As education becomes increasingly complex, effective continuing professional learning is an important strategy to support teachers in schools. However, current professional development approaches may not meet contemporary teachers’ needs. Seeking to enhance teachers’ professional learning opportunities, this paper presents a model of learning as a connected professional. The model draws upon the findings of a qualitative case study of 13 teachers who interact with others through a personal learning network (PLN). Theories of connectivism, networked learning, and connected learning underpin the model, which conceptualises the whole experience of learning as a connected professional. The model comprises three elements: arenas of learning, teacher as learner, and PLN. Key characteristics of the experience are practices described as linking, stretching, and amplifying. These practices recur in various ways across all three elements of the model. The model promotes professional learning that is active, interest-driven, and autonomous, meeting personal learning needs while being socially connected. As education becomes increasingly complex, effective continuing professional learning is an important strategy to support teachers in schools. However, current professional development approaches may not meet contemporary teachers’ needs. Seeking to enhance teachers’ professional learning opportunities, this paper presents a model of learning as a connected professional. The model draws upon the findings of a qualitative case study of 13 teachers who interact with others through a personal learning network (PLN).Theories of connectivism, networked learning, and connected learning underpin the model, which conceptualises the whole experience of learning as a connected professional. The model comprises three elements: arenas of learning, teacher as learner, and PLN. Key characteristics of the experience are practices described as linking, stretching, and amplifying. These practices recur in various ways across all three elements of the model. The model promotes professional learning that is active, interest-driven, and autonomous, meeting personal learning needs while being socially connected.
- personal learning network,
- networked learning,
- professional learning,
Download the article in PDF to read it.
- Baker-Doyle, K. J. (2012). First-year teachers' support networks: Intentional professional networks and diverse professional allies. New Educator, 8(1), 65-85. doi: 10.1080/1547688X.2012.641870
- Baker-Doyle, K. J. (2017). Transformative teachers: Teacher leadership and learning in a connected world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., Panter, A. T., Rindskopf, D., & Sher, K. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57-71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Bridgstock, R. (2016). Graduate employability 2.0: Social networks for learning, career development and innovation in the digital age. Queensland University of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.graduateemployability2-0.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2016/09/Graduate-employability-2-0-discussion-paper.pdf
- Butterfield, L. D., Borgen, W. A., Amundson, N. E., & Maglio, A.-S. T. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 475-497. doi: 10.1177/1468794105056924
- Calvert, L. (2016). Moving from compliance to agency: what teachers need to make professional learning work. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. Retrieved from http://nctaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/NCTAF-Learning-Forward_Moving-from-Compliance-to-Agency_What-Teachers-Need-to-Make-Professional-Learning-Work.pdf
- Carpenter, J., & Krutka, D. (2015). Engagement through microblogging: educator professional development via Twitter. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 707-728. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.939294
- Cho, H. (2016). Under co-construction: An online community of practice for bilingual pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 92-93, 76-89. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.008
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249-305. doi: 10.3102/0091732X024001249
- Couros, A. (2010). Developing personal learning networks for open and social learning. In Veletsianos, G. (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 109-128). Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.
- Couros, A., & Hildebrandt, K. (2016). Designing of open and social learning. In Veletsianos, G. (Ed.), Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications (pp. 143-161). doi: 10.15215/aupress/9781771991490.01
- Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teacher's professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society and Education, 7(3), 252-263. doi: 10.25115/psye.v7i3.515
- Downes, S. (2010). Learning networks and connective knowledge. In Yang, H. H. (Ed.), Collective intelligence and e-learning 2.0: Implications of web-based communities and networking (pp. 1-26). doi: 10.4018/978-1-60566-729-4
- Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/post/58207
- DuFour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community"? Educational Leadership, 61(6). Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership
- Gogia, Laura Park. (2016, 9-11 May ). Collaborative Curiousity: Demonstrating relationships between open education, networked learning and connected learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Networked Learning, Lancaster UK.
- Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151-182. doi: 10.1080/713698714
- Haythornthwaite, C., & de Laat, M. (2010). Social networks and learning networks: Using social network perspectives to understand social learning. 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, 183-190. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/index.htm
- Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open educational resources. Education Technology, 55(4), 3-13.
