This study investigates how and where distance learners use handheld devices and the impact this has on learning habits, access to learning content and quality of work. It analyses the spatial dimension of anytime-anywhere learning and, with a focus on anywhere learning, it explores students’ ongoing negotiation of the flow between and across study locations. The study concludes by proposing two new concepts: the flow of places and place of space. These should help direct the framing of future studies into the places, spaces, and mobility of formal and informal seamless learning. A dataset comprising 446 responses from undergraduate students enrolled at the UK’s largest distance learning university was analysed in respect to three research questions. All age groups, study levels, and disciplines were represented. Five key findings are: most students now use handheld devices for study-related learning; the distribution of study-related learning tasks was similar in all seven study places; there is a strong, statistically-significant correlation between the number of study places in which handheld devices are used and the number of study task types performed; two fifths of students using a handheld device for learning have noticed a change in study habit and benefit to learning; and multiple regression analysis shows three variables (number of study places, number of study tasks, and change in study habits) are predictors of finding it easier to access learning materials and improved quality of learners’ work.
- mobile learning,
- seamless learning,
- study space,
- handheld learning technologies,
- anywhere learning,
- distance education
Download the article in PDF to read it.
- Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93-102.
- Ally, M., & Prieto-Blazquez, J. (2014). What is the future of mobile learning in education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 11(1), 142-151.
- Attewell, J., & Savill-Smith, C. (2005). Mobile learning anytime everywhere: A book of papers from mLearn 2004. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
- Awadhiya, A. K., & Miglani, A. (2016). Mobile learning: Challenges for teachers of Indian open universities. Journal of Learning for Development, 3(2), 35-46.
- Bozkurt, A., & Bozkaya, M. (2015). Evaluation criteria for interactive e-books for open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 58-82.
- Brooks, D. C. (2016). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2016. Louisville, CO: ECAR.
- Brown, T. H., & Mbati, L. S. (2015). Mobile learning: Moving past the myths and embracing the opportunities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 115-135.
- Castells, M. (1997 ). The power of identity, the information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. II). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Chai, C. S., Wong, L. -H., & King, R. B. (2016). Surveying and modelling students’ motivation and learning strategies for mobile-assisted seamless Chinese language learning. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 170-180.
- Chan, T-W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T. ... Hoppe, U. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3-29.
- Chen, B., Seilhamer, R., Bennett, L., & Bauer, S. (2015, June 22). Students’ mobile learning practices in higher education: A multi-year study. Educause Review Online. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/6/students-mobile-learning-practices-in-higher-education-a-multiyear-study
- Cliatt, C. (2010, February 22). Kindle pilot results highlight possibilities for paper reduction. News at Princeton. Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S26/64/38E35/
- Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. New York: Springer.
- Cross S., Sharples, M., & Healing, G. (2015). e-pedagogy of handheld devices 2013 survey: Patterns of student use for learning. IET Research and Innovation Report Series, (ISSN: 2058-9867). Retrieved from http://proxima.iet.open.ac.uk/public/2015-01-RI-E-Pedagogy-of-handheld-devices-2013-survey.pdf
- Cross, S., Sharples, M., & Healing, G. (2016). Learning with mobile devices: The changing place and space of distance learners’ study. Proceedings of EDULEARN 16: 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 5385-5393). Barcelona, Spain. 2016. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/46924/
- Dahlstrom, E., de Boor, T., Grunwald, P., & Vockley, M. (2011). ECAR national study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2011. Boulder, CO: ECAR.
- Dahlstrom, E., Brooks, D. C., Grajek, S., & Reeves, J. (2015). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2015. Louisville, CO: ECAR.
- Demsey, L. (2008). Always on: Libraries in a world of permanent connectivity. In G. Needham & M. Ally (Eds.), M-libraries: Libraries on the move to provide virtual access (pp.xxv-lii). London, UK: Facet Publishing.
- Gebb, B. A., & Young, Z. (2014). Mobile resource use in a distance learning population: What are they really doing on those devices? Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3-4), 288-300.
- Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones and social media. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18-26.
