V., Chbat, M., Bédard, A., Lebossé, C. et Ouellet, D. (2014). A mutual aid group program for women who use violence. Social Work with Groups, 37(3), 198-212.
- DeKeseredy, W. (2016). Understanding woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships : The enduring relevance of feminist ways of knowing. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 1043-1046. doi 10.1007/s10896-016-9861-8
- Dowd, L. et Leisring, P. A. (2008). A framework for treating partner aggressive women. Violence and Victims, 23(2), 249-263. doi : 10.1891/0886-6708.23.2.249
- Ferrari, G., Agnew-Davies, R., Bailey, J., Howard, L., Howarth, E., Peters, T. J.,… Feder, G. (2014). Domestic violence and mental health : A cross-sectional survey of women seeking help from domestic violence support services. Global Health Action, 7(1), 25519. doi : 10.3402/gha.v7.25519.
- Fetterman, D. M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation : An introduction to theory and practice. Dans D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian et A. Wandersman (dir.), Empowerment evaluation : Knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability (p. 3-48). Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE.
- Gant, L. M. (2006). Evaluation of group work. Dans C. D. Garvin, L. M. Gutiérrez et M. J. Galinsky (dir.), Handbook of social work with groups (p. 461-475). New York, NY : The Guilford Press.
- Gaudiosi, J. A. (2009). Child Maltreatment 2007. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
- Grills, C., Villanueva, S., Anderson, M., Corsbie-Massay, C. L., Smith, B., Johnson, L. et Owen, K. (2015). Effectiveness of choice theory connections : A cross-sectional and comparative analysis of California female inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(7), 757-771. doi : 10.1177/0306624X13520129
- Grinnell, R., Unrau, Y. et Gabor, P. A. (2010). Program evaluation for social workers : Foundation of evidence-based programs (1e éd.). Oxford, Royaume-Uni : Oxford University Press.
- Henning, K., Martinsson, R. et Holdford, R. (2009). Gender differences in risk factors for intimate partner violence recidivism. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, et Trauma, 18, 623-645. doi : 10.1080/10926770903103248
- Holosko, M. J. (2010). What types of designs are we using in social work research and evaluation ? Research on Social Work Practice, 20(6), 665-673. doi : 10.1177/1049731509339586
- Keiski, P., Flinck, A., Kaunonen, M. et Paavilainen, E. (2016). Women’s experiences of perpetrating family violence : a qualitative study. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21(5-6), 417-429. doi : 10.1177/1744987116653439.
- Kubiak, S. P., Fedock, G., Kim, W. J. et Bybee, D. (2012). Assessing short-term outcomes of an intervention for women convicted of violent crimes. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 3, 197-212. doi : 10.5243/jsswr.2012.13
- Lambo, L. (2018, 14 juillet). We’re not victims : Deconstructing narratives of female perpetrators of partner violence. Communication présentée à l’Association of Domestic Violence Intervention Programs Conference, Portsmouth, NH.
- Laskey, P. (2016). Systematic review of female perpetrators of intimate partner violence and their treatment. Journal of Applied Psychology and Social Science, 2(1), 62-88.
- Larue, C., Loiselle, C., Bonin, J., Cohen, R., Gélinas, C., Dubois, S. et Lambert, S. (2009). Les méthodes mixtes stratégies prometteuses pour l’évaluation des interventions infirmières. Recherche en soins infirmiers, 97(2), 50-62. doi : 10.3917/rsi.097.0050.
- Lawson, J. (2012). Sociological theories of intimate partner violence. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 22(5), 572-590. doi : 10.1080/ 10911359.2011.598748
- Leisring, A., Dowd, L. et Rosenbaum, A. (2003). Treatment of partner aggressive women. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 7, 257-277. doi : 10.1300/J146v07n01_11
- Lietz, C. A. et Zayas, L. E. (2010). Evaluating qualitative research for social work practitioners. Advances in Social Work, 11(2), 188-202.
- Mackay, J., Bowen, E., Walker, K. et O’Doherty, L. (2018). Risk factors for female perpetrators of intimate partner violence within criminal justice settings : A systematic review. Agression and Violent Behavior, 41, 128-146. doi : 10.1016/j.avb.2018.06.004
- Macy, R., Rizo, C. F., Guo, S. et Dania, M. E. (2013). Changes in intimate partner violence among women mandated to community services. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(6), 624-638. doi : 10.1177/1049731513490810.
