Abstracts
Abstract
We mobilize the organizational and practice-based literature to determine the mechanisms enabling a social collective to introduce innovation in public rescue. The case highlights how this collective acquired characteristics of a partial organization by: (1) emergent characteristics reacting to critical incidents, (2) an overarching agenda supporting actors participation, (3) complementarity of exclusion and inclusion membership practices to enforce collective identity and reach a critical mass, (4) recognition of collective actorhood through reification practices, (5) the role of a secretariat through theorizing and developing close but discrete relationships with an external actor with critical expertise and resources.
Keywords:
- Social collective,
- social innovation,
- partial organization,
- organizationality,
- participation,
- reification
Résumé
Nous mobilisons la littérature sur l’Organisation et les Pratiques pour analyser les mécanismes permettant à un Collectif social d’introduire une innovation en santé. Le cas montre comment ce Collectif acquiert des caractéristiques d’une Organisation Partielle par : 1) la résolution d’incidents critique; 2) un programme d’action qui transcende la participation des acteurs; 3) des pratiques complémentaires d’inclusion et d’exclusion de membres pour développer l’identité collective et la masse critique; 4) des pratiques de réification pour être reconnu Acteur; 5) un secrétariat qui théorise l’innovation et développe une relation étroite avec un acteur extérieur en raison de son expertise et de ses ressources.
Mots-clés :
- Collectif social,
- innovation sociale,
- organisation partielle,
- organisationalité,
- participation,
- réification
Resumen
Mobilizamos la literatura sobre la Organización y las Prácticas para analizar los mecanismos que permiten a un Colectivo social introducir una innovación en la esfera de la salud. Este caso muestra como este colectivo puede adquirir las características de una organización parcial para: 1) La resolución de incidentes críticos, 2) un programa de acciones que transcenda la participación de actores, 3) prácticas complementarias de inclusión y de exclusión de miembros para desarrollar la identidad colectiva y la masa crítica, 4) prácticas de reificación para que sea reconocida como actor, 5) un secretariado para teorizar la innovación y desarrollar una relación estrecha con un actor exterior debido a su pericia y a sus recursos.
Palabras clave:
- Colectivo social,
- innovación social,
- organización parcial,
- organizacionalidad,
- participación,
- reificación
Appendices
Bibliography
- Agterberg, Marlous; VandenHooff, Bart.; Huysman, Marleen; Soekijad, Maura. (2010). “Keeping the wheels turning: The dynamics of managing networks of practice,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 47, N° 1, p. 85-108.
- Ahrne, Goran; Brunsson, Nils (2004). Regelexplosjonen(The rule explosion), Stockholm: EFI.
- Ahrne, Goran; Brunsson, Nils. (2011). “Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization,” Organization, Vol. 18, N° 1, p. 83-104.
- Ashkenas, Ron; Ulrich, Dave; Jick, Tood; Kerr, Steve. (2002). The boundaryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure, 3rd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 364 p.
- Amin, Ash; Cohendet, Patrick (2004). Architectures of knowledge: Firms, capabilities, and communities, Oxford University Press.
- Amin, Ash; Roberts, Joanne (2008). Community, economic creativity, and organisation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Balogun, Julia; Johnson, Gerry (2004). “Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, N° 4, p. 523-549.
- Bartel, Caroline; Dutton, Jane. (2001). “Ambiguous organizational memberships: Constructing organizational identities,” in M. A. Hogg and D. J. Terry (Eds), Social identity processes in organizational contexts, Philadelphia: Psychology Press, p. 115-130.
- Bootz, Jean-Philippe.; Lievre, Pascal (2015). “Comment concilier auto-organisation et contrôle au sein des communautés de pratique pilotées? Une scoping review,” Management International, Vol. 19, N° 3.
- Brown, John Seely; Duguid, Pascal (1991). “Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation,” Organization Science, Vol. 2, p. 40-57.
- Burns, Alvin C.; Williams, Laura A.; Maxham, James T. (2000). “Narrative text biases attending the critical incidents technique,” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 3, N° 44, p. 178-186.
- Cohendet, Patrick; Creplet, Frédéric; Dupouët, Olivier (2006). La gestion des connaissances: Firmes et communautés de savoir, Paris, Economica.
