ror.org/02qp25a50
Abstracts
Abstract
The Ontario Human Rights Commission’s (OHCR) Right to Read Report calls for school districts to implement early literacy interventions that have been scientifically proven to be effective for young children with reading difficulties. The acknowledgment of early intervention as an essential service for young children experiencing reading difficulties is a strong and welcome message in the report. However, the report recommends a narrow course for reading interventions in Ontario, drawing on discourse from the Science of Reading community, which questionably frames current interventions, such as Reading Recovery, as unscientific, ineffective commercial programs. In this response, the authors contest the one-sidedness of these recommendations based on a paradox in the report between what constitutes an effective early literacy intervention supported by science and the standards for effectiveness the OHRC requires of interventions it endorses versus those it discredits. Rather than dismissing one approach or the other outright, a call is made for school leadership to consider broader reading science and the strengths of various approaches instead of narrowing the menu of effective literacy interventions that may support diverse learners.
Download the article in PDF to read it. Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Allington, R. L. (2005). How much evidence is enough evidence? Journal of Reading Recovery, 4(2), 8–11. http://www.readingrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/JRR.4.2_How_Much_Evidence-Allington.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Allington, R. L. (2007, January 29). [Review of the article Whole language high jinks: How to tell when “scientifically-based reading instruction” isn’t by Louisa Moats]. Arizona State University, Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Education Policy Research Unit. https://nepc.colorado.edu/sites/default/files/EPSL-0702-225-EPRU2.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bommarito, S. (2019, May 17). Revisiting three posts I’ve made about the reading wars: A synopsis of what I hope will become a reading evolution. Doctorsam7. https://doctorsam7.blog/2019/05/17/revisiting-three-posts-ive-made-about-the-reading-wars-a-synopsis-of-what-i-hope-will-become-a-reading-evolution-by-dr-sam-bommarito/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bommarito, S. (2022a, April 28). Why I still like Reading Recovery and more things we can learn from it (repost). Doctorsam7. https://doctorsam7.blog/2022/04/28/why-i-still-like-reading-recovery-and-more-things-we-can-learn-from-it-repost-by-dr-sam-bommarito/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bommarito, S. (2022b, November 12). Let’s stop weaponizing research and instead use ALL the research to learn from each other. (An open message to Emily Hanford and her followers). Doctorsam7. https://doctorsam7.blog/2022/11/12/lets-stop-weaponizing-research-and-instead-use-all-the-research-to-learn-from-each-other-an-open-message-to-emily-hanford-and-her-followers/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Braw, E. (2022, February 18). Is “speaking your truth” the new alternative facts? Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/03/22/speaking-your-truth-alternative-facts/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Buckingham, J. (2019, February 7). Reading Recovery: A failed investment. The Centre for Independent Studies. https://www.cis.org.au/publications/policy-papers/reading-recovery-a-failed-investment/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Burns, M. K., Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2023). Evaluating components of the active view of reading as intervention targets: Implications for social justice. School Psychology, 38(1), 30–41. https://www.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000519Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Burroughs-Lange, S., & Douetil, J. (2007). Literacy progress of young children from poor urban settings: A Reading Recovery comparison study. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 19–46. https://readingrecovery.org/research_article/literacy-progress-of-young-children-from-poor-urban-settings-a-reading-recovery-comparison-study/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery. (n.d.). Reading makes all the difference: Reading Recovery. Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery/L’institut canadien de l’intervention preventive en lecture-écriture. https://rrcanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Reading-Recovery-Brochure_Final_2018.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery. (2020). Testimonial archive. Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery/L’institut canadien de l’intervention preventive en lecture-écriture. https://rrcanada.org/testimonials/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery. (2022a, February). Standards and guidelines for Reading Recovery/IPLÉ/literacy lessons. Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery/L’institut canadien de l’intervention preventive en lecture-écriture. https://rrcanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/CIRR-Standards-and-Guidelines-6th-edition_Feb2022_include-LL.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery. (2022b, March 8). Statement on Ontario Human Rights Commision Right to Read Report. Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery/L’institut canadien de l’intervention preventive en lecture-écriture. https://rrcanada.org/statement-on-ontario-human-rights-commission-right-to-read-report/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery. (2022c, June). Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery: National impact & data report 2020–2021. Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery/L’institut canadien de l’intervention preventive en lecture-écriture. https://rrcanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CIRR-National-Data-Report_2020-21.