Abstracts
Résumé
Initialement, la recherche sur l’évaluation formative des apprentissages relevait d’initiatives isolées, sans qu’il n’y ait de significations partagées dans la communauté scientifique, rendant difficile l’élaboration d’un portrait de cette recherche. Quarante ans plus tard, et sous l’impulsion des études qui se sont multipliées avec la vague de réformes éducatives dans les sociétés occidentales depuis une dizaine d’années, il devient possible de se donner une représentation du domaine aujourd’hui constitué. Il se démarque maintenant diverses tendances en recherche, regroupées autour de différents objets spécifiques rattachés à l’évaluation formative. Cette contribution vise à tracer un panorama de cette recherche en prenant en compte ce qui se fait tant dans le monde francophone qu’anglophone. Comme on le verra, aux côtés des démarches instrumentales bien connues, émergent maintenant des démarches plus informelles relevant de stratégies mises en place par l’enseignant dans le flux des interactions en classe.
Mots-clés :
- Évaluation formative des apprentissages,
- conceptions de l’évaluation formative,
- tendances en recherche,
- stratégies des enseignants
Abstract
Initially, research on formative assessment of learning resulted from isolated initiatives, without having shared meaning in the scientific community, rendering its portrait difficult. Forty years later, and with the multiplication of studies resulting from the wave of educational reforms in western societies in the past decade, it now becomes possible to gain a clear scope of the constituted field. It now distinguishes itself by various tendencies of research, gathered around different objects specifically attached to formative assessment. This contribution aims to give an overview of this research by considering what is done both in the Francophone and the Anglophone communities. As we will see, parallel to well known instrumental reasoning, now emerges informal methods stemming from strategies put into place by teachers in the flow of interactions taking place in the classroom.
Keywords:
- Formative assessment of learning,
- conceptions of formative assessment,
- research trends,
- teacher’s strategies
Resumo
Inicialmente, a investigação sobre a avaliação formativa das aprendizagens resultava de iniciativas isoladas, sem que houvesse significações partilhadas pela comunidade científica, tornando difícil a elaboração de um retrato desta mesma investigação. Quarenta anos mais tarde, e sob o impulso dos estudos que se multiplicaram com a vaga de reformas educativas das sociedades ocidentais na última década, tornou-se possível construir uma representação do domínio hoje em dia constituído. Com efeito, é possível distinguir actualmente diversas tendências na investigação, agrupadas em torno de diferentes objectos específicos ligados à avaliação formativa. esta contribuição pretende traçar um panorama desta investigação, tendo em conta o que se faz tanto no mundo francófono como no mundo anglófono. Como se verá, ao lado de procedimentos instrumentais bem conhecidos, emergem agora procedimentos mais informais resultantes de estratégias desenvolvidas pelo professor no fluxo de interacções com a turma.
Palavras chaves:
- Avaliação formativa das aprendizagens,
- concepções de avaliação formativa,
- tendências da investigação,
- estratégias dos professores
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Références
- Allai, L. (1979). Stratégies d’évaluation formative: conceptions psycho-pédagogiques et modalités d’application. In L. Allai, J. Cardinet & Ph. Perrenoud (dir.), L’évaluation formative dans un enseignement différencié (6e éd., 1991, pp. 153-183). Berne, CH: Peter Lang.
- Allal, L., & Mottier Lopez, L. (2005). Formative evaluation of learning: A review of publications in French. In Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms (pp. 265-290). Paris: OECD Publication.
- Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
- Andrade, H. L. (2009a). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (dir.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90-105). New York and London: Routledge.
- Andrade, H. L. (2009b). Summing up and moving forward. Key challenges and future directions for research and development in formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (dir.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 344-351). New York and London: Routledge.
- Andrade, H. L., & Cizek, G. J. (2009). Handbook of formative assessment. New York and London: Routledge.
- Ash, D., & Levitt, K. (2003). Working within the zone of proximal development: Formative assessment as professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(1), 23-48.
- Atanases, S. Z., & Achinstein, B. (2003). Focusing new teachers on individual and low performing students: The centrality of formative assessment in the mentor’s repertoire of practice. Teachers College Record, 105(8), 1486-1520.
- Bachmann, K., & Grossen, M. (2007). Contextes et dynamiques des interactions entre apprenants dans une situation de mentorat. In L. Allal & L. Mottier Lopez (dir.), Régulation des apprentissages en situation scolaire et en formation (pp. 129-147). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
- Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulick, J. A., & Kulick, C.-L. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 89-99.
- Barnes, R. (1996). Implementing pupil self-assessment in teaching and learning. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom.
- Bélair, L. (2002). L’apport du portfolio dans l’évaluation des compétences. Évaluation et formation, Questions vives, 1(1), 17-38.