- Hughes, H. (2012). An expanded critical incident approach for exploring information use and learning. Library and Information Research, 36(112), 72-95. doi: 10.29173/lirg492
- Huitt, W., & Monetti, D. (2017). Openness and the Transformation of Education and Schooling. In R., J. & R., B.-D. (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science (pp. 43-65). doi: 10.5334/bbc.d
- Hur, J. W., & Brush, T. A. (2009). Teacher participation in online communities: Why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K-12 teachers? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 279. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782532
- Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design (9780988725508). Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. Retrieved from http://dmlhub.net/wp-content/uploads/files/Connected_Learning_report.pdf
- Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & boyd, d. (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Jones, C. (2015). Networked learning: An educational paradigm for the age of digital networks. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-01934-5
- Jones, C., & de Laat, M. (2016). Networked learning. In Haythornthwaite, C., Andrews, R., Fransman, J., & Meyers, E. M. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of e-learning research (pp. 43-62). doi: 10.4135/9781473955011.n3
- Katz, S., & Earl, L. (2010). Learning about networked learning communities. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 27-51. doi: 10.1080/09243450903569718
- Lee, L. H. J., Rahmat, R. B., Heng, L. P., Li, L., & Hwee, T. T. (2018). Online knowledge construction in networked learning communities. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on Networked Learning, Zagreb, Croatia. Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/abstracts/papers/leej_49.pdf
- Lieberman, A., & Pointer Mace, D. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 77-88. doi: 10.1177/0022487109347319
- Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55(1), 291-307. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021
- Mackey, J., & Evans, T. (2011). Interconnecting networks of practice for professional learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 1-18. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
- McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43.
- Mockler, N., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2009). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance: Mind the gap. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9417-0
- Moolenaar, N. M. (2012). A social network perspective on teacher collaboration in schools: Theory, methodology, and applications. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 7-39. doi: 10.1086/667715
- Moreillon, J. (2016). Building your personal learning network(PLN): 21st-Century School Librarians Seek Self- Regulated Professional Development Online. Knowledge Quest, 44(3), 64.
- Nussbaum-Beach, S. (2013). Just the facts: PLNs. The Phi Delta Kappan, 94(7), 16-17. Retrieved from http://pdk.sagepub.com/
- Prestridge, S. (2017). Conceptualising self-generating online teacher professional development. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 85-104. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2016.1167113
- Prestridge, S. (2019). Categorising teachers' use of social media for their professional learning: A self-generating professional learning paradigm. Computers & Education, 129, 143-158. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003
- Ranieri, M., Manca, S., & Fini, A. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 754-769. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01356.x
- Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2011). A self-determination theory perspective on social, institutional, cultural, and economic supports for autonomy and their importance for well-being. In Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., & Sheldon, K. M. (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (pp. 45-64). doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9667-8_3
- Sachs, J. (2011). Skilling or emancipating? Metaphors for continuing teacher professional development. In Mockler, N. & Sachs, J. (Eds.), Rethinking educational practice through reflexive inquiry: Essays in honour of Susan Groundwater-Smith (pp. 153-167). doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0805-1_11
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2005 (January). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/
- Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. London, England: SAGE.
- Smith Risser, H., & Bottoms, S. (2014). “Newbies” and “Celebrities”: Detecting social roles in an online network of teachers via participation patterns. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(4), 433-450. doi: 10.1007/s11412-014-9197-4
- Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258. doi: 10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
- Thomas, G. (2016). How to do your case study. London, England: SAGE.
- Ting, Y.-L. (2015). Tapping into students' digital literacy and designing negotiated learning to promote learner autonomy. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.004
- Trust, T., Krutka, D., & Carpenter, J. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15-34. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
- Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
- Tseng, F.-C., & Kuo, F.-Y. (2014). A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers' online professional community of practice. Computers and Education, 72, 37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.005
- Van Waes, S., Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Heldens, H. H. P. F., Donche, V., Van Petegem, P., & Van den Bossche, P. (2016). The networked instructor: The quality of networks in different stages of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59(C), 295-308. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.022
- Visser, R. D., Evering, L. C., & Barrett, D. E. (2014). Twitter for teachers: The implications of Twitter as a self-directed professional development tool for K-12 teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 396-413. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2014.925694
- Warlick, D. (2009). Grow your Personal Learning Network. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(6), 12-16. Retrieved from http://www.learningandleading-digital.com/learningandleading
- Way, J. (2012). Developing a Personal Learning Network for fast and free professional learning. Access, 26(1), 16-19. Retrieved from http://www.asla.org.au/publications/access/access-national-journal.aspx
- Weeks, A. (2012). Participation power. In Rheingold, H. (Ed.), Net smart: How to thrive online (pp. 111-145). Retrieved from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/net-smart.
- Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In Blackmore, C. (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (Vol. 1, pp. Pages 179-198). doi: 10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2
- Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework(18). The Netherlands: Ruud de Moor Centrum Open University. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/11-04-Wenger_Trayner_DeLaat_Value_creation.pdf
- Whitby, T. (2013). How do I get a PLN? Edutopia. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/how-do-i-get-a-pln-tom-whitby