- Glassman, M., & Burbidge, J. (2014). The dialectical relationship between place and space in education: How the Internet is changing our perceptions of teaching and learning. Educational Theory, 64(1), 15-32.
- Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2009). Scholarly e-books: The views of 16,000 academics: Results from the JISC National e-Book Observatory. Aslib Proceedings, 6(1), 33-47.
- Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722-732.
- Krull, G., & Duart, J. M. (2017). Research trends in mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review of articles (2011-2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), 1-23.
- Lam, P., Wong, K., Cheng, R., Ho, E., & Yuen, S. (2011). Changes in students’ mobile learning readiness: Comparison of survey data collected over a nine-month period. In S. Barton, J. Hedberg, & K. Suzuki, (Eds), Proceedings of global learn 2011 (pp. 180-189). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Melbourne, Australia.
- Lowenthal, J. N. (2010). Using mobile learning: determinates impacting behavioral intention. American Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 195-206.
- Margolin, S., Driscoll, C., Toland, M., & Kegler, J. (2013). e-Readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 512-519.
- Martin, A., & Madigan, D., (2006). Digital literacies for learning. London: Facet.
- McGraw-Hill Education (2016). McGraw-Hill Education 2016 digital study trends survey. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/McGrawHillEducation/2016-digital-study-trends-survey
- Newman, T., & Beetham, H. (2017). Student digital experience tracker: The voice of 22,000 UK learners. Bristol, UK: JISC.
- Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioural intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56-73.
- Rainie, L. & Smith, A. (2013). Tablet and e-reader ownership update. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, Washington D.C. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tablets-and-ereaders.aspx
- Rushby, N. (2012). Editorial: An agenda for mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 355-356.
- Sanky, M., Tynan, B., & McKeon, C. (2013). Findings from the USQ students’ experiences and expectations of technologies survey 2012. Toowoomba, Australia: University of Southern Queensland. Retrieved from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/25922
- Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: eExploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 1006-1021.
- Sharples, M. (2015). Seamless learning despite context. In L. -H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity (pp. 41-55). Singapore: Springer.
- Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing, and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-12.
- Traxler, J. (2010). Distance education and mobile learning: Catching up, taking stock. Distance Education, 31(2), 129-138.
- Universities UK. (2016). Patterns and trends in UK higher education 2016 (interim update). Retrieved from http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/facts-and-stats/data-and-analysis/Documents/patterns-and-trends-2016.pdf
- Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: A 3-level evaluation framework. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(2), 54-75.
- Walker, K. (2006). Introduction: Mapping the landscape of mobile learning. In M. Sharples (Ed.), Big issues in mobile learning: Report of a workshop by the kaleidoscope network of excellence mobile learning initiative (pp. 3-4). Nottingham, UK: Learning Sciences Research Institute.
- Wingkvist, A., & Ericsson, M. (2009). Current practice in mobile learning: A survey of research method and purpose. In D. A. Metcalf, A. Hamilton, & C. Graffeo, C. (Eds.), MLearn 2009: 8th world conference on mobile and contextual learning (pp. 103-111). Orlando, FL: The University of Central Florida.
- Wong, L. -H., King, R. B., & Chai, C. S., (2016). Surveying and modelling students’ motivation and learning strategies for mobile-assisted seamless Chinese language learning. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 170-180.
- Wong, L. -H., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., & Liu, M. (2016). Seamlessly learning Chinese: Contextual meaning making and vocabulary growth in a seamless Chinese as a second language learning environment. Instructional Science, 44, 399-422.
- Wong, L. -H., & Looi, C. -K. (2012). Enculturing self-directed seamless learners: Towards a facilitated seamless learning process framework mediated by mobile technology. Proceedings of 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (pp. 1-8). Takamatsu, Kagawa Japan.
- Wong, L. -H., Milrad, M., & Specht, M. (2015). Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity. Singapore: Springer.
- Wrigglesworth, J., & Harvor, F. (2017). Making their own landscape: Smartphones and student designed language learning environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 437-458.
- Wu, W. -H., Wu, Y. -C. J., Chen, C. -Y., Kao, H. -Y., Lin, C-H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 59(2), 817-827.