Abstracts
Abstract
What does research reveal about tutoring adolescents in literacy? We conducted a meta-analysis, identifying 152 published studies, of which 12 met rigorous inclusion criteria. We analyzed the 12 studies for the effects of tutoring according to the type, focus, and amount of tutoring; the number, age, and language background of students; and the quality of the research. Despite variability, these studies suggest benefits, notably for cross-age tutoring, reading, and small tutoring programs of lengthy duration.
Résumé
Qu’est-ce que la recherche nous apprend sur le tutorat en littératie auprès des adolescents? Nous avons mené une méta-analyse, relevant 152 études publiées, parmi lesquelles 12 rencontraient des critères rigoureux d’inclusion. Nous avons donc analysé ces 12 études, examinant les effets du tutorat non seulement selon son type, ses objectifs et sa quantité mais également selon le nombre, l’âge et le profil langagier des élèves. La qualité des travaux de recherche a aussi été prise en considération. Ainsi, malgré une certaine variabilité, ses études suggèrent des bénéfices aux initiatives de tutorat, particulièrement le tutorat inter-âge, les programmes de lecture et les programmes de taille modeste, de longue durée.
Appendices
Bibliographie
- * indicates studies included in the meta-analysis
- * Allen, A., & Chavkin, N. F. (2004). New evidence that tutoring with community volunteers can help middle school students improve their academic achievement. School Community Journal, 14, 2, 7-18.
- Allor, J., & McCathren, R. (2004). The efficacy of an early literacy tutoring program implemented by college students. Learning Disability Research & Practice, 19, 116-129.
- Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Keating, T. (2000). When less may be more: A 2-year longitudinal evaluation of a volunteer tutoring program requiring minimal training. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 494-519.
- Bernstein, S., Boquiren, C., & Cho, A. (1997). Keeping cross-age tutoring alive: Growing and sustaining a school-wide tutoring program. San Francisco, CA: Partners in School Innovation.
- *Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 4, 485-522.
- Burns, M. K., Senesac, B. V., & Symington, T. (2004). The effectiveness of the HOSTS Program in improving the reading achievement of children at-risk for reading failure. Reading Research and Instruction, 43, 87-103.
- Chandler-Olcott, K. & Hinchman, K. (2005). Tutoring adolescent literacy learners: A guide for volunteers. New York: Guilford Press.
- *Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25, 471-533.
- Cohen, J. (2007). A case study of a high school English-language learner and his reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51, 164-175.
- Cumming, A. (2003). Assessing L2 writing: Alternative constructs and ethical dilemmas? Assessing Writing, 8, 73-83.
- D’Agostino, J. V., & Murphy, J. A. (2004). A meta-analysis of Reading Recovery in United States schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 23-38.
- Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605-619.
- Ehri, L. C., Dreyer, L. G., Flugman, B., & Gross, A. (2007). Reading Rescue: An effective tutoring intervention model for language-minority students who are struggling readers in first grade. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 414-448.
- Fashola, O. (2001). Building effective afterschool programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
- *Fisher, D. (2001). Cross age tutoring: Alternatives to the reading resource room for struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(4), 234-240.
- Franzak, J. K. (2006). “Zoom”: A review of the literature on marginalized adolescent readers, literacy theory, and policy implications. Review of Educational Research, 76, 2, 209-248.
- *Franzke, M., Kintsch, E., Caccamise, D., Johnson, N., & Dooley, S. (2005). Summary street: Computer support for comprehension and writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 1, 53-80.
- Friedland, E. S., & Truscott, D. M. (2005). Building awareness and commitment of middle school students through literacy tutoring. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48, 550-562.
- Gaffney, J. S., Methven, J. M., & Bagdasarian, S. (2002). Assisting older students to read expository text in a tutorial setting: A case for a high-impact intervention. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 18, 119-150.
- Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445-476.
- Harmon, J. M., Keehn, S., & Kenney, M. S. (2004). Tutoring struggling adolescent readers: A program investigation. Reading Research and Instruction, 44, 46-74.
- Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
- *Houge, T. T., Peyton, D., Geier, C., & Petrie, B. (2007). Adolescent literacy tutoring: Face-to-face and via webcam technology. Reading Psychology, 28, 3, 283-300.
- Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 4, 575-611.
- *Jacobson, J., Thrope, L., Fisher, D., Lapp, D., Frey, N., & Flood, J. (2001). Cross-age tutoring: A literacy improvement approach for struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44, 528-536.
- Juel, C. (1996). What makes literacy tutoring effective? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 268-289.
- Kohls, R., & Wilson, J. S. (in press). A thematic synthesis of research on literacy tutoring. To appear in A. Cumming (Ed.), Understanding adolescent literacy in a culturally diverse context. New York: Routledge.
- Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-school-time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educational Research, 76, 275-313.
- Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- *McKinstery, J., & Topping, K. J. (2003). Cross-age peer tutoring of thinking skills in the high school. Educational Psychology in Practice, 19, 199-217.
- Moje, E., & O’Brien, D. (Eds.). (2001). Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Clearinghouse.
- *Penney, C. G. (2002). Teaching decoding skills to poor readers in high school. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 1, 99-118.
- Richards, J. C., & Lassonde, C. A. (Eds.). (2009). Literacy tutoring that works: A look at successful in-school, after-school, and summer programs. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Ritter, G., Barnett, J. Denny, G. & Albin, G. (2009). The effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programs for elementary and middle school students: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 3-38.
- Rowen, N. & Gosine, K. (2006). Support that matters: A community-based response to the challenge of raising the academic achievement of economically vulnerable youth. In D. Armstrong & B. McMahon (Eds.), Inclusion in urban educational environments: Addressing issues of diversity, equity, and social justice (pp. 277-299). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
- *Rowley, K., Carlson, P., & Miller, T. (1998). A cognitive technology to teach composition skills: Four studies with the R-WISE writing tutor. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18, 259-296.
- *Rowley, K., & Meyer, N. (2003). The effect of a computer tutor for writers on student writing achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 169-187.
- Rush, L., Eakle, J., & Berger, A. (Eds.). (2007). Secondary school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practice. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
- Schultz, K., & Fecho, B. (2005). Literacies in adolescence: An analysis of policies from the United States and Queensland, Australia. In N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood & D. Livingstone (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy, Vol. 2 (pp. 677-694). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
- Shanahan, T. (1998). On the effectiveness and limitations of tutoring in reading. In P. D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 217-234). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Topping, K., & Hill, S. (1995). University and college students as tutors for schoolchildren: A typology and review of evaluation research. In S. Goodlad (Ed.), Students as tutors and mentors (pp. 13-31). London, PA: Kogan Page.
- *Vogelwiesche, U., Grob, A., & Winkler, B. (2006). Improving computer skills of socially disadvantaged adolescents: Same-age versus cross-age tutoring. Learning and Instruction, 16, 241-255.
- Wasik, B. A. (1998). Using volunteers are reading tutors: Guidelines for successful practices. The Reading Teacher, 51, 562-570.
- Wasik, B. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 178-200.