Open educational resources (OER), are openly licensed text, media, and other digital and analog assets that are useful for teaching, learning, and research. Recent research has shown that in courses where open textbooks are assigned, students perform as well as or better than students in similar courses with commercially licensed textbooks. Despite cost savings and demonstrated effectiveness, perceptions about quality, relevance, ease of access, and other concerns persist. The objectives of this study were twofold: (a) to develop a practical and reusable measure for evaluating open textbook quality in terms of pedagogy, openness, accessibility, and relevance; and (b) to use the measure to rate the quality and relevance of open textbooks for use in higher education in The Bahamas. The study confirmed the viability of the quality measure as a practical tool to assess open resources and found that the open textbooks studied were accessible and well matched to course content, but of varying quality. More study is needed to explore ways to increase faculty adoption, use, adaption and production of OER.
- open educational resources,
- Albright, P. (2005). Internet discussion forum: Open educational resources, open content for higher education. Final forum report. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning. Retrieved from https://docs.iiep.unesco.org/I009621.pdf
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016, July). Opening the textbook: Educational resources in U.S. higher education, 2015-16 : Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthetextbook2016.pdf
- Alsagoff, Z. A. (2016). Is the quality of open textbooks equal to that of commercial textbooks? Retrieved from http://discourse.col.org/t/is-the-quality-of-open-textbooks-equal-to-that-of-commercial-textbooks/139
- BCcampus. (n.d.). Advocating for open education Retrieved from https://open.bccampus.ca/advocate-for-open-education/advocating-for-open-education/
- Bliss, T. J., Hilton, J., III, Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of online open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18(1). doi: 10.5210/fm.v18i1.3972
- Butcher, N., & Moore, M. (2015). Understanding open educational resources. Vancouver, BC: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/1013/2015_Butcher_Moore_Understanding-OER.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- College Board. (2015). Trends in college pricing 2015. Retrieved from http://trends.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/2015-trends-college-pricing-final-508.pdf
- Commonwealth of Learning. (2012). Fostering governmental support for OER internationally (FGSOERI): Caribbean. Vancouver, BC: Commonwealth of Learning and UNESCO. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/704/FGSOERI_Caribbean-Summary-Report_1201.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Cape Town Open Education Declaration. (2007, September 15). Retrieved from https://www.capetowndeclaration.org/read-the-declaration
- D’Antoni, S. (2006, June 13). Open educational resources: Deliberations of a community of interest (Keynote address). The International Council for Open and Distance Education Standing Conference of Presidents, Rectors, and Chief Executive Officers, Lillehammer, Norway. Retrieved from https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/OER_DeliberationsofaCommunityofInterest.pdf
- Eberly Center. (2019). The educational value of course-level learning objectives/outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/resources/Teaching/CourseDesign/Objectives/CourseLearningObjectivesValue.pdf
- Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Fischer, L., Ernst, D., & Mason, S. L. (2017). Rating the quality of open textbooks: How reviewer and text characteristics predict ratings. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 142-154. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.2985
- Florida Virtual Campus. (2016). 2016 Florida student textbook survey. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Virtual Campus. Retrieved from https://florida.theorangegrove.org/og/items/3a65c507-2510-42d7-814c-ffdefd394b6c/1/
- George, N. (2015). Technology-Enabled learning in the Commonwealth Caribbean countries: A baseline study. Vancouver, BC: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/1210
- Green, C. (2014). Open education: The moral, business and policy case for OER. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/cgreen/updated-keynote-slides-october-2014
- Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 9-34. doi: 10.1080/0260293930180102
- Hatakka, M. (2009). Build it and they will come? Inhibiting factors for reuse of open content in developing countries. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 37(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00260.x
- Hilton, J., III. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1(18), 573-590. doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
- Hodgkinson-Williams, C. A., & Trotter, H. (2018). A social justice framework for understanding open educational resources and practices in the global south. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 204-224. Retrieved from https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/312
- Hoosen, S. (2012). Survey on governments’ open educational resources (OER) policies. Vancouver, BC: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/291
- Jung, E., Bauer, C., & Heaps, A. (2017). Higher education faculty perceptions of open textbook adoption. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 123-141. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3120
- Kawachi, P. (2014). Quality assurance guidelines for open educational resources: TIPS framework. New Delhi, India: The Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/562
- Larson, R. C., & Murray, E. (2008) Open educational resources for blended learning in high schools: Overcoming impediments in developing countries. Journal for Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 85-103. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/104082/
- Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760-769. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.63.8.760
- Ministry of Education. (2017). ICT in education strategic plan. Unpublished policy document.
- Mishra, S. (2017). Promoting use and contribution of open educational resources. New Delhi, India: Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/2659/2017_Mishra_Promoting-Use-Contribution-of-OER.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- OpenStax CNX. (2019). About us. Retrieved from https://cnx.org/about
- Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010). Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher, 39(5), 406-412. doi: 10.3102/0013189X10374770
- University of The Bahamas. (2017). University of The Bahamas: Tuition and fees. Retrieved from http://www.ub.edu.bs/admissions/tuition-fees/
- Vander Waal Mills, K. E., Gucinski, M., & Vander Waal, K. (2019). Implementation of open textbooks in community and technical college biology courses: The good, the bad, and the data. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(3). doi: 10.1187%2Fcbe.19-01-0022
- Wiley, D. (2017). The evolving economics of educational materials and open educational resources: Toward closer alignment with the core values of education. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed.; pp. 314-322). New York, NY: Pearson Education.
- Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open educational resources: A review of the literature. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 781-789). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_63