Abstracts
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of integrating community of inquiry (COI) framework principles with flipped classroom pedagogy to enhance students’ perceived presence sense, self-regulated learning, and learning performance. A quasi-experimental study was conducted to examine whether integrating COI framework principles with flipped classrooms could enhance college students’ perceived presence sense, self-regulated learning, and learning performance. The participants were 64 third-year male college students in an online course at a teacher education university in Iran in 2021. The study employed the COI Survey, the online self-regulated learning questionnaire (OLSQ), and a teacher-made test to measure learning performance. The results indicated significant between-group differences in perceived presence sense, self-regulated learning, and learning performance (p < 0.001). Integrating COI framework principles with flipped classroom pedagogy was an effective approach to enhancing perceived presence sense, self-regulated learning, and learning performance among teacher education students.
Keywords:
- online education,
- flipped classroom,
- community of inquiry,
- self-regulated learning,
- teacher education
Download the article in PDF to read it. Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Antonio, R. L. B. (2022). Assessing flipped classroom in flexible learning via community of inquiry framework. ETERNAL (English Teaching Learning and Research Journal), 8(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V81.2022.A6Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Arbaugh, J. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.490Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ash, K. (2012) Educators view 'flipped' model’ with a more critical Eye. Education Week, 32(2), 6-8. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1038758423Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ay, K., & Dağhan, G. (2023). The effect of the flipped learning approach designed with community of inquiry model to the development of students’ critical thinking strategies and social, teaching and cognitive presences. Education and Information Technologies, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11809-2Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5/6), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Bergmann%2C+J.%2C+%26+Sams%2C+A.+%282012%29.+Flip+your+classroom%3A+Reach+every+student+in+every+class+every+day.+International+Ssociety+for+Ttechnology+in+Eeducation&btnG=Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23.1200.1–23.1200.18). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Boucher, B., Robertson, E., Wainner, R., & Sanders, B. (2013). “Flipping” Texas State University’s physical therapist musculoskeletal curriculum: Implementation of a hybrid learning model. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 27(3), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001416-201307000-00010Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Branon, R. F., & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education. TechTrends, 45(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02763377Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33–43. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/beaccr/v6y2014i1p33-43.htmlGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers & Education, 157, 103966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103966Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Chen, C. H., Wu, I. C., & Jen, F. L. (2013). Designing online scaffolds for interactive computer simulation. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.549831Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Chen, H. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2017). Integrating the SOP2 model into the flipped classroom to foster cognitive presence and learning achievements. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 274–291. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Chen%2C+H.+L.%2C+%26+Chang%2C+C.+Y.+%282017%29.+Integrating+the+SOP2+&btnG=Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Chiu, C. M., Sun, S. Y., Sun, P. C., & Ju, T. L. (2007). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of Web-based learning continuance. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1224–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.010Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cho, M. H., & Kim, B. J. (2013). Students’ self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.001Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00392.xGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 57(6), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0698-1Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Estelami, H. (2012). An exploratory study of the drivers of student satisfaction and learning experience in hybrid-online and purely online marketing courses. Marketing Education Review, 22(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.2753/MER1052-8008220204Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Filiz, O., & Kurt, A. A. (2015). Flipped learning: Misunderstandings and the truth. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 5(1), 215–229. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/698200Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American journal of distance education, 19(3), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Grau, V., & Whitebread, D. (2012). Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 401–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.003Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Günbatar, M. S. (2021). Flipped classroom in higher education: Evaluation of the process in the framework of community of inquiry. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 215–254. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00472395211031660Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Herrera Díaz, L. E., & González Miy, D. (2017). Developing the oral skill in online English courses framed by the community of inquiry. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 19(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n1.55957Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-zGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Horn, M. B. (2013). The transformational potential of flipped classrooms. Education Next, 13(3), 78–79. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&title=The%20transformational%20potential%20of%20flipped%20classrooms&journal=Education%20Next&volume=13&issue=3&pages=78-79&publication_year=2013&author=Horn%2CMBGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hu, H., & Driscoll, M. P. (2013). Self-regulation in e-learning environments: A remedy for community college? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 171–184. