The purpose of this study was to explore non-thesis Master’s students’ perceptions and expectations of good tutors and advisors in distance education programmes. It also examined whether these perceptions and expectations are related to student characteristics including age, gender, university, programme, semester, and previous online learning experience. The current study was conducted within the framework of Transactional Distance Theory. Using a mixed methods approach, a questionnaire was administered to 143 students in four programmes in two universities in Turkey and interviews were conducted with 11 of these students. Results showed that good tutors and advisors in distance education provide a stimulating student-centred learning environment, have a caring and individualised interaction and communication with students, and have subject expertise and basic technology skills. The results of this study will improve distance education tutors and advisors’ practices in supporting graduate students’ education and research.
- distance education,
- graduate students’ perceptions,
- graduate students’ expectations
- Abdulla, A. G. (2004). Distance learning students’ perceptions of the online instructor roles and competencies. Doctoral Dissertation. Tallahassee, Florida: Florida State University.
- Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group.
- Bawane, J., & Spector, J. M. (2009). Prioritization of online instructor roles: Implications for competency-based teacher education programs. Distance Education, 30(3), 383-397. doi: 10.1080/01587910903236536
- Benson, R., & Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e‐learning: Using transactional distance theory to inform design. Distance Education, 30(1), 5-21. doi: 10.1080/01587910902845972
- Cain, D. L., Marrara, C., Pitre, P. E., & Armour, S. (2007). Support services that matter: An exploration of the experiences and needs of graduate students in a distance learning environment. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 18(1), 42-56. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/129
- Capdeferro, N., & Romero, M. (2012). Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 26-44. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1127
- Creswell, J. W. (2007). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65-79. doi: 10.1080/01587910701305319
- Edwards, M., Perry, B., & Janzen, K. (2011). The making of an exemplary online educator. Distance Education, 32(1), 101-118. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2011.565499
- Gardner, S. K., & Mendoza, P. (Eds.). (2010). On becoming a scholar: Socialization and development in doctoral education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
- Giossos, Y., Koutsouba, M., Lionarakis, A., & Skavantzos, K. (2009). Reconsidering Moore’s transactional distance theory. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 2009(2). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2009&halfyear=2&article=374
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. doi: 10.1525/sp.1965.12.4.03a00070
- Higher Education Council of Turkey. (2016). Öğrenci İstatistikleri [Student Statistics]. Retrieved January 15, 2016 from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr
- Holzweiss, P. C., Joyner, S. A., Fuller, M. B., Henderson, S., & Young, R. (2014). Online graduate students’ perceptions of best learning experiences. Distance Education, 35(3), 311-323. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.955262
- Howland, J. L., & Moore, J. L. (2002). Student perceptions as distance learners in Internet-based courses. Distance Education, 23(2), 183-195. doi: 10.1080/0158791022000009196
- Huang, H. M. (2002). Student perceptions in an online mediated environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 405-422. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/64267/
- Huang, X., Chandra, A., DePaolo, C. A., & Simmons, L. L. (2016). Understanding transactional distance in web‐based learning environments: An empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 734-747. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12263
- Jelfs, A., Richardson, J. T., & Price, L. (2009). Student and tutor perceptions of effective tutoring in distance education. Distance Education, 30(3), 419-441. doi: 10.1080/01587910903236551
- Joo, K. P., Andrés, C., & Shearer, R. (2014). Promoting distance learners’ cognitive engagement and learning outcomes: Design-based research in the Costa Rican National University of Distance Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6). 188-210. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1908
- Kahu, E. R., Stephens, C., Leach, L., & Zepke, N. (2013). The engagement of mature distance students. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 791-804. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.777036
- Lemak, D. J., Shin, S. J., Reed, R., & Montgomery, J. C. (2005). Technology, transactional distance, and instructor effectiveness: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 150-159. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268562
- Lessing, A. C., & Schulze, S. (2002). Postgraduate supervision and academic support: Students’ perceptions. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16(2), 139-149. doi: 10.4314/sajhe.v16i2.25253
- Lessing, A. C., & Schulze, S. (2003). Lecturers’ experience of postgraduate supervision in a distance education context: Research in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 17(2), 159-168. doi: 10.4314/sajhe.v17i2.25309
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Lovitts, B. E. (2005). Being a good course taker is not enough: A theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 137-154. doi: 10.1080/03075070500043093
- Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. doi: 10.1080/08923648909526659
- Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. Theoretical principles of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 1(1), 22-38. doi: 10.4324/9780203803738.ch5
- Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
- Oosterhof, A., Conrad, R. M., & Ely, D. P. (2008). Assessing learners online. Saddleback River, NJ: Pearson.
- Pattillo, G. (2005). Fast facts. College and Research Libraries News, 66(6), 500.
- Risner, M., & Kumar, S. (2016). Graduate student perceptions of a globally networked course. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(3), 287-301. doi: 10.1108/JARHE-01-2015-0009
- Schroeder, S. M. (2012). Perceived advising needs of adult learners: A qualitative analysis of advising experiences among online, classroom, & cohort adult learners. Doctoral Dissertation. Grand Forks, North Dakota: University of North Dakota.
- Schroeder, S. M., Baker, M., Terras, K., Mahar, P., & Chiasson, K. (2016). Desired and experienced levels of connectivity to an asynchronous, online, distance degree program. Online Learning, 20(3), 244-263. doi: 10.24059/olj.v20i3.691
- Soong, B. M. H., Chan, H. C, Chua, B. C., & Loh, K. F. (2001). Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Computers & Education, 36(2), 101-120. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00044-0
- Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C., & Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105-118. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_4
- Stoessel, K., Ihme, T. A., Barbarino, M. L., Fisseler, B., & Stürmer, S. (2015). Sociodemographic diversity and distance education: Who drops out from academic programs and why? Research in Higher Education, 56(3), 228-246. doi: 10.1007/s11162-014-9343-x
- Trinidad, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2005). Development, validation and use of the online learning environment survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 60-81. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1343
- Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-02423-7
- Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65-77. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2