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L., Outhred, L., & McNaught M. (1995). An experimental evaluation of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(2), 240–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/748034Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cervetti, G. N., Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Afflerbach, P., Kendeou, P., Biancarosa, G., Higgs, J., Fitzgerald, M. S., & Berman A. (2020). How the Reading for Understanding initiative’s research complicates the simple view of reading invoked in the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S161–S172. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.343Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Clay, M. M. (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22(2), 155–173.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Heinemann.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Clay, M. M. (2005). Literacy lessons designed for individuals part one: Why? when? and how? Heinemann.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Clay, M. M. (2019). An observation survey of early literacy achievement (4th ed.). Heinemann.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Compton-Lilly, C. F., Mitra, A., Guay, M., & Spence, L. K. (2021). A confluence of complexity: Intersection among reading theory, neuroscience and observations of young readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S185–S195. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.348Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Connor, C. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2016). Individualizing student instruction in reading: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624931Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cox, B. E., & Hopkins, C. J. (2006). Building on theoretical principles gleaned in Reading Recovery to inform classroom practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(2), 254–267. https://www.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.2.5Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cummins, J. (2022). Ontario Human Rights Commission Right to Read report: Sincere, passionate, flawed. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v16i1.7279Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- D’Agostino, J. V., & Harmey, S. J. (2016). An international meta-analysis of Reading Recovery, Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 21(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2015.1112746Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- D’Agostino, J. V., & Murphy, J. A. (2004). A meta-analysis of Reading Recovery in United States schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 23–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699502Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Davenport, D., & Jones, J. M. (2005). The politics of literacy. Policy Review, 130, 45–57. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ682505.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- De Ridder, J. (2014). Science and scientism in popular science writing. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 12(3), 23–39. http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-1KEGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Doyle, M. (2019). Marie M. Clay’s theoretical perspective: A literacy processing theory. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, M. Sailors, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of literacy (7th ed., pp. 84–100). Routledge.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (2013). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 339–361). International Reading Association.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Empower Reading and Learning Group. (2022). Empower reading and learning group. SickKids. https://www.sickkids.ca/en/learning/empower-reading/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Akhavan, N. (2020). This is balanced literacy: Grades K–6. Corwin.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2009). Leveled literacy intervention: Program guide, green system. Heinemann.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2011). Benchmark assessment system 1. Heinemann.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2016). Prompting guide part 1 for oral reading and early writing. Heinemann.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2017). The Fountas & Pinnell literacy continuum: A tool for assessment, planning, and teaching, expanded edition. Heinemann.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gabriel, R. (2021, May 1). The sciences of reading instruction. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-sciences-of-reading-instructionGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gamse, B. C., Jacob, R. T., Horst, M., Boulay, B., Unlu, F., Bozzi, L., Caswell, L., Rodger, C., Carter Smith, W. C., Brigham, N., & Rosenblum, S. (2009). Reading First impact study final report (NCEE 2009–4038). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20094038_1.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gilmore, A., Croft, C., & Reid, N. (1981). The Burt Word Reading Test. New Zealand Council for Education Research. https://www.nzcer.org.nz/tests/burt-word-reading-testGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Goldberg, M. (2019, December 18). Balanced literacy’s crumbling foundation – what we can do about it. Reading Rockets. https://www.readingrockets.org/blogs/right-read/balanced-literacy-s-crumbling-foundation-what-we-can-do-about-itGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Goodwin, A. P., & Jiménez, R. T. (Eds.) (2020). The science of reading: Supports, critiques, and questions part 1 [Special issue]. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1). https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/19362722/2020/55/S1Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Goodwin, A. P., & Jiménez, R. T. (Eds.) (2021). The science of reading: Supports, critiques, and questions part 2 [Special issue]. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1). https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/19362722/2021/56/S1Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hanford, E. (2019, January 2). Why millions of kids can’t read and what better teaching can do about it. