Abstracts
Abstract
This article covers a topic related to increases in the existing heterogeneity of the university student population, specifically in virtual learning environments. There is a growing concern for offering training alternatives that include all students. As the first step in a line of research related to quality, equity, and inclusion in e-learning, we aim to identify emerging trends in research on inclusive virtual education (IVE) at the higher education level and how inclusion is conceptualized. Our goal is to provide ideas on future research topics and raise issues for further exploration. This research was conducted through a systematic review of articles published in the last decade in the WOS and Scopus databases. Upon reflection, we suggest the need for inclusive e-learning educational designs with greater emphasis on human diversity in all of its complexity. By doing so, we may be able to contribute to increasing the equality of educational opportunities and overcoming the barriers that restrict the access, continuity, and successful exit of the entire student population, regardless of their individual learning needs.
Keywords:
- inclusive e-learning,
- e-learning and accessibility,
- inclusive virtual education,
- inclusive Web design
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). The effect of universal design for learning (UDL) application on e-learning acceptance: A structural equation model. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 54-87. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2880
- Allison, M. & Turner, S. (2017). Designing a community aware virtual learning infrastructure for STEM. ISEC 2017: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference24, 30-33. doi: 10.1109/ISECon.2017.7910244
- Almeida, A., Santos, R., Batista, J., Pereira, D. & Sousa, C. (2016). Digital media as a driver of a more inclusive higher education: Towards a proposal of an action plan. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, 127-133. doi: 10.1145/3019943.3019962
- Amado-Salvatierra, H., & Hilera, J. (2015). Towards an approach for an accessible and inclusive virtual education using ESVI-AL project results. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12 (3), 158-168. doi: 10.1108/ITSE-04-2015-0005
- Cáceres, P. (2003). Análisis cualitativo de contenido: Una alternativa metodológica alcanzable [Qualitative content analysis: An achievable methodological alternative]. Psicoperspectivas, II, 53-82. Retrieved from http://www.psicoperspectivas.cl/index.php/psicoperspectivas/article/viewFile/3/3
- Calvo, R., Iglesias, A., & Castaño, L. (2017). Evaluation of accessibility barriers and learning features in m-learning chat applications for users with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(3), 593-607. doi: 10.1007/s10209-016-0484-x
- Colás-Bravo, P., & Lozano, J. (2011). Escuelas inclusivas y TIC [Inclusive schools and ICTs. Communication and Pedagogy Magazine]. Revista comunicación y Pedagogía, 249, 15-20. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/262154
- Echeíta, G., & Ainscow, M. (2011).La educacion inclusiva como derecho [Inclusive education as a right]. Tejuelo,(12), 26-46. Retrieved from https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/661330
- Echeíta, G., Simón, C., López, M., & Urbina, C.(2013). Educación inclusiva. Sistemas de referencia, coordenadas y vértices de un proceso dilemático [Inclusive education. Reference systems, coordinates and vertices of a controversial process]. En Verdugo, M. y Shalock, R. (coords). Discapacidad en Inclusión [Disability in inclusion]. Cap.14). Salamanca: Amaru.
- Fermín, M. (2011). Atención pedagógica a la diversidad en la formación docente: Revisión critica en el contexto venezolano [Pedagogical attention to diversity in child educator training: Critical review in the Venezuelan context]. Germany: Editorial Academica Española.
- Fermín, M. (2013). Las personas con discapacidad en el ámbito universitario: Una mirada de la interacción profesor-estudiante desde el modelo social [University action for people with disabilities: Account of an experience from the interaction between teacher and student based on the Social Model]. Caracas: Fondo Editorial de Humanidades. Universidad Central de Venezuela.
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Co.
- Granic, A., & Adams, R. (2011). User sensitive research in e-learning: Exploring the role of individual user characteristics. Universal Access in the Information Society, 10(3), 307-318. doi: 10.1007/S10209-010-0207-7
- Krull, G., & Duart, J. (2017). Research trends in mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review of articles (2011-2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), 1-23. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.2893
- Lalla, S. (2015). Practicing low-context communication strategies in online course design for international students studying in the U.S. Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning, 199-202. Spain.
- Lebeničnik, M., Pitt, I., & Starčič, A. (2015). Use of online learning resources in the development of learning environments at the intersection of formal and informal learning: The students as autonomous designer. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(2), 95-113.
- Moreira, D. (2016). From on-campus to online: A trajectory of innovation, internationalization and inclusion. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 186-198. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2384
- Moreira, J., Reis-Monteiro, A., & Machado, A. (2017). Higher education distance learning and e-learning in prison in Portugal. Comunicar Open Access, 25(51), 39-49. doi: 10.3916/C51-2017-04
- Parrish, P., & Linder-VanBerschot, J. (2010). Cultural dimensions of learning: Addressing the challenges of multicultural instruction. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(2), 1-19. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v11i2.809
- Radovan, M., & Perdih, M. (2016). Developing guidelines for evaluating the adaptation of accessible Web-based learning materials. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 166-181. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2463
- Sadykova, G. (2014). Mediating knowledge through peer-to-peer interaction in a multicultural online learning environment: A case study of international students in the US. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), 24-49. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1629
- Sánchez, A., & Pulido, R. (2007). El centro educativo: Una organización de y para la diversidad [The educational center: an organization of and for diversity]. Granada, Spain: Grupo Editorial Universitario.
- Santos, O., & Boticario, J. (2015). Practical guidelines for designing and evaluating educationally oriented recommendations. Computers and Education, 81, 354-374. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.008
- Santos, O., Rodríguez, A., Boticario, J., Salmeron-Majadas, S., Quirós, P., & Cabestrero, R. (2013). Challenges for inclusive affective detection in educational scenarios. In C. Stephanidis & M. Antona (Eds.), UAHCI/HCII 2013 (pp. 566-575). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39188-0-61
- Shimoni, R., Barrington, G., Wilde, R., & Henwood, S. (2013). Addressing the needs of diverse distributed students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 134-157. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1413
- UNESCO. (2001). The open file on inclusive education. Paris: UNESCO.
- UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030. Incheon declaration and frame work for action for the implementation of sustainable development goal 4. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/aric/48223/pf0000245656