- Bell, B. (2000). Formative assessment and science education: A model and theorizing. In R. Millar, J. Leach & J. Osborne (dir.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 48-61). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
- Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2002). Working inside the black box. London: King’s College.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J. Gardner (dir.), Assessment and learning (pp. 9-25). London: Sage.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
- Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1-12.
- Bloom, B. S., Hasting J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
- Brookhart, S. M., Moss, C. M., & Long, B. A. (2010). Teacher inquiry into formative assessment practices in remedial reading classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 41-58.
- Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. A ssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 347-363.
- Butler, R. (1987) Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474-482.
- Butler, R., & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 210216.
- Campanale, F. (1997). Auto-évaluation et transformation de pratiques pédagogiques. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 20, 1-24.
- Campos, J., & O’Hern, J. (2007). How does using formative assessment empower students in their learning? Mémoire de maîtrise en enseignement et leadership non publié, Saint Xavier University, Chicago.
- Cardinet, J. (1988). La maîtrise, communication réussie. In M. Huberman (dir.), Assurer la réussite des apprentissages scolaires? Les propositions de la pédagogie de la maîtrise (pp. 155-195). Neuchâtel, CH: Delachaux & Niestlé.
- Carroll, M. (1995). Formative assessment workshops: Feedback sessions for large classes. Biochemical Education, 23(2), 65-67.
- Charlin, B., Gagnon, R., Kazi-Tani, D., & Thivierge, R. (2005). Le test de concordance comme outil d’évaluation en ligne du raisonnement des professionnels en situation d’incertitude. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaires, 2(2), 22-66.
- Cizek, G. J. (2009). An introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (dir.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 3-17). New York and London: Routledge.
- Côté, É. (1998). Pratiques d’évaluation des apprentissages et engagement de l’élève par rapport à la matière qui lui est enseignée. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Québec, Université Laval.
- Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 137-151.
- Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practice on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481.
- Dann, R. (1991). Pupil assessment in the primary school: With special reference to the assessment implications of the education reform act 1988. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
- Dunphy, E. (2010). Assessing early learning through formative assessment: key issues and considerations. Irish Educational Studies, 29(1), 41-56.
- Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behaviour a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 162-173.
- Elliott, S. N. (1999). Teacher formative assessment: Influences and practice case study research at the year one level. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, University of London, London.
- Elliott, S. N., Kettler, R. J., Beddow, P. A., & Kurz, A., (2009). Research and strategies for adapting formative assessment for students with special needs. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (éds), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 159-180). New York and London: Routledge.
- Etkina, E., Karelina, A., Murthy, S., & Ruibal-Villasenor, M. (2009). Using action research to improve learning and formative assessment to conduct research. Physical Review. Special Topics, Physics Education Research, 5(1), 1-15.
- Fourez, G. (2003). Apprivoiser l’épistémologie. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
- Fourez, G., Englebert-Lecomte, V., & Mathy, P. (1997). Nos savoirs sur nos savoirs. Un lexique d’épistémologiepour l’enseignement. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
- Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(6), 1-8.
- Gattullo, F. (2000). Formative assessment in ELT primary (elementary) classrooms: An italian case study. Language Testing, 17(2), 278-288.
- Gioka, O. C. E. (2004). Formative assessment in teaching graphic skills in investigation lessons: A study of teachers’ goals, strategies, assessment criteria and feedback. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, London University of South Bank, London.
- Gipps, C., McCallum, E., & Hargreaves, B. (2000). What makes a good primary school teacher? Expert classroom strategies. London: Routledge Falmer.
- Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items (3e éd.). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Harlen, W. (2006). The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning. In J. Gardner (dir.), Assessment and learning (pp. 61-80). London: Sage.
- Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). The complexity of teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 365-381.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
- Hayward, L., Priestley, M., & Young, M. (2004). Ruffling the calm of the ocean floor: merging practice, policy and research in assessment in Scotland. Oxford Review of Education, 30(3), 397-415.
- Higgins, K. M., Harris, N. A., & Kuehn, L. L. (1994). Placing assessment into the hands of young children: A study of student-generated criteria and self-assessment. Educational Assessment, 2, 309-324.
- Hobbs, N. (dir.). (1975). Issues in the classification of children (vol. 1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Hugues, G. B. (2009). Formative assessment practices that maximize learning for students at risk. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (dir.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 212-232). New York and London: Routledge.
- Kasadi, C. (2005). Exploration des pratiques de professeurs des mathématiques du secondaire à l’égard de l’évaluation formative en mathématiques. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières en association avec l’Université du Québec à Montréal, Trois-Rivières.
- Klenowski, V. (1995). An investigation of student self-evaluation as an authentic pedagogical practice: Processes, possibilities and realities. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, London Institute of Education, London.
- Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
- Kreiter, C. D., Haugen, T., Leaven, T., Goerdt, C., Rosenthal, N., McGaghie, W. C., & Dee, F. (2011). A report on the piloting of a novel computer-based medical case simulation for teaching and formative assessment of diagnostic laboratory testing. Medical Education online, 16. À partir de [http://journals.sfu.ca/coaction/index.php/ meo/article/viewArticle/5646/html_79].
- Lamri, D., Mahieddine, D., & Chabane, K. (2005). Intégration d’un outil d’évaluation de l’apprenant dans un système auteur. Papier présenté dans le cadre de la 3e Conférence internationale des sciences de l’électronique et des technologies de l’information et des télécommunications, du 27 au 31 mars, Tunisie. En ligne: [http://www.setit.rnu.tn/last_edition/setit2005/applications/392.pdf].
- Larochelle, M., & Désautels, J. (2001-2002). Points de vue de conseillers et conseillères d’orientation et de scientifiques sur les sciences. In A. Durey, J. Lebeaume & P. Vérillon (dir.), Séminaire de didactique des disciplines technologiques - Cachan 1998-1999 (pp. 73-106). France: Laboratoire interuniversitaire de recherche en éducation scientifique et technologique, École normale supérieure de Cachan, INRP et IUFM Créteil.
- Laveault, D. (2009). L’évaluation en classe: des politiques aux pratiques. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 32(3), 1-22.
- Laveault, D. (2007). De la « régulation » au « réglage »: élaboration d’un modèle d’autoévaluation des apprentissages. In L. Allal & L. Mottier Lopez (dir.), Régulation des apprentissages en situation scolaire et en formation (pp. 207-234). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
- Laveault, D. (2004). Interactions entre formation et évaluation: de la régulation entre acteurs et leurs rôles à la régulation de l’apprentissage. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 27(1), 51-67.
- Legendre, M.-F. (2001). Approches constructivistes et nouvelles orientations curriculaires. D’un curriculum fondé sur l’approche par objectifs à un curriculum axé sur le développement de compétences. In P. Jonnaert & D. Masciotra (dir.), Constructivisme et choix contemporains. Hommage à Ernst von Glasersfeld (pp. 51-91). Montréal: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Leung, C., & Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21(3), 335-359.
- Martens, R., & Hermans, H. (2000). Internet based formative prior knowledge assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26(3), 245-258.
- McMillan, J. H. (2010). The practical implications of educational aims and contexts for formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (dir.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 41-58). New York and London: Routledge.
- Miller, T. (2009). Formative computer-based assessment in higher education: the effectiveness of feedback in supporting student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 181-192.
- Morrissette, J. (2011). Ouvrir la boîte noire de l’entretien de groupe. Recherches qualitatives, 29(2), 7-32. À partir de [http://recherche-qualitative.qc.ca/numero29%283%29/RQ29%283%29_Morrissette.pdf].
- Morrissette, J. (2010a). Manières de faire l’évaluation formative des apprentissages: analyse interactionniste du savoir-faire d’enseignantes du primaire. Sarrebruck, D: Les Éditions universitaires européennes.
- Morrissette, J. (2010b). Une perspective interactionniste: un autre point de vue sur l’évaluation des apprentissages. SociologieS. À partir de [http://sociologies.revues.org/index3028.html].
- Morrissette, J. (2009a). Manières de faire l’évaluation formative des apprentissages selon un groupe d’enseignantes du primaire: une perspective interactionniste. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université Laval, Québec (QC).
- Morrissette, J. (2009b). La portée d’une perspective socioculturelle de l’évaluation formative: vers l’élargissement d’une conceptualisation. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 32(2), 1-23.
- Morrissette, J. (2002). Évolution de la conception de l’évaluation formative des apprentissages à travers le discours ministériel depuis 1981. Mémoire de maîtrise en éducation non publié, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Québec (QC).
- Mottier Lopez, L. (2007). Régulations interactives situées dans des dynamiques de microculture de classe. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 30(2), 23-47.
- Mottier Lopez, L. (2005). Co-constitution de la micmculture de classe dans une perspective située: étude d’activités de résolution de problèmes mathématiques en troisième année primaire. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Genève, Université de Genève.
- Niamh, K., & Glaspole, S. E. (2006). Formative assessment as a learning aid for pharmacy calculations - A theory based design. Pharmacy Education, 6(1), 27-31.
- Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral dammage. How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
- Nizet, I. (1999). L’explicitation de modèles mentaux dans un contexte d’évaluation formative d’habiletés de résolution de problèmes. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université Laval, Québec.
- Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (2005). L’évaluation formative: pour un meilleur apprentissage dans les classes secondaires. Paris: Centre pour la recherche et l’innovation dans l’enseignement.
