Abstracts
Abstract
The recent unexpected impact of the global pandemic on higher education has caused universities, governments, students, and teachers to reexamine all components of existing systems, including how to become more effective and efficient in using technologies for education. We have seen that moving classes online—either blended or fully online—can be done rapidly, but early reports show huge variations in quality, acceptance, completion, and learning. Thus, it is important to examine the existing research literature on pedagogical innovations and practices that use technologies. To understand this complex situation, the present study examines the current technological, organisational, and pedagogical trends and challenges using an exploratory design carried out in three stages. In stage one, a literature review of the academic and grey literature was conducted, identifying 14 trends of interest. These trends were used in a workshop and interview discussion between leading experts in the higher education field. Stage two focused on identifying 108 initiatives that represent these trends. Finally, 30 of these were selected as cases for further exploration in stage three. Using thematic analysis, the 30 cases were condensed into 12 main themes that represent the innovative practices that led to development of the IDEAS framework as a signpost on the roadmap of next-generation pedagogy for transforming higher education. IDEAS is presented in the discussion alongside examples and ways to apply it in higher education contexts.
Keywords:
- higher education,
- educational technology,
- trends and challenges in higher education,
- higher education transformation,
- next-generation pedagogy,
- strategic and organizational planning
Appendices
Bibliography
- Amhag, L., Hellström, L., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher educators’ use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(4), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169
- Baldwin, S. J., & Ching, Y.-H. (2019). Online course design: A review of the Canvas Course Evaluation Checklist. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i3.4283
- Bates, T. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing and learning (2nd ed.). Tony Bates Associates Limited. https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/teaching-in-a-digital-age-guidelines-for-designing-teaching-and-learning-for-a-digital-age
- Bates, T. (2020, March 9). Advice to those about to teach online because of the corona-virus. Tony Bates. Retrieved February 26, 2021, from https://www.tonybates.ca/2020/03/09/advice-to-those-about-to-teach-online-because-of-the-corona-virus/
- Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., & Agostinho, S. (2018). Towards sustainable technology‐enhanced innovation in higher education: Advancing learning design by understanding and supporting teacher design practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1014-1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12683
- Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, D., Jr., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, A. J., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P. ... Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126. https://www.asianjde.org/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/462
- Brandenburg, U., de Wit, H., Jones, E., Leask, B., & Drobner, A. (2020). Internationalization in Higher Education for Society (IHES): Concept, current research and examples of good practice. DAAD Studies. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). https://static.daad.de/media/daad_de/pdfs_nicht_barrierefrei/der-daad/analysen-studien/daad_s15_studien_ihes_web.pdf
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Brown, M., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Brook, D. C., Grajek, S., Alexander, B., Bulger, S., Dark, S., Engelbert, N., Gannon, K., Gauthier, A., Gibson, D., Gibson, R., Lundin, B., Veletsianos, G., & Weber, K. (2020). 2020 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2020/3/2020_horizon_report_pdf.pdf?la=en&hash=08A92C17998E8113BCB15DCA7BA1F467F303BA80
- Brown, N., & Boorman, S. (2009). Changing landscapes: Future scenarios for variable tuition fees. Universities UK. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/26285/1/ChangingLandscapes.pdf
- Chetty, K., Qigui, L., Gcora, N., Josie, J., Wenwei, L., & Fang, C. (2018). Bridging the digital divide: Measuring digital literacy. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 12(23), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-23
- Cruz-Jesus, F., Vicente, M. R., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). The education-related digital divide: An analysis for the EU-28. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.027
- Damewood, A. M. (2016). Current trends in higher education technology: Simulation. TechTrends, 60(3), 268-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0048-1
- DeVries, I. J. (2019). Open universities and open educational practices: A content analysis of open university websites. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(4), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4215
- De Wit, H., Hunter, F., Howard, L., & Egron-Polak, E. (2015). Internationalization of higher education. EU Directorate-General for Internal Policies. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/540370/IPOL_STU%282015%29540370_EN.pdf
- Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017). Teaching with technology in higher education: Understanding conceptual change and development in practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300
- Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010
- Gasevic, D. (2020, April 26). COVID-19: The steep learning curve for online education. LENS. https://lens.monash.edu/@education/2020/04/26/1380195/covid-19-the-steep-learning-curve-for-online-education
- Gehanno, J. F., Rollin, L., & Darmoni, S. (2013). Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-7
- Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293