- Cohendet, Patrick; Diani, Morad (2003). “L’organisation comme une communauté de communautés croyances collectives et culture d’entreprise,” Revue d’économie politique, Vol. 113, p. 697-720.
- Cohendet, Patrick; Grandadam, David; Simon, Laurent (2008). “Réseaux, communautés et projets dans les processus créatifs,” Management International, Vol. 13, N° 1, p. 29-43.
- Dobusch, Leonhard; Schoeneborn, Dennis. (2015). “Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of anonymous,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 52, N° 8, p. 1005-1035.
- Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989). “Building theories from case study research,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, N° 4, p. 532-550.
- Gadille, Martine; Méhaut, Philippe; Courault, Bruno (2013). “Compétences et régulation des marchés du travail dans les pôles de compétitivité: le cas du pôle Pégase,” Revue d’Economie Régionale & Urbaine, Vol. 2, p. 339-361.
- Granjou, Céline; Peerbaye, Ashveen (2011). “Sciences et Collectifs,” Terrains & Travaux, N° 18, p. 5-18.
- Gulati, Ranjay; Puranam, Phanish; Tushman, Michael (2012). “Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 33, N° 6, p. 571-586.
- Håkansson, Hakan; Waluszewski, Alexandra (Eds). (2007). Knowledge and innovation in business and industry: The importance of using others, London: Routledge.
- Howaldt, Jürgen; Schwarz, Michael (2010). Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. Eds. Klaus Henning, and Frank Hees. IMA/ZLW. http://www.asprea.org/imagenes/IMO%20Trendstudie_Howaldt_englisch_Final%20ds.pdf
- King, Brayden G.; Felin, Teppo; Whetten, David A. (2010). “Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor,” Organization Science, Vol. 21, N°1, p. 290-305.
- Langley, Ann (1999). “Strategies for theorizing from process data,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, N° 4, p. 691-710.
- Lave, Jane. (1988). Cognition in practice, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Miles, Matthew B.; Huberman, A. Michael (1994). Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Mokyr, Joel (2000). “Evolutionary phenomena in technological change,” in J. Ziman (Ed), Technological innovation as an evolutionary process, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 52-65.
- Munir, Kamal A. (2005). “The social construction of events: A study of institutional change in the photographic field,” Organization Studies, Vol. 26, N° 1, p. 93-112.
- Nissen, Helle. Aaroe; Evald, Majbritt. Rostgaard; Clarke, Ann. Hojbjerg. (2014). “Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: Exemplified through public-private-innovation partnerships,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 43, N° 3, p. 473-482.
- O’Mahony, Siobhan; Lakhani, Karim. R. (2011). “Organizations in the shadow of communities,” Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 33, p. 3-36.
- Orlikowski, Wanda J. (1996). “Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, N° 1, p. 63-92.
- Paraponaris, Claude; Rohr, Anne. (2015). “Communautés créatives et langage de codification,” 1er séminaire du Knowledge Communities Observatory (KCO), Strasbourg, Novembre.
- Paraponaris, Claude; Sigal, Martine; Vion, Antoine. (2013). “Socialisation et génération des connaissances: distinguer les collectifs des communautés,” 6ème Conférence AGeCSO, Nancy, Juin.
- Perrow, Charles (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay, 3rd ed., Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
- Roos, Inger. (2002). “Methods of investigating critical incidents: A comparative review,” Journal of Service Research, February, 193-204.
- Schreyögg, Georg; Sydow, Jörg (2010). “Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms,” Organization Science, Vol. 21, N° 6, p. 1251-1262.
- Simon, Laurent (2009). “Underground, upperground et middleground: les collectifs créatifs et la capacité créative de la ville,” Management International, Vol. 13, p. 37-51.
- Suchman, Mark C. (1995). “’Managing legitimacy’: Strategic and institutional approaches,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, N° 3, p. 571-610.
- Weaver, D. H.; Graber, D. A.; McCombs, M. E., Maxwell, E., Eyal, C. H. (1981). Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images, and interest, New York: Praeger.
- Wenger, Etienne. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Yin, Robert K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, Applied Social Research Methods series, 3rd ed., London: Sage Publications.
10.7202/037503ar