Abstracts
Abstract
The present plays an important part in history education, in particular in efforts to make the study of the past relevant for today. This contribution examines how the relationship between past and present is dealt with in current Flemish secondary history education by analyzing 190 written history exams for the 11th and 12th grade. Ten percent of the questions address the present in an autonomous way and 8% relate past and present to each other. A more fine-grained analysis of the present-related questions reveals a variety of ways to integrate the present in history education, including the study of recent interpretations of the past.
Résumé
Le présent joue un rôle important dans l’enseignement de l’histoire, dont celui de rendre pertinente l’étude du passé dans le contexte contemporain. Cette contribution explore de quelle manière l’enseignement de l’histoire, tel que prodigué au sein des écoles secondaires flamandes, traite les relations entre le passé et le présent. Pour ce faire, les auteurs ont analysé 190 examens écrits en histoire, complétés par des élèves de 11e et 12e année. 10 % des questions abordent le présent de façon autonome, alors que 8 % font un lien entre le passé et le présent. Une analyse plus poussée des questions traitant du présent dévoile une variété de pistes pour intégrer le présent dans l’enseignement de l’histoire, incluant l’étude des interprétations récentes du passé.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Albicher, A. (2005). Verleden in de ban van het heden. Over de valkuilen van het Vlaams geschiedenisonderwijs. [The past under the spell of the present. About the pitfalls of Flemish history education]. Kleio, 46(6), 8-11.
- Birenbaum, L., & Dochy, F. (Eds.). (1996). Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
- Drake, F., & Nelson, L. (2005). Engagement in teaching history: Theory and practice for middle and secondary teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
- Flemish Ministry of Education and Training. (2000a). Secundair onderwijs, derde graad ASO: uitgangspunten bij de vakgebonden eindtermen geschiedenis. [Secondary education, third stage general education: Basic principles of the subject-specific history standards]. Retrieved from http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/curriculum/secundair-onderwijs/derde-graad/aso/vakgebonden/geschiedenis/algemeen.htm
- Flemish Ministry of Education and Training. (2000b). Secundair onderwijs, derde graad ASO: vakgebonden eindtermen geschiedenis. [Secondary education, third stage general education: Subject-specific history standards]. Retrieved from http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/curriculum/secundair-onderwijs/derde-graad/aso/vakgebonden/geschiedenis/algemeen.htm
- King, P. T. (2000). Thinking past a problem: Essays on the history of ideas. London, United Kingdom: Frank Cass.
- Lee, P. J. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom (pp. 31-79). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Lee, P. (2006). Understanding history. In P. Seixas (Ed.), Theorizing historical consciousness (pp. 129-164). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
- Lévesque, S. (2009). Thinking historically. Educating students for the twenty-first century. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
- Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2008). Researching history education. Theory, method, and context. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
- Lobbes, T. (2012). Verleden zonder stof. De gedaanten van het heden in het Belgische geschiedenisonderwijs, 1945-1989. [Past without content. The forms of the present in Belgian history education]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Leuven, Belgium.
- Lobbes, T. (2013). Het Belgische geschiedenisonderwijs en de uitdaging van de eigentijdse geschiedenis (1945-1961). [Belgian history education and the challenge of contemporary history (1945-1961)]. Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis, 126(1), 76-91.
- Munslow, A. (1997). Deconstructing history. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
- Rosa, H. (2005). The speed of global flows and the pace of democratic politics. New Political Science, 27(4), 445-459.
- Schampaert, A., Wils, K., Clarebout, G., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). De relatie tussen heden en verleden in de geschiedenisles. Een empirisch onderzoek naar de opvattingen van toekomstige leraren geschiedenis in Vlaanderen. [The connection between present and past in the history classroom. An empirical research into the beliefs of prospective history teachers in Flanders]. Hermes: Tijdschrift van de Vlaamse Leraren Geschiedenis, 15(49), 1-8.
- Seixas, P. (1998). Student teachers thinking historically. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26, 310-341.
- Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six historical thinking concepts. Toronto, ON: Nelson Education.
- Shemilt, D. (1980). History 13-16: Evaluation study. Edinburgh, Scotland: Holmes McDougall.
- Tutiaux-Guillon, N. (2003). L’Enseignement et la compréhension de l’histoire sociale au collège et au lycee. L’Exemple de la société d’Ancien Régime et de la société du XIXe siècle. Lille, France: ANRT.
- van Drie, J. P., & van Boxtel, C. A. M. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87-110.
- Van Nieuwenhuyse, K., Wils, K., Clarebout, G., Draye, G., & Verschaffel, L. (2015). Making the constructed nature of history visible. Flemish secondary history education through the lens of written exams. In A. Chapman & A. Wilschut (Eds.), International review of history education. Joined-up history: New directions in history education research (pp. 311-333). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing (IAP).
- Vanhulle, B. (2009). The path of history: Narrative analysis of history textbooks — A case study of Belgian history textbooks (1945-2004). History of Education, 38(2), 263-282.
- Virta, A. (2001). Student teachers’ conceptions of history. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 2(1), 53-64.
- von Borries, B. (1994). (Re-)constructing history and moral judgment: On relationships between interpretations of the past and perceptions of the present. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and social sciences (pp. 339-355). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Voss, J. F., & Carretero, M. (Eds.). (1998). International review of history education. Vol. 2. Learning and reasoning in history. London, United Kingdom: Woburn.
- Wils, K., Schampaert, A., Clarebout, G., Cools, H., Albicher, A., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Past and present in contemporary history education. An exploratory empirical research on prospective history teachers. Yearbook – Jahrbuch – Annales, 32, 217–236.
- Wils, K., & Verschaffel, T. (Eds.). (2012). Longing for the present in the history of history education [Special issue]. Paedagogica Historica: International Journal of the History of Education, 48(6).
- Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.