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-40972-014Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jia, C., Hew, K. F., Bai, S., & Huang, W. (2021). Adaptation of a conventional flipped course to an online flipped format during the COVID-19 pandemic: Student learning performance and engagement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1847220Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kazanidis, I., Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., & Tsinakos, A. (2019). Can the flipped classroom model improve students’ academic performance and training satisfaction in higher education instructional media design courses? British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 2014–2027. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12694Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Khalid, N. M. (2014). Factors affecting course satisfaction of online Malaysian university students [Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University]. http://hdl.handle.net/10217/88444Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kustandi, C., Wargahadibrata, H., Fadhillah, D. N., & Nursetyo, K. I. (2020). Flipped classroom for improving self-regulated learning of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i09.11858Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9056-2Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. (2009). Generative learning strategies and metacognitive feedback to facilitate comprehension of complex science topics and self-regulation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(1), 5–25. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/26119/.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lee, Y. H., & Kim, K. J. (2018). Enhancement of student perceptions of learner-centeredness and community of inquiry in flipped classrooms. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1347-3Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lipponen, L. (2002, January). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 72–81). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1658616.1658627Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lucke, T. (2014). Using learning analytics to evaluate the effectiveness of the flipped classroom approach. In Proceedings of the 2014 Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (pp. 1–9). Massey University. https://research.usc.edu.au/esploro/outputs/99449946502621Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2249066Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20130919-03Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mortensen, C. J., & Nicholson, A. (2014, July). Improved student achievement through gamification and the flipped classroom. In ADSA-ASAS Joint Annual Meeting. Kansas City, MO. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268088137_Improved_student_achievement_through_gamification_and_the_flipped_classroomGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ng, E. M. (2018). Integrating self-regulation principles with flipped classroom pedagogy for first year university students. Computers & Education, 126, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.002Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Nguyen, L. T., & Ikeda, M. (2015). The effects of e-portfolio-based learning model on student self-regulated learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(3), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415589532Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Park, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.4.207Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1207/00461520252828519Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7610196Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pifarré, M., Guijosa, A., & Argelagós, E. (2014). Using a blog to create and support a community of inquiry in secondary education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.72Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Popescu, E., & Badea, G. (2020). Exploring a community of inquiry supported by a social media-based learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 61–76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26921134Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Rivera, E. (2015). Using the flipped classroom model in your library instruction course. The Reference Librarian, 56(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2015.977671Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Serdyukov, P., & Hill, R. (2013). Flying with clipped wings: Are students independent in online college classes. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 6(1), 54-67. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=fa&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Serdyukov%2C+P.%2C+%26+Hill%2C+R.+%282013%29.+Flying+with+clipped+wings%3A+Are+students+independent+in+online+college+classes.+Journal+of+Research+in+Innovative+Teaching%2C+6%281%29%2C+54-67&btnG=Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., Valtcheva, A., & Rangan, P. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.002Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Silva, J. C., Zambom, E., Rodrigues, R. L., Ramos, J. L., & de Souza, F. D. (2018). Effects of learning analytics on students' self-regulated learning in flipped classroom. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 14(3), 91-107. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2018070108Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sun, J. C. Y., Wu, Y. T., & Lee, W. I. (2017). The effect of the flipped classroom approach to OpenCourseWare instruction on students’ self‐regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12444Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Taghizade, A., Hatami, J., Fardanesh, H., & Noroozi, O. (2018). Validating the Persian version of the Community of Inquiry framework survey instrument in web-based learning environments. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 8(31), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.22054/jem.2018.30681.1716Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Taghizade, A., Azimi, E., & Mirzaee, R. (2020). Validity evidence for a Persian version of the online self-regulated learning questionnaire. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(1), 13-24. DOI: 10.30476/ijvlms.2020.84802.1017Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Tan, H. R., Chng, W. H., Chonardo, C., Ng, M. T. T., & Fung, F. M. (2020). How chemists achieve active learning online during the COVID-19 pandemic: Using the community of inquiry (COI) framework to support remote teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2512–2518. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00541Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Tawfik, A. A., & Lilly, C. (2015). Using a flipped classroom approach to support problem-based learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9262-8Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82–91. http://educationnext.org/the-flipped-classroom/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Whitebread, D., Bingham, S., Grau, V., Pino-Pasternak, D., & Sangster, C. (2007). Development of metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children: Role of collaborative and peer-assisted learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6, 433–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/194589507787382043Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar