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2019/01/02/677722959/why-millions-of-kids-cant-read-and-what-better-teaching-can-do-about-itGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hanford, E. (Host). (2022, October 20). Sold a story: How teaching kids to read went so wrong. (No. 1–5) [Audio podcast]. APMreports. Minnesota Public Radio. https://features.apmreports.org/sold-a-story/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Holloway, S. M., & Stagg Peterson, S. (2022, May 31). Why Ontario’s ‘Right to Read Inquiry’ needs to broaden its recommendations. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/why-ontarios-right-to-read-inquiry-needs-to-broaden-its-recommendations-182378Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hurry, J. & Fridkin, L. (2018, December). The impact of Reading Recovery ten years after intervention. UCL Institute of Education. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/reading-recovery-europe/sites/reading-recovery-europe/files/the_impact_of_reading_recovery_ten_years_after_intervention_hurry_and_fridkin.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hurry, J., Fridkin, L., & Holliman, A. J. (2022). Reading intervention at age 6: Long-term effects of Reading Recovery in the UK on qualifications and support at age 16. British Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3752Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Literacy Association. (2016a). Dyslexia: A response to the International Dyslexia Association [Research advisory]. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/ila-dyslexia-research-advisory.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Literacy Association. (2016b). Dyslexia: A response to the International Dyslexia Association [Research advisory addendum]. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/ila-dyslexia-research-advisory-addendum.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Literacy Association. (2019a). Children’s rights to excellent literacy instruction [Position statement]. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/ila-childrens-rights-to-excellent-literacy-instruction.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Literacy Association. (2019b). Children experiencing reading difficulties: What we know and what we can do. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/ila-children-experiencing-reading-difficulties.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Iverson, S., & Tunmer, W. E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery program. Journal of Educational Pyschology, 85(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.112Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jesson, R., & Limbrick, L. (2014). Can gains from early literacy intervention be sustained? A case of Reading Recovery. Journal of Research in Reading 37(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12017Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kaye, E. L., Lozada, V., & Briggs, C. (2022). Early identification of and intervention for children with and without dyslexia characteristics: A comparison study. Literacy, Research and Instruction, 61(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2059418Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lindsey, J. B. (2022). Reading above the fray: Reliable, research-based routines for developing decoding skills. Scholastic.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Macintosh, M. (2023, February 23). Gaps in province’s literacy education probed. The Winnipeg Free Press. https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2023/02/23/gaps-in-provinces-literacy-education-probedGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- MacPhee, D., Handsfield, L. J., & Paugh, P. (2022). Conflict or conversation? Media portrayals of the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S145–S155. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.389Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mathews, J. (2020, January 31). Read all about it: The ‘reading wars’ are back in America’s education salons. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/read-all-about-it-the-reading-wars-are-back-in-americas-education-salons/2020/01/30/271793e6-4124-11ea-b5fc-eefa848cde99_story.htmlGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- May, H., Sirinides, P. M., Gray, A., & Goldsworthy, H. (2016, March). Reading Recovery: An evaluation of the four-year i3 scale-up. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. https://www.cpre.org/reading-recovery-evaluation-four-year-i3-scaleGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- McGraw Hill. (2022). Open court reading foundational skills and word analysis kits. https://www.mheducation.com/prek-12/program/open-court-reading-foundational-skills-word-analysis-kits/MKTSP-THT03M0.htmlGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Moats, L. C. (2007). Whole language high jinks: How to tell when “scientifically-based reading instruction” isn’t. Thomas B. Fordham Institute. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED498005Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Moats, L. C. (2020, Summer). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. AFT. https://www.aft.org/ae/summer2020/moatsGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/smallbookGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ontario Human Rights Commission. (2022). Right to read: Public inquiry into human rights issues affecting students with reading disabilities. Government of Ontario. https://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/right-to-read-inquiry-reportGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Paige, D. D., Young, C., Rasinski, T. V., Rupley, W. H., Nichols, W. D., & Valerio, M. (2022). Teaching reading is more than a science: It’s also an art. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S339–S350. