ror.org/02kzqn938
Abstracts
Abstract
Over the last decade, several studies have focused on massive open online courses (MOOCs). The synthesis presented here concentrates on these studies and aims to examine the place held by content in these studies, especially those produced between 2012 and 2018: sixty-five peer reviewed papers are identified through five major educational technology research journals. The analysis revealed that these research articles covered a wide diversity of content. Content was mainly defined in terms of objectives of MOOCs, prerequisites required for participation in the MOOC, types of learning scenarios, and, though rarely, through the strategies used to convey content. In addition, empirical studies adopted a variety of conceptual frameworks which focused mainly on learning strategies without relating to the content in question. Finally, content was seldom considered as a research object. These results can provide MOOC researchers and instructors with insights for the study and design of MOOCs by taking into account the specificity of their content.
Keywords:
- MOOC,
- research review,
- didactics,
- content
Download the article in PDF to read it. Download
Appendices
Bibliography
-
Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., & Van de Ven, M. (2014). Self- and peer assessment in massive open online courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 119-128.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453-474.
10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C. D., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2017). Understanding learners’ motivation and learning strategies in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 120-137. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2996
10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2996 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Rangwala, H. (2018). Needle in a haystack: Identifying learner posts that require urgent response in MOOC discussion forums. Computers & Education, 118, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.002
10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.002 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Andersen, R., & Mørch, A. I. (2009, March). Mutual development: A case study in customer- initiated software product development. In International Symposium on End User Development (pp. 31-49). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
10.1007/978-3-642-00427-8_3 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Andersen, R., & Ponti, M. (2014). Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: Challenges and opportunities. Distance Education, 35(2), 234-249. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917703
10.1080/01587919.2014.917703 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. ( 2008). Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369-386.
10.1002/pits.20303 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ashton, S., & Davies, R. S. (2015). Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing course. Distance Education, 36(3), 312-334. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733
10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 49-60.
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Barnard-Brak, L., Paton, V. O., & Lan, W. Y. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 61-80. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769
10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bogdan, R. (2017). Integrating MOOCs in embedded systems blended Courses. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 8(3), 101-107. Retrieved from http://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brain
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and patterns in massive open online courses: Review and content analysis of research on MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 119-147. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080
10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Canbek, N. G., & Hargis, J. (2015). Educational innovation in e-learning: MOOCs and OER movements in Turkey. Glokalde, 1(1), 19-32. Retrieved from http://www.glokalde.com/
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Chen, Y. H., & Chen, P. J. (2015). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55-70. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Cisel, M., & Bruillard, É. (2013). Chronique des MOOC. Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Éducation et la Formation, 19. Retrieved from http://sticef.univ-lemans.fr/
10.3406/stice.2012.1035 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Cohen, L., & Magen-Nagar, N. (2016). Self-regulated learning and a sense of achievement in MOOCs among high school science and technology students. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(2), 68-79.
10.1080/08923647.2016.1155905 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Costley, J., & Lange, C. H. (2017). The effects of lecture diversity on germane load. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 27-46. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2860
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. J. (2018). Activating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies. Computers & Education, 125, 327-344. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019
10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Delcambre, I. (2013). Contenus d’enseignement et d’apprentissages. In Y. Reuter, C. Cohen-Azria, B. Daunay, and D. Lahanier-Reuter (Eds.), Dictionnaire des concepts fondamentaux des didactiques (pp. 43-48). De Boeck Supérieur. Retrieved from https://www.cairn.info/dictionnaire-des-concepts-fondamentaux-des-didacti9782804169107.htm
10.3917/dbu.reute.2013.01 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
de Lima, M., & Zorrilla, M. E. (2017). Social networks and the building of learning communities: An experimental study of a social MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 40-64. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630
10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction. Upper Saddle River. N.J.: Merrill/Pearson.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Dysthe, O. (2001). Dialog, samspel og læring [Dialogue, interaction and learning]. Oslo: Abstrakt Forlag.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 328-345. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjem20
10.1080/17439884.2013.878352 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Engle, D., Mankoff, C., & Carbrey, J. (2015). Coursera’s introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 46-68. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2010
10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2010 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Evans, S., & Myrick, J. G. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 36(3), 295-311. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736
10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., Collins, E. D., & Sujitparapitaya, S. (2014). Case study: Using MOOCs for conventional college coursework. Distance Education, 35(2), 178-201. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917707
10.1080/01587919.2014.917707 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. doi: 10.4324/9780203838020
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Fluckiger, C., & Reuter, Y. (2014). Les contenus «informatiques» et leur(s) reconstruction(s) par des élèves de CM2. Etude didactique. Recherches en éducation, 18, 64-78. Retrieved from https://hal.univ-lille3.fr/
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Formanek, M., Wenger, M. C., Buxner, S. R., Impey, C. D., & Sonam, T. (2017). Insights about large-scale online peer assessment from an analysis of an astronomy MOOC. Computers & Education, 113, 243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.019
10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.019 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept: State of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-119.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35-41. doi: 10.2307/3033543
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 135-176. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954
10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Gillani, N., & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.004
10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.004 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Halasek, K., McCorkle, B., Selfe, C. L., DeWitt, S. L., Delagrange, S., Michaels, J., & Clinnin, K. (2014). A MOOC with a view: How MOOCs encourage us to reexamine pedagogical doxa. In S. D. Krause, & C. Lowe (Eds.). Invasion of the MOOCs: The promises and perils of massive open online courses. Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Hartnett, M., St. George, A., & Dron, J. (2011). Examining motivation in online distance learning environments: Complex, multifaceted, and situation-dependent. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 20-38. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.1030
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Hasni, A., Bousadra, F., Belletête, V., Benabdallah, A., Nicole, M. C., & Dumais, N. (2016). Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K-12 levels: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 199-231. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573
10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Henderikx, M. A., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017). Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention-behavior gap. Distance Education, 38(3), 353-368. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006
10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320-341. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12235
10.1111/bjet.12235 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157-168. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016
10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners' contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83-91.
