Research on MOOCs in Major Referred Journals: The Role and Place of Content

Babori, Abdelghani; Zaid, Abdelkarim; Fihri Fassi, Hicham

doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4385

Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., & Van de Ven, M. (2014). Self- and peer assessment in massive open online courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 119-128.

Google Scholar

Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453-474.

Google Scholar 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4

Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C. D., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2017). Understanding learners’ motivation and learning strategies in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 120-137. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2996

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2996

Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Rangwala, H. (2018). Needle in a haystack: Identifying learner posts that require urgent response in MOOC discussion forums. Computers & Education, 118, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.002

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.002

Andersen, R., & Mørch, A. I. (2009, March). Mutual development: A case study in customer- initiated software product development. In International Symposium on End User Development (pp. 31-49). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Google Scholar 10.1007/978-3-642-00427-8_3

Andersen, R., & Ponti, M. (2014). Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: Challenges and opportunities. Distance Education, 35(2), 234-249. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917703

Google Scholar 10.1080/01587919.2014.917703

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. ( 2008). Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369-386.

Google Scholar 10.1002/pits.20303

Ashton, S., & Davies, R. S. (2015). Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing course. Distance Education, 36(3), 312-334. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733

Google Scholar 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733

Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 49-60.

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010

Barnard-Brak, L., Paton, V. O., & Lan, W. Y. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 61-80. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769

Bogdan, R. (2017). Integrating MOOCs in embedded systems blended Courses. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 8(3), 101-107. Retrieved from http://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brain

Google Scholar

Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and patterns in massive open online courses: Review and content analysis of research on MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 119-147. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080

Canbek, N. G., & Hargis, J. (2015). Educational innovation in e-learning: MOOCs and OER movements in Turkey. Glokalde, 1(1), 19-32. Retrieved from http://www.glokalde.com/

Google Scholar

Chen, Y. H., & Chen, P. J. (2015). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55-70. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008

Cisel, M., & Bruillard, É. (2013). Chronique des MOOC. Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Éducation et la Formation, 19. Retrieved from http://sticef.univ-lemans.fr/

Google Scholar 10.3406/stice.2012.1035

Cohen, L., & Magen-Nagar, N. (2016). Self-regulated learning and a sense of achievement in MOOCs among high school science and technology students. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(2), 68-79.

Google Scholar 10.1080/08923647.2016.1155905

Costley, J., & Lange, C. H. (2017). The effects of lecture diversity on germane load. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 27-46. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2860

Google Scholar

Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. J. (2018). Activating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies. Computers & Education, 125, 327-344. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.

Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Google Scholar

Delcambre, I. (2013). Contenus d’enseignement et d’apprentissages. In Y. Reuter, C. Cohen-Azria, B. Daunay, and D. Lahanier-Reuter (Eds.), Dictionnaire des concepts fondamentaux des didactiques (pp. 43-48). De Boeck Supérieur. Retrieved from https://www.cairn.info/dictionnaire-des-concepts-fondamentaux-des-didacti9782804169107.htm

Google Scholar 10.3917/dbu.reute.2013.01

de Lima, M., & Zorrilla, M. E. (2017). Social networks and the building of learning communities: An experimental study of a social MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 40-64. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction. Upper Saddle River. N.J.: Merrill/Pearson.

Google Scholar

Dysthe, O. (2001). Dialog, samspel og læring [Dialogue, interaction and learning]. Oslo: Abstrakt Forlag.

Google Scholar

Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 328-345. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjem20

Google Scholar 10.1080/17439884.2013.878352

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

Google Scholar

Engle, D., Mankoff, C., & Carbrey, J. (2015). Coursera’s introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 46-68. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2010

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2010

Evans, S., & Myrick, J. G. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 36(3), 295-311. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736

Google Scholar 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736

Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., Collins, E. D., & Sujitparapitaya, S. (2014). Case study: Using MOOCs for conventional college coursework. Distance Education, 35(2), 178-201. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917707

Google Scholar 10.1080/01587919.2014.917707

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. doi: 10.4324/9780203838020

Google Scholar

Fluckiger, C., & Reuter, Y. (2014). Les contenus «informatiques» et leur(s) reconstruction(s) par des élèves de CM2. Etude didactique. Recherches en éducation, 18, 64-78. Retrieved from https://hal.univ-lille3.fr/

Google Scholar

Formanek, M., Wenger, M. C., Buxner, S. R., Impey, C. D., & Sonam, T. (2017). Insights about large-scale online peer assessment from an analysis of an astronomy MOOC. Computers & Education, 113, 243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.019

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.019

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept: State of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-119.

Google Scholar

Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35-41. doi: 10.2307/3033543

Google Scholar

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Google Scholar 10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6

Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 135-176. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954

Gillani, N., & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.004

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.004

Halasek, K., McCorkle, B., Selfe, C. L., DeWitt, S. L., Delagrange, S., Michaels, J., & Clinnin, K. (2014). A MOOC with a view: How MOOCs encourage us to reexamine pedagogical doxa. In S. D. Krause, & C. Lowe (Eds.). Invasion of the MOOCs: The promises and perils of massive open online courses. Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.

