Abstracts
Abstract
The focus of this article is teacher professional development. The article examines literature related to teacher professional development and methods of measuring its impact. In order to ground the discussion, the article focuses on a case study that captures the perspectives of Ontario secondary school teachers and their administrators as they implement a literacy program targeted at improving student achievement.
Résumé
Les stratégies relatives à la réussite des élèves sont souvent assujetties à la compréhension des liens entre le perfectionnement professionnel des enseignants et le développement de la littératie des élèves. En plus d’examiner la littérature portant sur le perfectionnement professionnel et les mesures relatives à son impact, cet article présente une étude de cas qui relate les représentations des enseignants des écoles secondaires de l’Ontario et des administrateurs scolaires durant le processus de mise en oeuvre d’un programme de littératie visant l’amélioration du rendement des élèves.
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Biographical notes
Marjorie J. Hinds is an experienced educator who has worked as a high school teacher, consultant, vice-principal and principal in Newfoundland andLabrador and Ontario, Canada.She has extensive experience as a conference presenter in the areas of action research and teacher professional development. Her research interests include evaluation of teacher professional development, school leadership, school change, and qualitative research methodology.
Marie Josée Berger is both a professor and the dean at theFaculty of Education of the University of Ottawa. In addition to the extensive research she has conducted and to the expert knowledge she has gained in the field of reading, her most recent research focuses on literacy implementation of professional development as well as teaching and evaluation practices in relation to diversity.
Bibliography
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
- Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Beers, K. (1996). No time, no interest, no way, the three voices of literacy. Journal of School Librarian, 2 (2) 30-33.
- Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33 (8), 3-15.
- Burchell, H., Dyson, J., & Rees, M. (2002). Making a difference: A study of the impact of continuing professional development on professional practice. Journal of In-Service Education, 28 (2), 219-229.
- Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Teacher education and the outcomes trap. Journal of Teacher Education, 56 (5), 411-417.
- Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, practice, and politics in teacher education: Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Educational Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
- Cohen, D., & Hill, H. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Bradsford, J. E. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Elmore, R. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperatives for professional development in education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute. http://www.shankerinstitute.org
- Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Educational Research Journal, 70 (1), 113-136.
- Fessler, R. (1995). Dynamics of teacher career stages. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.). Professional Development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 171-192). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Fullan, N. & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nded.). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Goddard, R. (2004). Collective efficacy: Theoretical development, empirical evidence and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33 (3), 3-13.
- Guskey, T. (2005). A Conversation with Thomas Guskey. The Evaluation Exchange, X1 (4) http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/eval/issue32/qanda.html
- Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13 (10).
- Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002). Micropolitical Literacy: reconstructing a neglected dimension in teacher development. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 755-767.
- Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
- Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl, (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadershi (pp. 22-47). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (2004). Leadership practices for accountable schools. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger, (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration. Dordecht: Kluwer Press.
- Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York: The Wallace Foundation
- Leithwood, K., Steinbach, R., & Jantzi, D. (2002). School leadership and teachers’ motivation to implement accountability policies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38 (1), 94-119.
- Levin, B. (2003). Helping research in education to matter more (unpublished paper). Winnipeg, MB: University of Manitoba. www.sshrc.ca/web/about/publications/ben_levin.pdf
- Lick, D. (2005). A new perspective on organizational learning: Creating learning teams. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29 (1), 88-96.
- Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105 (6), 913-945.
- Majhanovich, S. (2002). Conflicting visions, competing expectations: control and deskilling of education- a perspective from Ontario. McGill Journal of Education, 37 (2), 159-176.
- National Academy of Education of the United States of America Report. www.naeducation.org/Teacher_Quality_White_Paper.pdf
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2004a). Teacher excellence-unlocking student potential through continuing professional development. August 16, v. 2. www.edu.gov.on.ca
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2004b). Me read, no way: A practical guide to improving boys’ literacy skills. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
- Randi, J., & Zeichner, K. (2004). New visions of teacher professional development. In M. Smylie & D. Miretzky (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce. 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part 1, Chapter 6, pp. 108-227). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Ross, J., & Bruce, C. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23 (2), 146-159.
- Soulsby, D., & Swain, D. (2003). A report on the award-bearing INSET Scheme. London: DfED.
- Spillane, J., & Timperley, H. (2004). Practice is the heart of the matter: Distributed leadership and networked learning communities. http://www.ncsl.org.uk/networked/networked-research.cfm
- Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (10), 758-765.
- Stiggins, R., & Chappius, J. (2006). What a difference a word makes: Assessment FOR learning rather than assessment OF learning helps students succeed. Journal of Staff Development, 27 (1), 10-14.
Appendices
Notes biographiques
Marjorie J. Hinds est une enseignante de carrière au secondaire qui a aussi occupé des postes de directrice et directrice adjointe à Terre-Neuve etLabrador et en Ontario, Canada. Elle a présenté à différentes conférences des communications sur des thèmes reliés à la recherche-action et le perfectionnement professionnel des enseignants. Ses intérêts de recherche portent sur l’évaluation du perfectionnement professionnel des enseignants, le leadership académique, le changement dans les écoles, la recherche qualitative.
Marie Josée Berger est doyenne et professeure à la Faculté d’éducation de l’Université d’Ottawa.Son champ de recherche porte particulièrement sur la lecture. Elle se penche dans ses présentes recherches sur la mise en oeuvre de la littératie par le perfectionnement professionnel ainsi que la prise en compte de la diversité dans les pratiques d’enseignement et d’évaluation.