Abstracts
Abstract
Interactions that take place between MOOC users outside of discussion forums, and out of the reach of course designers, have received little attention from the scientific community despite their potential influence on learner retention. Based on an online survey, we found that MOOCs are often used as an activity among friends and family, and not exclusively in the academics or in the workplace. Interactions between course users may continue beyond of the boundaries of the course, and sometimes into other MOOCs. These various interactions include collaborative tasks, as well as tasks which should be performed individually, such as assessments. This work illustrates the mismatch that can appear between prescribed and actual tasks, and the potential importance of interactions between users, to address the isolation that contributes to low retention rates for online learners.
Keywords:
- MOOC,
- interactions,
- social networks,
- lifelong learning,
- completion rates
Appendices
Bibliography
- Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 98-118. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.902
- Bulger, M., Bright, J., & Cobo, C. (2015). The real component of virtual learning: motivations for face-to-face MOOC meetings in developing and industrialized countries. Information, Communication & Society, 18(10), 1200-1216. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2641798
- Chen, Y.-H., & Chen, P.-J. (2015). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55-70. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008
- Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2350964
- Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. doi: 10.5334/2012-18
- Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.643
- Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8-21. doi: 10.1080/08923649309526830
- Gillani, N., & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.004
- Kellogg, S., Booth, S., & Oliver, K. (2014). A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 263-289. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852
- Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 104 (Supplement C), 18-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
- Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/6/retention-and-intention-in-massive-open-online-courses
- Kolowich, S. (2013). The professors behind the MOOC hype [Blog post]. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905/
- Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 19-38. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882
- Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-93. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041
- Koutropoulos, A., Abajian, S., deWaard, I., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., & Rodriguez, C. (2014). What tweets tell us about MOOC participation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 9(1), 8-21. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/130546/
- Lamb, A., Smilack, J., Ho, A., & Reich, J. (2015). Addressing common analytic challenges to randomized experiments in MOOCs: Attrition and zero-inflation. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 21-30). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2724660.2724669
- Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
- Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2014). Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 197-213. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1855
- Najafi, H., Rolheiser, C., Harrison, L., & Håklev, S. (2015). University of Toronto instructors' experiences with developing MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2073
- Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
- Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistance rates in distance education online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6
- Seaton, D. T., Bergner, Y., Chuang, I., Mitros, P., & Pritchard, D. E. (2014). Who does what in a massive open online course? Communications of the ACM, 57(4), 58-65.
- Thomas, S. L. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 591-615. doi: 10.2307/2649261
- Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125. doi: 10.3102/00346543045001089
- Tinto, V. (1982). Limits of theory and practice in student attrition. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(6), 687-700. doi: 10.2307/1981525
- Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001
- Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners' experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570-587. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12297