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.019 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Huisman, B., Admiraal, W., Pilli, O., van de Ven, M., & Saab, N. (2018). Peer assessment in MOOCs: The relationship between peer reviewers’ ability and authors’ essay performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 101-110. doi: 0.1111/bjet.12520
10.1111/bjet.12520 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Israel, M. J. (2015). Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 102-118. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222
10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Jacoby, J. (2014). The disruptive potential of the massive open online course: A literature review. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 18(1), 73-85. Retrieved from http://www.jofdl.nz/
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Jiang, S., Williams, A. E., Warschauer, M., He, W., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2014). Influence of incentives on performance in a pre-college biology MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 100-112. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1858
10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1858 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kahan, T., Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2017). Types of participant behavior in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 2-18. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3087
10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3087 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kamradt, T. F., & Kamradt, E. J. (1999). Structured design for attitudinal instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kellogg, S., Booth, S., & Oliver, K. (2014). A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 264-289. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852
10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kennedy, J. (2014). Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): A research review, 2009-2012. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kwak, S. (2017). Approaches reflected in academic writing MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 139-155. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2845
10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2845 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Lebeaume, J. (2000). L'éducation technologique. Histoires et méthodes [Technological education. Stories and methods]. Paris: ESF.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 28-41. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3749
10.14742/ajet.3749 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Li, N., Verma, H., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Watching MOOCs together: Investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35(2), 217-233. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917708
10.1080/01587919.2014.917708 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K. Ø., & Williams, S. A. (2015). Who are with us: MOOC learners on a FutureLearn course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 557-569. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12261
10.1111/bjet.12261 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Marks, R.B., Sibley, S.D., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2005) A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Martinand, J. L. (2012). Éducation au Développement durable et didactiques du curriculum [Education for Sustainable Development and Curriculum Didactics]. In Conférence au XIXe Colloque AFIRSE. Lisbonne: Educagri.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 9(2), 149-159. doi: http://jolt.merlot.org/
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2016). How health professionals regulate their learning in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.005
10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.005 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 92-102. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033
10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 125, 101-119. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.006
10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.006 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Nortvig, A. M., & Christiansen, R. B. (2017). Institutional collaboration on MOOCs in education - A literature review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 307-316. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3110
10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3110 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times, 2(12), 2012. Retrieved from https://www.edinaschools.org/cms/lib/MN01909547/Centricity/Domain/272/The%20Year%20of%20the%20MOOC%20NY%20Times.pdf
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Paton, R. M., Fluck, A. E., & Scanlan, J. D. (2018). Engagement and retention in VET MOOCs and online courses: A systematic review of literature from 2013-2017. Computers & Education, 125, 191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.013
10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.013 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Phan, T., McNeil, S. G., & Robin, B. R. (2016). Students’ patterns of engagement and course performance in a massive open online course. Computers & Education, 95, 36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Pundak, D., Sabag, N., & Trotskovsky, E. (2014). Accreditation of MOOCs. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 17(2), 117-129. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org
10.2478/eurodl-2014-0023 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Raffaghelli, J. E., Cucchiara, S., & Persico, D. (2015). Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracing the myth of Proteus. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 488-509. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12279
10.1111/bjet.12279 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Rieber, L. P. (2017). Participation patterns in a massive open online course (MOOC) about statistics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1295-1304. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12504
10.1111/bjet.12504 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91-115. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743
10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Riyami, B., Mansouri, K., & Poirier, F. (2016). Towards integrating MOOC in the Moroccan higher educational system: Economic pedagogical model based on ICT for on-going education and teacher motivation. In ICERI 2016. Seville: IATED. Retrieved from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr
10.21125/iceri.2016.0572 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Rolfe, V. (2015). A systematic review of the socio-ethical aspects of massive online open courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 18(1), 52-71. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org
10.1515/eurodl-2015-0004 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 1-19. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033
10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/networks.htm
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H., Roth, N. E. W., Li, K., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Canelas, D. A. (2017). Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers & Education, 110, 35-50. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.003