- Mahony, T. H. (2011). Femmes au Canada : rapport statistique fondé sur le sexe (Rapport no 89-503-X). Repéré à http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-503-x/2010001/article/11416-fra.pdf
- McDermott, F. (2009). Researching groupwork : Outsider and insider perspectives. Dans O. Manor (dir.), Groupwork Research (p. 37-52). Londres, Royaume-Uni : Whiting et Birch.
- Ministère de la Sécurité publique du Québec. (2016). Les infractions contre la personne commises dans un contexte conjugal au Québec : Faits saillants 2014. Québec, Québec : Gouvernement du Québec.
- National Council on Crime and Delinquency. (2001). Evaluation of the RYSE Program : A report prepared for Alameda County Probation Departement. Oakland, CA.
- Paillé, P. et Mucchielli, A. (2008). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris, France : Armand Colin
- Pollock, J. M., Mullings, J. L. et Crouch, B. M. (2006). Violent women : Findings from the Texas women inmates study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(4), 485-502. doi : 10.1177/0886260505285722
- Relais-femmes, Damant, D. et Roy, V. (2015). Violente, moi ? Explorer, décider, agir autrement. Un programme adapté pour mieux intervenir auprès des femmes qui exercent de la violence. Montréal, Québec : Relais-femmes.
- Retraite Québec. (2014). Seuil de faible revenu (avant impôt) pour chaque année selon la taille du ménage. Repéré à https://cdn.carra.gouv.qc.ca/g%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral/pages/IN99KXXX00A001.aspx
- Savoie-Zajc, L. (2003). L’entrevue semi-dirigée. Dans B. Gauthier (dir.), Recherche sociale : de la problématique à la collecte des données (4e éd., p. 293-316). Québec, Québec : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Statistique Canada. (2011). Statistiques sur les crimes déclarés par la police au Canada. Centre canadien de la statistique juridique.
- Statistique Canada. (2015). Programme de déclaration uniforme de la criminalité. Centre canadien de la statistique juridique.
- Statistique Canada. (2016). La violence familiale au Canada : un profil statistique, 2016. Centre canadien de la statistique juridique.
- Steinberg, D. (2008). Le travail de groupe. Un modèle axé sur l’aide mutuelle. Sainte-Foy, Québec : Presses de 1’Université Laval.
- Stewart, L., Gabora, N., Allegri, N. et Slavin-Stewart, M. (2014). Profiles of female perpetrators of intimate partner violence in an offender population : Implications for treatment. Partner Abuse, 5(2), 168-188. doi : 10.1891/1946-6560.5.2.168
- Swan, S., Gambone, L., Caldwell, J., Sullivan, T. et Snow, D. (2008). A review of research on women’s use of violence with male intimate partners. Violence and Victims, 23(2), 301-314. doi : 10.1891/0886-6708.23.3.301
- Tutty, L. M., Babins-Wagner, R. et Rothery, M. A. (2006). Group treatment for aggressive women : An initial evaluation. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 341-349. 10.1007/s10896-006-9030-6
- Tutty, L. M., Babins-Wagner, R. et Rothery, M. A. (2009). A comparison of women who were mandated and nonmandated to the “responsible choices for women” group. Journal of Family Violence, 18(7), 770-793. doi : 10.1080/ 10926770903249777
- Tutty, L. M., Babins-Wagner, R. et Rothery, M. A. (2017). Women in IPV treatment for abusers and women in IPV survivor groups : Different or two sides of the same coin ? Journal of Family Violence, 32(8), 787-797. doi : 10.1007/s10896-017-9927-2
- Van Dieten, M., Jones, N. J. et Rondon, M. (2014). Working with women who perpetrate violence : A practice guide. Washington, DC : National Resource Center on Justice-Involved Women (NRCJIW). Repéré à : https://nicic.gov/working-women-who-perpetrate-violence-practice-guide
- Walker, T. (2013). Voices from the group : Violent women’s experiences of intervention. Journal of Family Violence, 8, 419-426. doi : 10.1007/s10896-013-9509-x
- Willis, J. W. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research : Interpretive and critical approaches. Londres, Royaume-Uni : Sage Publications. doi : 10.4135/ 9781452230108
- Worcester, N. (2002). Women’s use of force : Complexities and challenges of taking the issue seriously. Violence against Women, 8(11), 1390-1415. doi : 10.1177/107780102237409