Google Scholar

Hartnett, M., St. George, A., & Dron, J. (2011). Examining motivation in online distance learning environments: Complex, multifaceted, and situation-dependent. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 20-38. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.1030

Google Scholar

Hasni, A., Bousadra, F., Belletête, V., Benabdallah, A., Nicole, M. C., & Dumais, N. (2016). Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K-12 levels: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 199-231. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573

Google Scholar 10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573

Henderikx, M. A., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017). Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention-behavior gap. Distance Education, 38(3), 353-368. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006

Google Scholar 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006

Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320-341. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12235

Google Scholar 10.1111/bjet.12235

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.

Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.

Google Scholar

Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157-168. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016

Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners' contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83-91.

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.019

Huisman, B., Admiraal, W., Pilli, O., van de Ven, M., & Saab, N. (2018). Peer assessment in MOOCs: The relationship between peer reviewers’ ability and authors’ essay performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 101-110. doi: 0.1111/bjet.12520

Google Scholar 10.1111/bjet.12520

Israel, M. J. (2015). Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 102-118. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222

Jacoby, J. (2014). The disruptive potential of the massive open online course: A literature review. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 18(1), 73-85. Retrieved from http://www.jofdl.nz/

Google Scholar

Jiang, S., Williams, A. E., Warschauer, M., He, W., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2014). Influence of incentives on performance in a pre-college biology MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 100-112. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1858

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1858

Kahan, T., Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2017). Types of participant behavior in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 2-18. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3087

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3087

Kamradt, T. F., & Kamradt, E. J. (1999). Structured design for attitudinal instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Google Scholar

Kellogg, S., Booth, S., & Oliver, K. (2014). A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 264-289. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852

Kennedy, J. (2014). Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): A research review, 2009-2012. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/

Google Scholar

Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001

Kwak, S. (2017). Approaches reflected in academic writing MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 139-155. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2845

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2845

Lebeaume, J. (2000). L'éducation technologique. Histoires et méthodes [Technological education. Stories and methods]. Paris: ESF.

Google Scholar

Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 28-41. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3749

Google Scholar 10.14742/ajet.3749

Li, N., Verma, H., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Watching MOOCs together: Investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35(2), 217-233. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917708

Google Scholar 10.1080/01587919.2014.917708

Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K. Ø., & Williams, S. A. (2015). Who are with us: MOOC learners on a FutureLearn course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 557-569. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12261

Google Scholar 10.1111/bjet.12261

Marks, R.B., Sibley, S.D., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2005) A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563.

Google Scholar

Martinand, J. L. (2012). Éducation au Développement durable et didactiques du curriculum [Education for Sustainable Development and Curriculum Didactics]. In Conférence au XIXe Colloque AFIRSE. Lisbonne: Educagri.

Google Scholar

Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 9(2), 149-159. doi: http://jolt.merlot.org/

Google Scholar

Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2016). How health professionals regulate their learning in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.005

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.005

Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 92-102. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 125, 101-119. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.006

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.006

Nortvig, A. M., & Christiansen, R. B. (2017). Institutional collaboration on MOOCs in education - A literature review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 307-316. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3110

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3110

Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times, 2(12), 2012. Retrieved from https://www.edinaschools.org/cms/lib/MN01909547/Centricity/Domain/272/The%20Year%20of%20the%20MOOC%20NY%20Times.pdf

Google Scholar

Paton, R. M., Fluck, A. E., & Scanlan, J. D. (2018). Engagement and retention in VET MOOCs and online courses: A systematic review of literature from 2013-2017. Computers & Education, 125, 191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.013

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.013

Phan, T., McNeil, S. G., & Robin, B. R. (2016). Students’ patterns of engagement and course performance in a massive open online course. Computers & Education, 95, 36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015

Pundak, D., Sabag, N., & Trotskovsky, E. (2014). Accreditation of MOOCs. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 17(2), 117-129. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org

Google Scholar 10.2478/eurodl-2014-0023

Raffaghelli, J. E., Cucchiara, S., & Persico, D. (2015). Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracing the myth of Proteus. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 488-509. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12279

Google Scholar 10.1111/bjet.12279

Rieber, L. P. (2017). Participation patterns in a massive open online course (MOOC) about statistics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1295-1304. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12504

Google Scholar 10.1111/bjet.12504

Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91-115. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743

Google Scholar 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743

Riyami, B., Mansouri, K., & Poirier, F. (2016). Towards integrating MOOC in the Moroccan higher educational system: Economic pedagogical model based on ICT for on-going education and teacher motivation. In ICERI 2016. Seville: IATED. Retrieved from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr

Google Scholar 10.21125/iceri.2016.0572

Rolfe, V. (2015). A systematic review of the socio-ethical aspects of massive online open courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 18(1), 52-71. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org

Google Scholar 10.1515/eurodl-2015-0004

Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

Google Scholar

Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 1-19. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.

