Cite this article
- MLA
-
Goertzen, Melissa. "Weak Correlation Between Circulation and Citation Numbers Suggests that both Data Points should be Considered when Deselecting Print Monographs / White, B. (2017). Citations and circulation counts: Data sources for monograph deselection in research library collections. College & Research Libraries, 78(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.1.53." Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, volume 14, number 4, 2019, p. 165–167. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29606
- APA
-
Goertzen, M. (2019). Review of [Weak Correlation Between Circulation and Citation Numbers Suggests that both Data Points should be Considered when Deselecting Print Monographs / White, B. (2017). Citations and circulation counts: Data sources for monograph deselection in research library collections. College & Research Libraries, 78(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.1.53]. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(4), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29606
- Chicago
-
Goertzen, Melissa "Weak Correlation Between Circulation and Citation Numbers Suggests that both Data Points should be Considered when Deselecting Print Monographs / White, B. (2017). Citations and circulation counts: Data sources for monograph deselection in research library collections. College & Research Libraries, 78(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.1.53". Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 14, no. 4 (2019) : 165–167. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29606
Export the record for this article
RIS
EndNote, Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
ENW
EndNote (version X9.1 and above), Zotero
BIB
BibTeX, JabRef, Mendeley, Zotero
