To find out what is needed to speed up the adoption of open sharing and reuse of learning materials and open online courses in publicly funded Dutch institutions of Higher Education, a qualitative research study was conducted in fall 2016. This study examined issues of willingness of educators and management, barriers and enablers of adoption, and the role of institutional and national policy in the adoption of open sharing and reuse of learning materials and online courses. Fifty-five stakeholders (educators, board members, and support staff) in 10 Dutch Higher Education Institutions were interviewed. The main findings of this study are: motivation for sharing and reuse of learning materials for educators and managers is directly related to the ambition to achieve better education for students; sharing and reuse of learning materials is common practice, very diverse and not open accessible for the whole world, and important barriers include lack of awareness of opportunities for open sharing and reuse and lack of time. Based on the findings from the interviews, the last section of this paper presents conclusions and recommendations regarding how Dutch institutions for Higher Education can formulate effective policies to raise awareness, organize adequate support and provide time to experiment.
- adoption of open resources,
- Rogers’ theory of innovation diffusion,
- Elias’ notion of configuration,
- HE institution as innovation system,
- Dutch Higher Education
Download the article in PDF to read it.
- Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6), 68-72. Retrieved from http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_6_December_2015/10.pdf
- Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2016). Opening the textbook: Educational resources in U.S. higher education, 2015-16. Thornhill: Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthetextbook2016.pdf
- Belikov, O., & Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235-246. doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
- Bliss, T. J., Robinson, T., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). An OER COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2013(1). doi: 10.5334/2013-04
- Boeije, H. (2008). Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek. Denken en doen. Amsterdam: Boom Lemma uitgevers.
- Brennan, J., Ryan, S., Ranga, M., Broek, S., Durazzi, N., & Kamphuis, B. (2014). Study on innovation in higher education: Final report. LSE Research Online. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/55819/
- Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Cox, G., & Trotter, H. (2017). Factors shaping lecturers' adoption of OER at three South African universities. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 287-347). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.601935
- Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Walji, S., & Glover, M. (2017). OER in and as MOOCs. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 349-386). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.604414
- Dastur, F. (2017). How to open an academic department. In R.S. Jhangiani & R. Biswas-Diener (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science (pp. 163-178). London: Ubiquity Press. doi: 10.5334/bbc.m
- de los Arcos, B., Cannell, P., & McIlwhan, R. (2016). Awareness of open educational resources (OER) and open educational practice (OEP) in Scottish higher education institutions. OEPS Interim Report. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/OEPScotland/awareness-of-oer-and-oep-in-scottish-higher-education-institutions-survey-results
- de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, R., Perryman, L-A., Weller, M., & McAndrew, P. (2015). OER research hub data 2013-2015: Educators. OER Research Hub. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/47931/
- Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? London: Hutchinson.
- Elias, N., & Dunning, E. (1990). Quest for excitement. Sport and leisure in the civilizing process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Hall, B. (2005). Innovation and diffusion. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), Handbook on innovation (pp. 459-485). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Haywood, J., Connelly, L., Henderikx, P., Weller, M., & Williams, K. (2014). The changing pedagogical landscape. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2766/72063
- Iizuka, M. (2013). Innovation systems framework: Still useful in the new global context? (United Nations University Working Paper Series No. 2013-005). Maastricht: UNU-MERIT
- Jansen, D., Schuwer, R., Teixeira, A., & Aydin, C. (2015). Comparing MOOC adoption strategies in Europe: Results from the HOME project survey. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 116-136. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2154
- Jhangiani, R. S., Pitt, R., Hendricks, C., Key, J., & Lalonde, C. (2016). Exploring faculty use of open educational resources at British Columbia post-secondary institutions. BCcampus Research Report. Victoria, BC: BCcampus.
- Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2015). The value of knowledge. Strategic agenda for higher education and research 2015-2025. Retrieved from https://www.government.nl/documents/reports/2015/07/01/the-value-of-knowledge
- Mishra, S. (2017). Open educational resources: Removing barriers from within. Distance Education, 38(3), 369-380. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369350
- Nardi, B. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Contextual consciousness: activity-theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, IL: MIT Press.
- OECD. (2014). Measuring Innovation in Education: A New Perspective. Educational research and Innovation Report. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264215696-en
- Phalachandra, B., & Abeywardena, I. S. (2016). Open educational resources in the commonwealth 2016. Burnaby, Canada: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11599/2441
- Richter, T., & Ehlers, U. (2010). Barriers and motivators for using open educational resources in schools. In Open ED 2010 Proceedings (pp. 417-428). Barcelona: UOC, OU, BYU. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10609/4868
- Rogers, E. M. (2002). Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addictive Behaviors, 27(6), 989-993. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00300-3
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
- Rolfe, V. (2017). Striving toward openness: But what do we really mean? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), 75-88. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3207
- Schuwer, R., & Janssen, B. (2016). Open educational resources en MOOC's in het Nederlandse Hoger Onderwijs. Eindhoven: Fontys Hogeschool ICT. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/oermoocnl2016
- Schuwer, R., Wilson, T., Van Valkenburg, W., & Lane, A. (2010). Production of OER, a quest for efficiency. In Open Ed 2010. Barcelona: UOC, OU, BYU. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10609/5103
- Sloep, P. B., & Jochems, W. (2007). De e-lerende burger. In J. de Haan & J. Steyaert (Eds.), Jaarboek ICT en samenleving 2007; Eindelijk digitaal (pp. 171-187). Amsterdam: Boom
- Truyen, F., Van Dorp, K., Janssen, B., Rivera, J., Griset, R., & Kuppens, A. (2011). Open educational resources in a multi-campus and virtual campus environment. Proceedings of EDULEARN11 Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 1248-1258.
- UNESCO / Commonwealth of Learning. (2012). 2012 Paris OER declaration. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/English_Paris_OER_Declaration.pdf
- van Valkenburg, W., Kos, T., & Ouwehand, M. (2015). MOOCs as accelerator of change. In D. Jansen & A. Teixeira (Eds), Position papers for European cooperation on MOOCs (pp 19-24). Maastricht: EADTU. Retrieved from http://home.eadtu.eu/images/Position_papers_for_European_cooperation_on_MOOCs.pdf
- Weller, M. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn't feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bam
- Weller, M., de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, B., & McAndrew, P. (2015). The impact of OER on teaching and learning practice. Open Praxis, 7(4), 351-361. doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.22
- Wilson, G., & Stacey, E. (2004). Online interaction impacts on learning: Teaching the teachers to teach online. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 33-48. Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/1366/736