Abstracts
Abstract
Although collaboration skills are highly valued by employers, convincing students that collaborative learning activities are worthwhile, and ensuring that the experience is both useful and enjoyable, are significant challenges for educators. This paper addresses these challenges by exploring students’ and tutors’ experiences of a group project where part-time distance learners collaborate online to create a website. Focus groups were conducted with students who had recently completed the project, and discussion forums were used to gather feedback from tutors who supported students and marked their group work. The research showed that students’ attitudes towards the group project on completion were generally favourable. Findings highlighted key aspects for successful online group projects and for motivating students to participate fully. These included: the design of authentic tasks, with skills development relevant to the workplace; careful attention to how the group work is assessed; and enabling students to develop websites they could be proud of. Frustrations for students were associated with the lack of engagement of fellow students and with limitations of the tool provided for building the website. Tutors found marking the work a time-consuming and complex process. Tutors were also unconvinced of the value and fairness of assessing students partly on a group, as opposed to an individual, basis.
Keywords:
- collaboration,
- online learning,
- group projects,
- authentic learning,
- assessment
Appendices
Bibliography
- Allan, J., & Lawless, N. (2003). Stress caused by on-line collaboration in e-learning: A developing model. Education + Training, 45(8/9), 564-572. doi: 10.1108/00400910310508955
- Amory, A. (2014). Tool-mediated authentic learning in an educational technology course: A designed-based innovation. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 497-513. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2012.682584
- Brindley, J. E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L.M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001032
- Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Donlan, L. (2014). Exploring the views of students on the use of Facebook in university teaching and learning. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), 572-588. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2012.726973
- Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2010). A guide to authentic elearning. New York: Routledge.
- Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52, 78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009
- Huang, H-M. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 27-37. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00236
- Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., Williams, J., & Donelan, H. (2010). Web conferencing for synchronous online tutorials: Perspectives of tutors using a new medium. Computers & Education, 58, 953-963. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.015
- Kear, K., Donelan, H., & Williams, J. (2014). Using wikis for online group projects: student and tutor perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(4), 70-90. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i4.1753
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Lin, C.-Y., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2016). Scaffolding wiki-supported collaborative learning for small-group projects and whole-class collaborative knowledge building. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 529-547. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12140
- Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause Learning Initiative. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2007/1/authentic-learning-for-the-21st-century-an-overview
- McConnell, D. (2005). Examining the dynamics of networked e-learning groups and communities. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 25-42. doi: 10.1080/0307507052000307777
- McConnell, D. (2006). E-learning groups and communities. Berkshire: Open University Press.
- McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut, & C. Egido. (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.
- Myers, S. A., Bogdan, L. M., Eidsness, M. A., Johnson, A. N., Schoo, M. E., Smith, N. A., ... & Zackery, B. A. (2009). Taking a trait approach to understanding college students' perceptions of group work. College Student Journal, 43(3), 822-831.
- Naismith, L., Lee, B. H., & Pilkington, R. M. (2011). Collaborative learning with a wiki: Differences in perceived usefulness in two contexts of use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 228-242. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00393.x
- Oliveira, I., Tinoca, L., & Pereira, A. (2011). Online group work patterns: How to promote a successful collaboration. Computers & Education, 57, 1348-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.017
- Oliver, R., Herrington, A., Herrington, J., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Representing authentic learning designs supporting the development of online communities of learners. Journal of Learning Design, 2(2), 1-21. doi: 10.5204/jld.v2i2.36
- Ozturk, T. H., & Hodgson, V. (2017). Developing a model of conflict in virtual learning communities in the context of a democratic pedagogy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 23-42. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12328
- Payne, B. K., Monk-Turner, E., Smith, D., & Sumter, M. (2006). Improving group work: Voices of students. Education, 146(3), 441−448.
- Roberts, T. S. & McInnerney, J. M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 257-268.
- Sclater, N., Peasgood, A., & Mullen, J. (2016) Learning analytics in higher education: A review of UK and international practice. Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/learning-analytics-in-he-v3.pdf
- Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students' education-related use of facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157-174. doi: 10.1080/17439880902923622
- Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. doi: 0.3102/0013189X027002004
- Smith, G. G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A. J., Caris, M., & Martinez, C.D. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to group work: Online versus face-to-face. Internet and Higher Education, 14, 121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.005
- Strauss, P., U-Mackey, A., & Crothers, C. (2014). "They drag my marks down!"-Challenges faced by lecturers in the allocation of marks for multicultural group projects. Intercultural education, 25(3), 229-241. doi: 10.1080/14675986.2014.905361
- Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)-A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, A60-A68. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032
- Thorpe, M., & Edmunds, R. (2011). Practices with technology: Learning at the boundary between study and work. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 385-398. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00405.x
- Webb, N. M. (1995). Group collaboration in assessment: Multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 239-261. doi: 10.3102/01623737017002239
- UK Commission for Employment and Skills [CES]. (2016) Employer skills survey 2015: UK results. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/525444/UKCESS_2015_Report_for_web__May.pdf
- Universities UK. (2016) Higher education in England: Provision, skills and graduates. Retrieved from http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Pages/higher-education-in-england-provision-skills-and-graduates.aspx