While adaptive learning is emerging as a promising technology to promote access and quality at a large scale in higher education (Becker et al., 2018), the implementation of adaptive learning in teaching and learning is still sporadic, and it is unclear how to best design and teach an adaptive learning course in a higher education context. As early adopters, a team of instructors, instructional designers, and administrators at the University of Central Florida (UCF) identified five key design features as an adaptive learning design framework to guide the unique course design process. These five features involve deliberate design and development efforts that could bring significant benefits to student learning. The purpose of this field note is to present a design framework and best practices for teaching from both a systems and a pedagogical approach in the context of implementation at UCF. We also share the rationale and classification framework UCF has adopted to ensure the term “adaptive learning” is universally understood across campus. This paper offers insights into the design, delivery, and implications of utilizing adaptive learning systems in higher education courses at a public research university and attempts to capture the intimacy of lessons learned and best practices gathered since the project’s inception in 2014.
- adaptive courseware,
- adaptive learning,
- course design,
- higher education,
- instructional design,
- learning analytics,
- mastery learning,
- personalized learning
Download the article in PDF to read it.
- Ait Maalem Lahcen, R. (2019). MAC1105C: College Algebra. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida.
- Aleven, V., Mclaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). A new paradigm for intelligent tutoring systems: Example-tracing tutors. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19(2), 105-154. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1734243.1734245
- Anderson, J. (2019, November 4). Busting the top 5 myths about adaptive learning [Realizeit Blog]. Retrieved November 5, 2019, from Realizeit website: http://blog.realizeitlearning.com/blog/top-5-myths-about-adaptive-learning
- Association of Public & Land-Grant Universities. (2017a). Personalizing learning with adaptive courseware. Retrieved from http://www.aplu.org/projects-and-initiatives/personalized-learning-consortium/plc-projects/plc-adaptive-courseware/
- Association of Public & Land-Grant Universities. (2017b). APLU adaptive aourseware grant program: Approved adaptive courseware suppliers and products. Retrieved from https://www.aplu.org/projects-and-initiatives/personalized-learning-consortium/plc-projects/plc-adaptive-courseware/Approved_Adaptive_Courseware_Suppliers_and_Products_2017.pdf
- Baker, R. S. (2016). Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 600-614. doi: 10.1007/s40593-016-0105-0
- Becker, S. A., Brown, M., Dahlstrom, E., Davis, A., DePaul, K., Diaz, V., & Pomerantz, J. (2018). 2018 NMC Horizon report: 2018 Higher education edition. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2018/8/2018-nmc-horizon-report
- Brusco, R. (2018). Personalized learning at its best (Blog post). Edutopa. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/personalized-learning-its-best
- Buhagiar, T. (2018). Module 6: Simple linear regression. In QMB3200: Quantitative Business Tools II. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida
- CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org
- Center for Distributed Learning (2019). Types of courses at UCF. Retrieved from https://cdl.ucf.edu/support/student/modalities/
- Chen, B. (2019). Module 5: Learner assessments. In EME6613: Instructional Systems Design. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida.
- Chen, B., Bastedo, K., Kirkley, D., Stull, C., & Tojo, J. (2017, August) Designing personalized adaptive learning courses at the University of Central Florida (Eli Brief). EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/8/designing-personalized-adaptive-learning-courses-at-the-university-of-central-florida
- Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Johnson, C., & Evans, D. (2017). Adaptive learning: A tale of two contexts. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 4(1), 3. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol4/iss1/3
- Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Parker, L., Campbell, M., Howlin, C., & Johnson, C. (2018). Adaptive learning: A stabilizing influence across disciplines and universities. Online Learning, 22(3), 7-39. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1191489
- Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019, September). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821936116
- Edsurge. (2016). Decoding adaptive. Pearson. Retrieved from https://www.pearson.com/corporate/about-pearson/innovation/smarter-digital-tools/adaptive-learning.html
- Edwards, M., Johnson, D., Ford, C., Pugliese, L., Fritz, J., & Birk, S. (2017). From adaptive to adaptable: The next generation for personalized learning. IMS Global Learning Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.imsglobal.org/adaptive-adaptable-next-generation-personalized-learning
- Essa, A. (2016). A possible future for next generation adaptive learning systems. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 16. doi: 10.1186/s40561-016-0038-y
- Essa, A., & Laster, S. (2017). Bloom’s 2 Sigma problem and data-driven approaches for improving student success. In R. Feldman (Ed.), The first year of college: Research, theory, and practice on improving the student experience and increasing retention (pp. 212-246). Cambridge: Cambridge University. doi: 10.1017/9781316811764.009
- Hinkle, J. (2017). Case study: Endocrine. In NUR3125: Pathophysiology for Nursing Practice. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida.
- Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gasevic, D. (2020). Development and adoption of an adaptive learning system. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Portland, OR. doi: 10.1145/3328778.3366900
- Muhs, T. (2018). Equations with one variable. In MAC1055: College Algebra. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida.
- Pavlik Jr, P., Brawner, K., Olney, A., & Mitrovic, A. (2013). A review of learner models used in intelligent tutoring systems. In R. Sottilare, A. Graesser, X. Hu, and H. Holden (Eds.), Adaptive Tutoring Series : Vol. 1. Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 39-68). Orlando, Florida: U.S. Army Research Laboratory. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Phil_Pavlik_Jr/publication/258883086_A_Review_of_Learner_Models_Used_in_Intelligent_Tutoring_Systems/links/0deec52950ce7f24c2000000/A-Review-of-Learner-Models-Used-in-Intelligent-Tutoring-Systems.pdf
- Pugliese, L. (2016, October 17). Adaptive learning systems: Surviving the storm (Blog post). EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/10/adaptive-learning-systems-surviving-the-storm
- Thompson, J. (2013). Types of adaptive learning. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/351803604/Adaptive-Learning-Types-of-Adaptive-Learning
- Weber, N. (2019). Adaptive learning: Understanding its progress and potential. Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2019/4/2019-horizon-report
- Willcox, K. E., & Huang, L (2017). Network models for mapping educational data. Design Science, 3(18). Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/design-science/article/network-models-for-mapping-educational-data/B144B697F0998F36C445054DCA4DEA4F
- Yarnall, L., Means, B., & Wetzel, T. (2016). Lessons learned from early implementations of adaptive courseware (SRI Project Nos. 21987 and 22997). California: SRI Education. Retrieved from https://www.sri.com/sites/default/files/brochures/almap_final_report.pdf