- Ouellette, L.-M. (1990). La communication comme support théorique à l’évaluation. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 13, 5-22.
- Pépin, Y. (1994). Savoirs pratiques et savoirs scolaires: une représentation constructiviste de l’éducation. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 20(1), 63-85.
- Perrenoud, Ph. (1997). De l’évaluation formative à la régulation maîtrisée des processus d’apprentissage. Vers un élargissement du champ conceptuel. Consulté le 27 avril 2008 à partir de [http://www.unige.ch/fapse/SSE/teachers/perrenoud/php_main/php_1997/1997_11.html].
- Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Carugati, F. (2004). Des psychologues sociaux étudient l’apprentissage. In G. Chatelanat, C. Moro & M. Saada-Robert (dir.), Unité et pluralité des sciences de l’éducation: sondages au coeur de la recherche (pp. 159-183). Berne, CH: Peter Lang.
- Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2003). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Calper Working Papers, 1, 1-26.
- Powell, S. D., & Makin, M. (1994). Enabling pupils with learning difficulties to reflect on their own thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 20(5), 579-594.
- Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1-20.
- Pryor, J., & Torrance, H. (1998). Formative assessment in the classroom: Where psychological theory meets social practice. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 151176.
- Rahman, S. A. (2001). Promoting learning outcomes in paediatrics through formative assessment. Medical Teacher, 23(5), 467-470.
- Rolfsen, M., & Torvatn, H. (2005). How to get through: Communication challenges in formative evaluation. Evaluation, 11(3), 297-309.
- Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-84.
- Sadler, D. R., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-assessment and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31.
- Sawyer, J., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340-352.
- Scallon G. (2004). L’évaluation des apprentissages dans une approche par compétences (2e éd., 2007). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
- Scallon, G. (2000). L’évaluation formative. Québec: Renouveau pédagogique.
- Schneider, M. C., & Randel, B. (2009). Research on characteristics of effective professional development programs for enhancing educators skills in formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (dir.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 251-276). New York and London: Routledge.
- Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189. '
- Sireci, S. G., & Pitoniak, M. J. (2007). Assessment accommodations: What have we learned from research? In C. C. Laitusis & L. L. Cook (dir.), Large scale assessment and accommodations: What work? (pp. 53-65). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
- Smith, J. J. (2004). A nalysis of pupil-pupil talk during game playing: A tool in the formative assessment of bilingual pupils. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
- Solomon, J. (1991). Group discussions in the classroom. School Science Review, 72(261), 29-34.
- St-Pierre, L. (2004). L’habilité d’autoévaluation; pourquoi et comment la développer? Pédagogie collégiale, 8(1), 33-38.
- Stiggins, R. (2009). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (dir.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 233-250). New York and London: Routledge.
- Stiggins, R. J., Griswold, M. M., & Wikelund, K. R. (1989). Measuring thinking skills through classroom assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 233-246.
- Thibault, P. (1993). Étude de l’efficacité des approches interactive et rétroactive de l’évaluation formative dans le contexte d’un apprentissage effectué individuellement et de façon autonome par le biais d’un matériel didactique écrit. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université Laval, Québec.
- Topping, K. (2009). Peer as a source of formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (éds), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 61-74). New York and London: Routledge.
- Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615-631.
- Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389-405.
- Vial, M. (1995). Nature et fonction de l’auto-évaluation dans le dispositif de formation. Revue française de pédagogie, 112, 69-76.
- Wang, T. H. (2007). What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e-learning environment? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 171-186.
- Watkins, C. (2010). Learning, performance and improvement. INSIResearch Matters, 34. Consulté le 10 octobre 2010 à partir de [http://www.ioe.ac.uk/about/documents/Watkins_10_Lng_Perf_Imp_ev.pdf].
- Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment: Authenticity, context, and validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 200-214.
- Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703-713.
- Williams, R. L., Mosby, D., & Hinson, V. (1978). Critical issues in achievement testing of children from diverse ethnic backgrounds. In M. Wargo & D. R. Green (dir.), Achievement testing of disavantaged and minority students for educational program evaluation (pp. 41-72). Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw Hill.
- Wininger, S. R. (2005). Using your tests to teach: Formative summative assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 32(3), 164-166.
- Xu, H. (2010). The effects of formative evaluation on students’ self-directed learning and language teaching. Education, Technology and Computer Science, 3, 524-526.
- Yorke, M. (2001). Formative assessment and its relevance to retention. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 115-126.
- Zellermayer, M. (1989). The study of teachers’ written feedback to students’ writing: Changes in theoretical considerations and the expansion of research contexts. Instructional Science, 18, 145-165.
10.7202/031701ar