Abstracts
Abstract
Objective – The goal of this study was to determine the extent to which evidence synthesis (ES) is incorporated into American Library Association (ALA)-accredited master’s level Library and Information Studies (LIS) programs. The study considered the depth of coverage, interest in additional curriculum content, and preferences for expanding existing coverage.
Methods – A cross-sectional survey was implemented. Program administrators and instructors currently involved with ALA-accredited master’s level LIS programs in Canada and the United States were eligible to participate. Recruitment emails targeted faculty and administrators from a directory of institutions offering ALA-accredited MLIS programs.
Results – 26 eligible responses from 20 unique institutions were obtained. Most respondents reported that ES is incorporated into the curriculum, albeit only briefly in most cases. Most of the respondents expressed interest in incorporating more ES content into the curriculum, specifically as a portion of a course. A greater number of respondents would prefer to bring in external guest speakers to teach the ES content, but a small percentage were interested in training for existing LIS instructors.
Conclusion – In-depth instruction on ES in LIS programs is currently limited. However, there appears to be interest in increasing ES content in curricula, primarily in the form of guest lecturers.
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aamodt, M., Huurdeman, H., & Strømme, H. (2019). Librarian Co-Authored Systematic Reviews are Associated with Lower Risk of Bias Compared to Systematic Reviews with Acknowledgement of Librarians or No Participation by Librarians. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(4), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29601
- American Library Association. (n.d.). Directory of ALA-accredited and candidate programs in library and information studies. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/educationcareers/accreditedprograms/directory
- American Library Association. (2023). ALA’s core competencies of librarianship. https://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/2022%20ALA%20Core%20Competences%20of%20Librarianship_FINAL.pdf
- Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., Porritt, K., Pilla, B., & Jordan, Z. (Eds.). (2024). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
- Bertot, J., Sarin, L., & Jaeger, P. (2015). Re-envisioning the MLS: The future of librarian education. Public Libraries, 54(6), 23-33.
- Beverley, C. A., Booth, A., & Bath, P. A. (2003). The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: A health information case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 20(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-1842.2003.00411.x
- Blanco, M. A., Capello, C. F., Dorsch, J. L., Perry, G., & Zanetti, M. L. (2014). A survey study of evidence-based medicine training in US and Canadian medical schools. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 102(3), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.005
- Boice, J. (2019). An exploration of systematic review publication trends in conservation biology journals. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 91. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2
- Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2015). What is the state of the art of systematic reviewing in engineering education? Journal of Engineering Education, 104(2), 212–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20069
- Bright, K. M., & Colón-Aguirre, M. (2022). Prepare to be unprepared? LIS curriculum and academic liaison preparation. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(6), 102602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102602
- Canadian Association of Research Libraries Competencies Working Group. (2020). Competencies for librarians in Canadian research libraries. https://www.carl-abrc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Competencies-Final-EN-1-2.pdf
- Chalmers, I., Hedges, L. V., & Cooper, H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 25(1), 12–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278702025001003
- Champion, C. (2018). Response to “Environmental scan and evaluation of best practices for online systematic review resources.” Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.496
- Chapman, K. (2021). Characteristics of systematic reviews in the social sciences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102396
- Chung, E., Schalk, J., & Yoon, J. (2022). How have LIS school curricula evolved over the past twenty years? Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.14192
- Davis, R., & Saunders, L. (2020). Essential skills for corporate and special librarians. Journal of Library Administration, 60(7), 762–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1786984
- Desmeules, R., Dorgan, M., & Campbell, S. (2016). Acknowledging librarians’ contributions to systematic review searching. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 37(2), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-014
- Dodson, M. (2020). On target or missing the mark? Instruction courses in LIS graduate programs. Public Services Quarterly, 16(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2020.1745131
- Institute of Medicine. (2011). Finding what works in health care: Standards for systematic reviews. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13059
- Eldermire, E., & Young, S. (2022). World of reviews. In M. J. Foster & S. T. Jewell (Eds.), Piecing Together Systematic Reviews and Other Evidence Syntheses (pp. 17–30). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Evidence Synthesis Institute. (n.d.). Systematic reviews and evidence synthesis beyond the health sciences [Online course]. Retrieved April 26, 2024, from https://pressbooks.umn.edu/evidencesynthesisinstitute/
- Eysenbach, G. (2004). Improving the quality of web surveys: The checklist for reporting results of Internet e-surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
- Fehrmann, P., & Thomas, J. (2011). Comprehensive computer searches and reporting in systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 2(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.31
- Ghezzi‐Kopel, K., Ault, J., Chimwaza, G., Diekmann, F., Eldermire, E., Gathoni, N., Kelly, J., Kinengyere, A. A., Kocher, M., & Lwoga, E. T. (2021). Making the case for librarian expertise to support evidence synthesis for the sustainable development goals. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1528
- Higgins, J., Lasserson, T., Thomas, J., Flemyng, E., & Churchill, R. (2023). Methodological expectations of Cochrane intervention reviews (MECIR). Cochrane. https://community.cochrane.org/mecir-manual
- Hong, Q. N., & Pluye, P. (2018). Systematic reviews: A brief historical overview. Education for Information, 34(4), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180219
- Kallaher, A., Eldermire, E. R. B., Fournier, C. T., Ghezzi-Kopel, K., Johnson, K. A., Morris-Knower, J., Scinto-Madonich, S., & Young, S. (2020). Library systematic review service supports evidence-based practice outside of medicine. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(6), 102222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102222
- Koffel, J. B. (2015). Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: A cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PLOS One, 10(5), e0125931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125931
- Kogut, A., Foster, M., Ramirez, D., & Xiao, D. (2019). Critical appraisal of mathematics education systematic review search methods: Implications for social sciences librarians. College & Research Libraries, 80(7), 973. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.7.973
- Kogut, A., Ramirez, D., & Foster, M. J. (2022). Systematic review training model for education librarians: A case study. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 28(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1784761
- Koizumi, M., & Widdersheim, M. M. (2019). Specialties and strategies in academic libraries: A cluster analysis approach. Library Management, 40(1–2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-10-2017-0114
- Kousha, K., & Abdoli, M. (2008). Subject analysis of online syllabi in library and information science: Do academic LIS programs match with job requirements? IFLA Conference Proceedings, 1–13.