- Goh, C. F., Hii, P. K., Tan, O. K., & Rasli, A. (2020). Why do university teachers use e-learning systems? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 136-155. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.3720
- Guàrdia, L. & Maina, M. (2018). FUTURA - Next generation pedagogy. IDEAS for Online and Blended Higher Education. In G. Ubachs & L. Konings (Eds.), The envisioning report for empowering universities (pp. 28-30). EADTU. http://empower.eadtu.eu/images/report/The_Envisioning_Report_for_Empowering_Universities_2nd_edition_2018.pdf
- Haywood, J., Connelly, L., Henderikx, P., Weller, M., & Williams, K. (2015). The changing pedagogical landscape: New ways of teaching and learning and their implications for higher education policy. EADTU. https://eadtu.eu/home/policy-areas/lifelong-learning/publications/404-the-changing-pedagogical-landscape
- Henderikx, P., & Jansen, D. (2018). The changing pedagogical landscape: In search of patterns in policies and practices of new modes of teaching and learning. EADTU. https://eadtu.eu/documents/Publications/LLL/2018_-_The_Changing_Pedagogical_Landscape.pdf
- Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
- Howland, J. L., Wright, T. C., Boughan, R. A., & Roberts, B. C. (2008). How scholarly is Google Scholar? A comparison of Google Scholar to library databases. College and Research Libraries, 70(3), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.5860/0700227
- Jääskelä, P., Häkkinen, P., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017). Teacher beliefs regarding learning, pedagogy, and the use of technology in higher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1343691
- Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). US faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285
- Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2014). Blue ocean leadership. Harvard business review, 92(5), 60-72.
- Marshall, S. J. (2018). Technology and modern students—The digital natives fallacy. In S. J. Marshall (Ed.), Shaping the university of the future (pp. 197-211). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7620-6_10
- O’Keefe, L., Rafferty, J., Gunder, A., & Vignare, K. (2020). Delivering high-quality instruction online in response to COVID-19: Faculty playbook. Online Learning Consortium. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/tools/delivering-high-quality-instruction-in-response-to-covid-19-faculty-playbook/
- Phoong, S. Y., Phoong, S. W., Moghavvemi, S., & Sulaiman, A. (2019). Effect of smart classroom on student achievement at higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(2), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519870721
- Ponomarenko, E., Oganesyan, A., & Teslenko, V. (2019). New trends in higher education: Massive open online courses as an innovative tool for increasing university performance. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 12(4), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEPEE.2019.104635
- Posselt, T., Abdelkafi, N., Fischer, L., & Tangour, C. (2018). Opportunities and challenges of higher education institutions in Europe: An analysis from a business model perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(1), 100-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12192
- Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
- Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (2020). Prerequisites for artificial intelligence in further education: Identification of drivers, barriers, and business models of educational technology companies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00193-3
- Romero-Moreno, L. M. (2019). Analysis of the collaboration that is produced in online learning using Python technology. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/jisem/6351
- Ruano‐Borbalan, J. C. (2019). Innovation in higher education: Actors, policies and pedagogical effects. European Journal of Education, 54(4), 493-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12371
- Sangrà, A., Guàrdia, L., & Fernández-Michels, P. (2009). Matching technology, organisation and pedagogy in e-learning: Looking for the appropriate balance leading to sustainability and effectiveness. In M. Stansfield & T. Connolly (Eds.), Institutional transformation through best practices in virtual campus development (pp. 95-114). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-358-6.ch007
- Stefaniak, J., & Carey, K. (2019). Instilling purpose and value in the implementation of digital badges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0175-9
- Sutton, K. K., & DeSantis, J. (2017). Beyond change blindness: Embracing the technology revolution in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1174592
- Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
- Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027
- Vryonides, S., Papastavrou, E., Charalambous, A., Andreou, P., & Merkouris, A. (2014). The ethical dimension of nursing care rationing: A thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Nursing Ethics, 22(8), 881-900. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733014551377
- Walder, A. M. (2017). Pedagogical innovation in Canadian higher education: Professors’ perspectives on its effects on teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.11.001
- Watty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2016). Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, 36, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003
- Westine, C. D., Oyarzun, B., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Casto, A., Okraski, C., Park, G., Person, J., & Steele, L. (2019). Familiarity, current use, and interest in universal design for learning among online university instructors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4258
- Wicks, D., & Lumpe, A. (2015). Electronic Portfolios as Pedagogy: Using bPortfolios for Authentic Assessment of Teacher Knowledge and Skills in the U.S. International Teacher Education: Promising Pedagogies, 22C, 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-368720150000022011
- Wohlin, C. (2014, May). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Article 38. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268