Online learning is increasingly being used in K-12 learning environments. A concomitant trend is found towards learning becoming authentic as students learn with tasks that are connected to real-world occupations. In this study, 48 pre-service teachers use an online environment to engage in authentic practice as they developed online learning experiences for their future students. Using a design-based research methodology, the researchers were involved in planning, designing, implementing, and evaluating the higher education class across two macro cycles. An authentic learning framework was utilized in the development of the class. Findings explicate the design of the course and how it aligned to the authentic learning framework. It appears that web-based tools were beneficial as the pre-service teachers designed their own K-12 online classes. Findings show that the pre-service teachers' comfort increased when using the using online web building applications in the authentic environment. Furthermore, a high level of engagement in reflective and collaborative learning was uncovered during the activities. This research acts as a springboard for educators who are interested in designing online higher education courses incorporating authentic learning experiences.
- authentic learning,
- Web 2.0,
- teacher education,
- online teaching
- Amory, A. (2014). Toll-mediated authentic learning in an educational technology course: A design-based innovation. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 497-513.
- Archambault, L., Debruler, K., & Friedhoff, J. R. (2014). K-12 online and blended teacher licensure: Striking a balance between policy and preparedness. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 83-106.
- Behizadeh, N., & Fink, L. S. (2015). Engaging students through authentic and effective literacy instruction. Voices from the Middle, 23(1), 40-50.
- Bjekic, D., Krneta, R., & Milosevic, D. (2010). Teacher education from e-learner to e-teacher: Master curriculum. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 9(1), 202-212.
- Blackwell, P. J., Futrell, M. H., & Imig, D. G. (2003). Burnt water paradoxes of schools of education. Phi Delta Kappa, 85(5), 356-361.
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
- Cusworth, R., & Whiting, P. (1994). Beginning teachers' attitudes to preservice training. Paper presented at Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Newcastle, UK.
- Demiray, U. (2011). Distance education and eLearning practices: In Turkey and Eastern countries. OpenEducationEuropa . Retrieved from https://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/article/Distance-education-and-eLearning-practices%3A-In-Turkey-and-Eastern-countries#main-content
- El-Ghareeb, H., & Riad, A. (2011). Empowering adaptive lectures through activation of intelligent and web 2.0 technologies. International Journal on E-Learning, 10(4), 365-391.
- Florida, R., Kaimal, G., Oblinger, D., & Blessing. L. (2003). How generations X and Y (Millenials) will reshape higher education. Society for College and University Planning Virtual Seminar.
- Gulikers, J., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67-86.
- Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48.
- Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59-71.
- Holotescu, C. & Grosseck, G. (2009). Using microblogging in education. Case study: Cirip.ro. Paper presented at the 6th Conference on e-Learning Applications, Cairo, Egypt.
- Hossainy, F. N., Zare, H., Hormozi, M., Shaghaghi, F., & Kaveh, M. H. (2012). Designing and implementing a situated learning program and determining its impact on the students' motivation and learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 36-47.
- International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNOCOL). (2013). Fast facts about online learning [PDF]. Retrieved from http://www.inacol.org/resource/fast-facts-about-online-learning/
- Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2012a). Offering pre-service teachers field experiences in K-12 online learning: A national survey of teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 185-200.
- Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2012b). Design and development of field experiences in K-12 online learning environments. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 2(1), 35-49.
- Kreber, C., Klampfleitner, M., McCune, V., Bayne, S., & Knottenbelt. (2007). What do you mean by "Authentic"? A comparative review of the literature on conceptions of authenticity in teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 58(1), 22-43.
- Latham, G., & Carr, N. (2012a). Authentic learning for pre-service teachers in a technology-rich environment. Journal of Learning Design, 8(3), 65-66.
- Latham, G., & Carr, N. (2012b). Building on authentic Learning for Pre-Service Teachers in a Technology-Rich Environment. Journal of Learning Design, 5(1), 32-42.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Liu, F., & Cavanaugh, C. (2011). High enrolment course success factors in virtual school: Factors influencing student academic achievement. International Journal on E-Learning, 10(4), 393-418.
- Luo, T., & Gao, F. (2012). Enhancing classroom learning experience by providing structures to microblogging-based activities. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 199-211.
- Martens, R. L., Gulikers, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2004). The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(5), 368-376.
- Middleton, J., Gorard, S., Taylor, C., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2008). The "complete "design experiment: from soup to nuts. In A.E. Kelly, R.A. Lesh, & J.Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: innovations in science, technology, engineering and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 21-46). New York and Oxford: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
- Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1993). Educational leadership: Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8-12.
- Slavkin, M. L. (2004). Authentic learning: How learning about the brain can shape the development of students. Toronto: ScarecrowEducation.
- Snape, P., & Fox-Turnbull, W. (2013). Perspectives of authenticity: Implementation in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 51-68.
- Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
- Teräs, H., Teräs, M., & Herrington, J. (2012). A reality check: Taking authentic e-learning from design to implementation. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2012 (pp. 2219-2228). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
- Turnbull, W. (2002). The place of authenticity in technology in the New Zealand curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12, 23-40.
- Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.