Google Scholar 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/networks.htm

Google Scholar

Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H., Roth, N. E. W., Li, K., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Canelas, D. A. (2017). Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers & Education, 110, 35-50. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.003

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.003

Simonson, M. R. (1979). Designing instruction for attitudinal outcomes. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(3), 15-19. doi: 10.1007/BF02984375

Google Scholar

Simonson, M., & Maushak, N. (1996). Instructional technology and attitude change. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 984-1016). Mayway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Google Scholar

Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2015). Implementation of Tel Aviv university MOOCs in academic curriculum: A pilot study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 80-97. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.2031

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.2031

Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42.

Google Scholar

Stich, A. E., & Reeves, T. D. (2017). Massive open online courses and underserved students in the United States. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.09.001

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.09.001

Stump, G. S., DeBoer, J., Whittinghill, J., & Breslow, L. (2013). Development of a framework to classify MOOC discussion forum posts: Methodology and challenges. Proceedings of NIPS 2013 Workshop on Data Driven Education. Retrieved from http://tll.mit.edu/sites/default/files/library/Coding_a_MOOC_Discussion_Forum.pdf

Google Scholar

Svinicki, M. D. (2010). A guidebook for conceptual frameworks for research in engineering education. Retrieved from http://crlte.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2013/06/Svinicki-Conceptual-Frameworks.pdf

Google Scholar

Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners’ experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570-587. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12297

Google Scholar 10.1111/bjet.12297

Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2015). Who studies MOOCs? Interdisciplinarity in MOOC research and its changes over time. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 1-17. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2202

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2202

Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013-2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 199-221. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448

Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37(2), 208-223. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400

Google Scholar 10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400

Wang, Z., Anderson, T., Chen, L., & Barbera, E. (2016). Interaction pattern analysis in cMOOCs based on the connectivist interaction and engagement framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 683-699. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12433

Google Scholar 10.1111/bjet.12433

Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709

Wang, Z. J., & Chen, L. (2015). Theory framework building of instructional interaction in connectivist learning context. The Journal of Open Educational Research, 5, 25-34. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709

Google Scholar

Watson, W. R., Kim, W., & Watson, S. L. (2016). Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an animal behavior and welfare MOOC. Computers & Education, 96, 83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.013

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.013

Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Janakiraman, S., & Richardson, J. (2017). A team of instructors’ use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance strategies: An animal behaviour and welfare MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 69-91. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2663

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2663

Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Richardson, J., & Loizzo, J. (2016). Instructor’s use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance: A case study of an attitudinal change MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 55-74. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379

Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Yu, J. H., Alamri, H., & Mueller, C. (2017). Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 114, 274-285. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.005

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.005

Watted, A., & Barak, M. (2018). Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001

Wise, A. F., Cui, Y., Jin, W., & Vytasek, J. (2017). Mining for gold: Identifying content-related MOOC discussion threads across domains through linguistic modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 11-28. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.001

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.001

Wong, B. T. M. (2016). Factors leading to effective teaching of MOOCs. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 105-118. Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.co

Google Scholar

Xu, B., Zhang, Y., Li, F., & Yang, D. (2015). MOOC Ke Cheng Lun Tan Zhong Xue Xi Zhe Lun Tan Jiao Hu Wang Luo Jie Gou Te Zheng Fen Xi [The structural analysis of interactive network formed MOOC discussion forums]. Computer Education, 15, 23-35. doi: 10.16512/j.cnki.jsjjy.2015.15.007

Google Scholar

Yang, Q. (2014). Students motivation in asynchronous online discussions with MOOC mode. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(5), 325-330.

Google Scholar

Yang, H. H., & Su, C. H. (2017). Learner behaviour in a MOOC practice-oriented course: In empirical study integrating TAM and TPB. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 36-63. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2991

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2991

Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., & Jakobs, H. (2014). A review of the state-of-the-art. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. Barcelona: SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications.

Google Scholar

Zaid, A (2017). Élaborer, transmettre et construire des contenus scientifiques et technologiques. Perspective didactique des dispositifs d'éducation et de formation [Develop, transmit and build scientific content and technology. Didactic perspective of education and training systems]. Rennes: PUR.

Google Scholar

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What research says about MOOCs - An explorative content analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 243-259. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356

Google Scholar 10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356

Zhang, J. (2016). Can MOOCs be interesting to students? An experimental investigation from regulatory focus perspective. Computers & Education, 95, 340-351. doi: /10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.003

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.003

Zhang, J., Skryabin, M., & Song, X. (2016). Understanding the dynamics of MOOC discussion forums with simulation investigation for empirical network analysis (SIENA). Distance Education, 37(3), 270-286. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1226230

Google Scholar 10.1080/01587919.2016.1226230

Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92, 194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012

Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014-2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.002

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.002

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.

Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.

Google Scholar

Research on MOOCs in Major Referred JournalsThe Role and Place of Content

Abstract

Bibliography

Abstracts

Abstract

Appendices

Bibliography

Citation Tools

Cite this article

Export the record for this article