- Lê, M., Winkler, J., & Neilson, C. (2024). Benchmarking Librarian Support of Systematic Reviews in the Sciences, Humanities, and Social Sciences. College & Research Libraries, 85(4). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.4.606
- Lê, M., Winkler, J., & Neilson, C. (2023). Training needs and preferences for librarians supporting systematic reviews in the sciences, humanities, and social sciences. OSF. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/e573s
- Lund, B., Wang, T., Widdersheim, M., & Fay, B. (2023). Interrogating shortcomings in instructional librarianship preparation: A comparison of perspectives of employers, LIS educators, and instructional librarians. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 64(2), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis-2020-0038
- Marsalis, S. (2020, January 18). Adoption of systematic and related review methods in social work and reporting quality of underpinning searches. Society for Social Work and Research Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
- McGowan, J., & Sampson, M. (2005). Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(1), 74–80. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15685278
- Meert, D., Torabi, N., & Costella, J. (2016). Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 104(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.004
- Methods Group of the Campbell Collaboration. (2019). Methodological expectations of Campbell Collaboration Intervention reviews: Conduct standards. Campbell Collaboration. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/pb-assets/Campbell%20MECCIR%20Conduct%20standards%20Nov2019-1573120397657.docx
- Pandolfelli, G., Koos, J. A., & Benz Scott, L. (2022). An analysis of ALA‐accredited MLS curricula indicates deficiencies in the initial training provided for public librarians. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 39(3), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12443
- Parker, R. M. N., Boulos, L., Visintini, S., Ritchie, K., & Hayden, J. (2018). Environmental scan and evaluation of best practices for online systematic review resources. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.241
- Patsopoulos, N. A. (2005). Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA, 293(19), 2362. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.19.2362
- Pawliuk, C., Cheng, S., Zheng, A., & Siden, H. (Hal). (2024). Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 166, 111237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111237
- Premji, Z., Hayden, K. A., & Rutherford, S. (2021). Teaching knowledge synthesis methodologies in a higher education setting: A scoping review of face-to-face instructional programs. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 16(2), 111–144. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29895
- Premji, Z., Splenda, R., & Young, S. (2022). An exploration of business librarian participation in knowledge synthesis reviews. College & Research Libraries, 83(2), 314–336. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.2.314
- Reed, J. B., & Carroll, A. J. (2020). Roles for health sciences librarians at college and university libraries. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (94). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl42
- Rethlefsen, M. L., Farrell, A. M., Osterhaus Trzasko, L. C., & Brigham, T. J. (2015). Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(6), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025
- Rod, A. B. (2023). It takes a researcher to know a researcher: Academic librarian perspectives regarding skills and training for research data support in Canada. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 18(2), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30297
- Royle, P., Kandala, N.-B., Barnard, K., & Waugh, N. (2013). Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: Analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors. Systematic Reviews, 2(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-74
- Saunders, L. (2019). Core and more: Examining foundational and specialized content in library and information science. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 60(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis.60.1.2018-0034
- Smith, N. M., & Warner, H. L. (1990). Educating future librarians: The library school perspective. Journal of Library Administration, 11(3–4), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v11n03_04
- Spencer, A. J., & Eldredge, J. D. (2018). Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: A scoping review. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.82
- Stanton, J. M., Kim, Y., Oakleaf, M., Lankes, R. D., Gandel, P., Cogburn, D., & Liddy, E. D. (2011). Education for eScience professionals: Job analysis, curriculum guidance, and program considerations. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 52(2), 79–94. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41308884
- Thomas, C., & Urban, R. (2018). What do data librarians think of the MLIS? Professionals’ perceptions of knowledge transfer, trends, and challenges. College & Research Libraries, 79(3), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.3.401
- Townsend, W. A., Anderson, P. F., Ginier, E. C., MacEachern, M. P., Saylor, K. M., Shipman, B. L., & Smith, J. E. (2017). A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 105(3), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.189
- Valenti, S., & Lund, B. (2021). Preparing the instructional librarian: Representation of ACRL roles and strengths in MLS course descriptions. College & Research Libraries, 82(4), 530. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.4.530
- Valentine, J. C., Littell, J. H., & Young, S. (Eds.). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: A Campbell Collaboration online course. Open Learning Initiative, (2022). https://oli.cmu.edu/courses/systematic-reviews-and-meta-analysis/
- Williams, R. D., & Saunders, L. (2020). What the field needs: Core knowledge, skills, and abilities for public librarianship. The Library Quarterly, 90(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1086/708958
- Xu, J., Kang, Q., & Song, Z. (2015). The current state of systematic reviews in library and information studies. Library & Information Science Research, 37(4), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2015.11.003