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.388Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pearson, P. D. (2004). The reading wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 216–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803260041Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pearson, P. D. (2022, October 28). Marie Clay: A personal reflection on an unparalleled professional career. Reading Recovery. https://readingrecovery.org/marie-clay-a-personal-reflection-on-an-unparalleled-professional-career/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pinnell, G. S. (1989). Reading Recovery: Helping at-risk children learn to read. The Elementary School Journal, 90(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1086/461610Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., DeFord, D. E., Bryk, A. S., & Seltzer, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(1), 8–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/747736Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pinnell, G. S., Smith-Burke, M. T., & Worden, E. (2002). Design of Reading Recovery. The Journal of Reading Recovery, 2(1), 17–25.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pressley, M., Roehrig, A. D., & Sloup, M. (2001). Reading strategy instruction in regular primary-level classrooms by teachers trained in Reading Recovery. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 17(4), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/105735601317095061Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Quay, L. C., Steele, D. C., Johnson, C. I., & Hortman, W. (2001). Children’s achievement and personal and social development in a first-year Reading Recovery program with teachers in training. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 7–25. https://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/research-evaluation/effectiveness/childrens-achievement/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Reading Recovery Council of North America. (2022). Celebrating literacy success!: Success stories of Reading Recovery. https://readingrecovery.org/success/#success-storiesGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Rumelhart, D. E. (2004). Towards an interactive model of reading. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1149–1179). Routledge.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Scanlon, D. M., & Anderson, K. L. (2021). Using context as an assist in word solving: The contributions of 25 years of research on the interactive strategies approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S19–S34. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.335Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Schwartz, R. M. (2005). Literacy learning of at-risk first-grade students in the Reading Recovery early intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.257Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Shanahan, T. (2003). Research-based reading instruction: Myths about the National Reading Panel report. The Reading Teacher, 56(7), 646–655. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20205261Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 958–996. https://doi.org/10.2307/748206Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Statistics Canada & Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2005). Learning a living: First results of the Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey (Cat. No. 89-603-XWE). http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-603-x/2005001/4071714-eng.htmGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Stouffer, J. (2016). A palette of excellence: Contextualizing the reported benefits of Reading Recovery training to Canadian primary classroom teachers. Journal of Reading Recovery, Spring. 31–48.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Stouffer, J. (2021). Seeking middle ground: Analyzing running records from the top and bottom. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2012Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sun, Y., & Matczuk, L. A. (2020, January). Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery national implementation data 2018–2019. Canadian Institute of Reading Recovery. https://rrcanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/CIRR-National-Implementation-Report_2018-19_Final.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- The Reading League. (2022). Science of reading: Defining guide. https://www.thereadingleague.org/what-is-the-science-of-reading/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Thomas B. Fordham Foundation (2000). Whole language lives on: The illusion of balanced reading instruction. LDOnline. http://www.ldonline.org/article/6394/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Valencia, S. W., & Hebard, H. (2013). Classroom literacy assessment: Strategies for informing instruction and monitoring student progress. In B. M. Taylor & N. K. Duke (Eds.), Handbook of effective literacy instruction: Research-based practice K–8. (pp. 106–136). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Van Dyke, J. R. (2019). After Reading Recovery: Collective case studies of the writing development of former Reading Recovery students in Grade Two. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto]. Tspace. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/97026Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- What Works Clearinghouse. (2013, July). WWC Intervention Report: Reading Recovery. United States Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_readrecovery_071613.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- What Works Clearinghouse. (2022, June). WWC Find what works based on the evidence: Literacy. United States Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/FWW/Results?filters=,LiteracyGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Worthy, J., Svrek, N., Daly-Lesch, A., & Tily, S. (2018). “We know for a fact:” Dyslexia interventionists and the power of authoritative discourse. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(3) 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12468431Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wyse, D., & Bradbury, A. (2022). Reading wars or reading reconciliation? A critical examination of robust research evidence, curriculum policy and teachers’ practices for teaching phonics and reading. Review of Education, 10(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3314Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Yatvin, J. (2002). Babes in the woods: The wanderings of the National Reading Panel. The Phi Delta Kappan, 83(5), 364–369. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20440142Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar