This special issue of Ethnologies explores the interrelated themes of language and culture, and particularly how language and culture contribute to self-definition in local, regional, national and global contexts. The contributors approach these themes from the perspectives of ethnomusicology, Canadian studies, cultural anthropology, and linguistics. Their topical foci range from Celtic, Métis and Iroquoian music, to minority language issues affecting French and Ukrainian Canadians in Alberta and Muslims in Northern Ireland, the feminization of job titles in Québec and France, and language ideologies among Muinane of the Colombian Amazon. The authors use ethnographic, ethnohistorical and archival methods to obtain their data, and exegetical analysis of key texts and cultural performances to derive insights into patterns of language use and identity formation. They contextualize these patterns within particular communities, make comparisons with other communities and use theoretical frameworks which are broadly sociolinguistic and postmodern. A recent review article by Duranti (2003) identifies three paradigms in scholarship pertaining to the relationship of language and culture. The first — associated primarily with Boas (1911, 1942), Sapir (1924, 1949) and Whorf (1956) — has roots stretching back at least to German Idealism and Romanticism (Chomsky 1966) and focuses on the relationship between grammar and worldview. The second grows from the work of Gumperz and Hymes (1964) on the ethnography of communication and emphasizes pragmatic aspects of language use. The third and most eclectic paradigm explores the role of language in identity formation. Butler’s (1990) work on performativity, Woolard and Schieffelin’s (1994) study of language ideology, and Trechter and Bucholtz’s (2001) analysis of hegemony and race are all examples of the third paradigm. The contributors to this volume nearly all fall within the eclectic third paradigm. However, as Duranti remarks, “paradigms do not die” and “researchers have had no difficulty moving back and forth from one paradigm to another” (2003: 333-334). Indeed, by its very nature, the third paradigm transcends the boundaries between grammar and pragmatics that are implicit in the other two paradigms. Thus, it is no surprise that the following articles are ultimately a mix of all three paradigms, seeking what Spitulnik characterizes as “a breakthrough into a different kind of relationship” (2003: 339). This relationship between language and culture is integrative, local and counter-hegemonic, yet embedded in an increasingly global discourse. Two of the contributors to this issue have explored the issue of francophone minorities in Canada. Their research is highly original, departing from the tendency of our mainstream press to continually juxtapose the language policies of Québec with those of the rest of Canada. In her exploration of the tensions between the desire to foster athletic performance versus francophoneness at the Alberta Francophone Games (AFG), Christine Dallaire observes “[o]rganizers generally acknowledged that the sport agenda was dominating the process of staging the AFG.” Reasons for this included organizers’ desire to gain credibility from sports funding agencies that target funds based exclusively on athletic performance, to attract high-performance bilingual and monolingual English athletes from the dominant (Anglophone) community, to depoliticize and dehistoricize the event, and to focus on technical management issues rather than confronting the problem of how to reverse the ongoing decline in the number of francophones in Alberta. In this way, “the focus of the AFG slid from promoting francophoneness to the staging of a large competitive sporting event.” Nevertheless, Dallaire ends her article on a positive note. She suggests that by expanding the number of certified francophone coaches and sports officials in Alberta, AFG organizers may one day resolve the apparent contradiction between sporting excellence and francophoneness in their province. In her research note on Protestant francophones in Québec, …
Appendices
References
- Boas, Franz. 1911. “Introduction.” In Franz Boas, ed., Handbook of American Indian Languages. Bureau of American EthnologyBulletin 40. Washington, Government Printing Office: 5-89.
- –––––. 1942. “Language and Culture.” Studies in the History of Culture. Menasha (WI), Banta Publishing: 178-84.
- Brown, Jennifer S. H. 1988. “Métis.” The Canadian Encyclopedia (second edition). Vol. 2: 1343-46.
- Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper and Row.
- Dorian, Nancy C. 1981. Language Death: The Life Cycle of a Scottish Gaelic Dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Duranti, Alessandro. 2003. “Language as Culture in U.S. Anthropology.” Current Anthropology 44 (3): 323-47.
- Feld, Steven. 1982. Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Feld, Steven and Aaron A. Fox. 1994. “Music and Language.” Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 25-53.
- Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Religion as a Cultural System.” The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, Basic Books: 87-125.
- –––––. 2003. “Which Way to Mecca.” New York Review of Books 50 (10-11).
- Gumperz, John H. and Dell H. Hymes, eds. 1964. The Ethnography of Communication. American Anthropologist 66, Special Publication. Washington: American Anthropological Association.
- Iwanicki, Christine. 2003. “Living Out Loud within the Body of the Letter: Theoretical Underpinnings of the Materiality of Language.” College English 65 (5): 494-510.
- Magne, Frank. 1991. “Language and Culture Debate.” Anthropology Today 8 (4): 17-18.
- Nicks, Trudy. 1996. “Dr. Oronhyatekha’s History Lessons: Reading Museum Collections as Texts.” In Jennifer S. H. Brown and Elizabeth Vibert, eds., Reading Beyond Words: Contexts for Native History. Peterborough (ON), Broadview Press: 483-508.
- Said, Edward. 2003. “The Academy of Logado.” London Review of Books 25 (8).
- Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
- –––––. 1949. The Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description.” In Keith H. Basso and Henry A. Selby eds., Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press: 11-55.
- –––––. 1979. “Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology.” In Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks and Carol L. Hofbauer, eds., The Elements: a Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago: 193-247.
- –––––. 1993. “Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function.” In John A. Lucy ed., Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 33-58.
- Spitulnik, Debra. 2003. “Comments on Language as Culture in U.S. Anthropology by Alessandro Duranti.” Current Anthropology, 44 (3): 339-40.
- Stevenson, Winona. 1996. “The Journals and Voices of a Church of England Native Catechist: Askenootow (Charles Pratt), 1851-1884.” In Jennifer S. H. Brown and Elizabeth Vibert eds., Reading Beyond Words: Contexts for Native History. Peterborough (ON), Broadview Press: 305-329.
- Trechter, Sara and Mary Bucholtz eds. 2001. Discourses on Whiteness.Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 11 (1).
- Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (John B. Carroll, ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Woolard, Kathryn A. and Bambi B. Schieffelin. 1994. “Language Ideology.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 23: 55-82.