10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.003 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Simonson, M. R. (1979). Designing instruction for attitudinal outcomes. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(3), 15-19. doi: 10.1007/BF02984375
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Simonson, M., & Maushak, N. (1996). Instructional technology and attitude change. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 984-1016). Mayway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2015). Implementation of Tel Aviv university MOOCs in academic curriculum: A pilot study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 80-97. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.2031
10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.2031 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Stich, A. E., & Reeves, T. D. (2017). Massive open online courses and underserved students in the United States. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.09.001
10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.09.001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Stump, G. S., DeBoer, J., Whittinghill, J., & Breslow, L. (2013). Development of a framework to classify MOOC discussion forum posts: Methodology and challenges. Proceedings of NIPS 2013 Workshop on Data Driven Education. Retrieved from http://tll.mit.edu/sites/default/files/library/Coding_a_MOOC_Discussion_Forum.pdf
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Svinicki, M. D. (2010). A guidebook for conceptual frameworks for research in engineering education. Retrieved from http://crlte.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2013/06/Svinicki-Conceptual-Frameworks.pdf
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners’ experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570-587. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12297
10.1111/bjet.12297 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2015). Who studies MOOCs? Interdisciplinarity in MOOC research and its changes over time. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 1-17. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2202
10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2202 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013-2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 199-221. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448
10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37(2), 208-223. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400
10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Wang, Z., Anderson, T., Chen, L., & Barbera, E. (2016). Interaction pattern analysis in cMOOCs based on the connectivist interaction and engagement framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 683-699. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12433
10.1111/bjet.12433 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709
10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Wang, Z. J., & Chen, L. (2015). Theory framework building of instructional interaction in connectivist learning context. The Journal of Open Educational Research, 5, 25-34. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Watson, W. R., Kim, W., & Watson, S. L. (2016). Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an animal behavior and welfare MOOC. Computers & Education, 96, 83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.013
10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.013 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Janakiraman, S., & Richardson, J. (2017). A team of instructors’ use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance strategies: An animal behaviour and welfare MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 69-91. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2663
10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2663 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Richardson, J., & Loizzo, J. (2016). Instructor’s use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance: A case study of an attitudinal change MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 55-74. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379
10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Yu, J. H., Alamri, H., & Mueller, C. (2017). Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 114, 274-285. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.005
10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.005 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Watted, A., & Barak, M. (2018). Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001
10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Wise, A. F., Cui, Y., Jin, W., & Vytasek, J. (2017). Mining for gold: Identifying content-related MOOC discussion threads across domains through linguistic modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 11-28. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.001
10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Wong, B. T. M. (2016). Factors leading to effective teaching of MOOCs. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 105-118. Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.co
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Xu, B., Zhang, Y., Li, F., & Yang, D. (2015). MOOC Ke Cheng Lun Tan Zhong Xue Xi Zhe Lun Tan Jiao Hu Wang Luo Jie Gou Te Zheng Fen Xi [The structural analysis of interactive network formed MOOC discussion forums]. Computer Education, 15, 23-35. doi: 10.16512/j.cnki.jsjjy.2015.15.007
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Yang, Q. (2014). Students motivation in asynchronous online discussions with MOOC mode. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(5), 325-330.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Yang, H. H., & Su, C. H. (2017). Learner behaviour in a MOOC practice-oriented course: In empirical study integrating TAM and TPB. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 36-63. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2991
10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2991 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., & Jakobs, H. (2014). A review of the state-of-the-art. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. Barcelona: SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Zaid, A (2017). Élaborer, transmettre et construire des contenus scientifiques et technologiques. Perspective didactique des dispositifs d'éducation et de formation [Develop, transmit and build scientific content and technology. Didactic perspective of education and training systems]. Rennes: PUR.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What research says about MOOCs - An explorative content analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 243-259. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356
10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Zhang, J. (2016). Can MOOCs be interesting to students? An experimental investigation from regulatory focus perspective. Computers & Education, 95, 340-351. doi: /10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.003
10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.003 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Zhang, J., Skryabin, M., & Song, X. (2016). Understanding the dynamics of MOOC discussion forums with simulation investigation for empirical network analysis (SIENA). Distance Education, 37(3), 270-286. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1226230
10.1080/01587919.2016.1226230 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92, 194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014-2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.002
10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.002 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar