Abstracts
Abstract
The connection between cognition and emotion, and between mind and body, has been well documented by neuroscience. The adult education practitioners of critical reflection and transformative learning processes have understood this more holistic understanding of human nature both empirically and intuitively. However, the key theory of the field, Jack Mezirow’s theory of transformative learning, has been given consistent criticism on its focus on rational and cognitive aspects of learning while understating its emotional and social aspects. Similarly, the conceptualization of the processes of reflection appears more appropriate to sophia than for phronesis. This, as is argued in the paper, leaves the theory rather idealistic while lacking understanding of the prerequisites for, and actualities of reflection. This paper presents a recent theoretical development that is both grounded in the analysis of Mezirow’s theory as well as extending and elaborating the theorization of reflection, by utilizing the insights from neuroscience. The presented theory explicates how cognition and emotion are intertwined in the processes of reflection. Further, the theory offers conceptual basis for further research and practice regarding reflection and transformative learning, not only showing the ideals, but offering conceptual tools to work with the challenges of reflection as well.
Keywords:
- reflection,
- critical reflection,
- transformative learning,
- emotion
Résumé
Les liens entre les aspects de la cognition et des émotions d’une part et entre l’esprit et le corps d’autre part ont été bien expliqués par les neurosciences. Les praticiens de la réflexion critique et des processus de l’apprentissage transformateurs dans le domaine de l’éducation des adultes ont bien saisi cette compréhension plus holistique de la nature humaine, d’une façon autant empirique qu’intuitive. Cependant, la théorie-clé dans ce domaine (la théorie de l’apprentissage transformateur de Mezirow), a fait l’objet de critiques quant à son intérêt pour les aspects rationnels et cognitifs de l’apprentissage. Mais peu de travaux ont étudié les dimensions émotionnelles et sociales de l’apprentissage transformateur.. De même, la conceptualisation des processus de réflexion semble relever davantagede la sophia que de la phronèsis. Cela conduit à considérer cette théorie d’un point de vue idéaliste. Cet article propose une réflexion théorique fondée sur l’analyse de la théorie de Mezirow et sur la compréhension des processus de conceptualisation de la réflexion en mobilisant les connaissances issues des neurosciences. La théorie présentée explique comment la cognition et les émotions sont étroitement liées dans les processus de réflexion. De plus, cette article propose une base conceptuelle et des outils à l’usage de praticiens souhaitant mobiliser la théorie de l’apprentissage transformateur.
Mots-clés :
- réflexion,
- réflexion critique,
- Apprentissage Transformateur,
- émotion
Appendices
Bibliography
- Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515.
- Beard, C. & Mälkki, K. (2013). Student transformation and the interaction between epistemological and the ontological tracks: The wider project of higher education? Interaction in Educational Domains. Tirri, K. & Kuusisto, E. (Eds.). Rotterdam : Sense Publishers, p. 25-36.
- Beard, C. & Wilson, J. P. (2006). Experiential Learning. A best practice handbook for educators and trainers. Second Edition. London : Kogan Page.
- Berger, J. (2004). Dancing on the Threshold of Meaning. Recognizing and Understanding the Growing Edge. Journal of Transformative Education 2(4), 336–351.
- Bleakley, A. (1999). From Reflective Practice to Holistic Reflexivity. Studies in Higher Education 24(3), 315–330.
- Boud, D. & Walker, D. (1998). Promoting reflection in professional courses: the challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education 23(2), 191–206.
- Brookfield, S. D. (1992). Developing criteria for formal theory building in adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(2), 79–93.
- Brookfield, S. D. (1994). Tales from the dark side: A phenomenography of adult critical reflection. International Journal of Lifelong Education 13(3), 203–216.
- Brookfield, S. D. (2006). The Skillfull Teacher: On Trust, Technique and Responsiveness in the Classroom. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
- Clark, M. C. & Wilson, A. L. (1991). Context and rationality in Mezirow’s theory of transformational learning. Adult Education Quarterly 41(2), 75–91.
- Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens. The Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Hart Court Brace.
- Davia, G. A. (1998). Thoughts on a Possible Rational Reconstruction of the Method of “Rational Reconstruction”. A paper presented at the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, Massachusetts, August 10–15, 1998. http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Scie/ScieDavi.htm Accessed May 21th 2014.
- Dewey, J. (1989). Essays and How we think, revised edition. The Later Works of John Dewey 1925-1953, Volume 8: 1989. Edited by J.A. Boydston. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville. Originally published in 1933: How we think.
- Dirkx, J. M. (2008). The meaning and role of emotions in adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 120, 7–18.
- Ecclestone, K. (1996). The reflective practitioner: mantra or a model for emancipation? Studies in the Education of Adults, 28(2), 146–161.
- Ecclestone, K. & Hayes, D. (2009). The dangerous rise of therapeutic education. London : Routledge.
- Fisher, C. (2003). Demystifying Critical Reflection: Defining criteria for assessment. Higher Education Research & Development 22(3), 313–325.
- Hammersley-Fletcher, L. & Orsmond, P. (2005). Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education 30 (2): 213–224.
- Hannus, S. & Simola, H. (2010). The Effects of Power Mechanisms in Education. Bringing Foucault and Bourdieu Together. Power and Education, 2(1), 1–17.
- Hatton, N. & Smith, D. 1995. Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching & Teacher Education 11: 33–49.
- Hoggan, C., Mälkki, K. & Green, L. (2017). Developing the theory of perspective transformation: Continuity, intersubjectivity and emancipatory praxis. Adult Education Quarterly.67 (1), p. 48–64.
- Holma, K. (2009). The strict analysis and open discussion. Journal of Philosophy of Education,43(3), 325-338. Also published in: Ruitenberg, C. (ed.) (2010). What Do Philosophers Of Education Do (And How Do They Do It)? Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell.
- Illeris, K. (2004). Transformative Learning in the Perspective of a Comprehensive Learning Theory. Journal of Transformative Education 2(2), 79–89.
- Illeris, K. (2007). How We Learn. Learning and non-learning in school and beyond. London : Routledge.
- Jokikokko, K. (2009.) The role of significant others in the intercultural learning of teachers. Journal of Research in International Education 8(2), 143–164.
- Jordi, R. (2011). Reframing the Concept of Reflection: Consciousness, Experiential Learning, and Reflective Learning Practices. Adult Education Quarterly 61, 181-197.
- Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M-L. (2007). Käsitteen muodostus. In: Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M-L. (ed.) Argumentti ja kritiikki. Lukemisen, keskustelemisen ja vakuuttamisen taidot. Helsinki : Gaudeamus, 328–367.
- Kitchener, K. S & King, P. M. 1990. The reflective judgment model: Transforming assumptions about knowing. In: Mezirow, J. and Associates. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 159-176.
- Kreber, C. 2004 An Analysis of Two Models of Reflection and their Implications for Educational Development. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 29–49.
- Kreber, C. & Castleden, H. 2009. Reflection on teaching and epistemological structure: reflective and critically reflective processes in ‘pure/soft’ and ‘pure/hard’ fields. Higher Education 57: 509–531.
- Malinen, A. (2000). Towards the essence of adult experiential learning. A reading of the theories of Knowles, Kolb, Mezirow, Revans and Schön. Jyväskylä: Sophi, University of Jyväskylä 2000.
- Mälkki, K. (2010). Building on Mezirow’s Theory of Transformative Learning: Theorizing the Challenges to Reflection. Journal of Transformative Education 8, 42-62.
- Mälkki, K. (2011). Theorizing the Nature of Reflection. University of Helsinki, Institute of Behavioural Sciences. Studies in Educational Sciences 238. Doctoral dissertation.
- Mälkki, K. (2012). Rethinking disorienting dilemmas within real-life crises: The role of reflection in negotiating emotionally chaotic experiences. Adult Education Quarterly 62, 207-229.
- Mälkki, K. (2019). Coming to grips with edge-emotions. The gateway to critical reflection and transformative learning. In: Kokkos, A., Finnegan, F. & Fleming, T.: , European Perspectives on Transformative Learning. Palgrave Macmillan (forthcoming).
- Mälkki, K. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). From reflection to action? Barriers and bridges between higher education teachers’ thoughts and actions. Studies in Higher Education 37, 33-50.
- Mälkki, K. & Green, L. (2014). Navigational Aids: The Phenomenology of Transformative Learning. Journal of Transformative Education. 12, 1, p. 5-24
- Mälkki, K. & Green, L (2016a). Ground, warmth, and light: Facilitating conditions for reflection and transformative dialogue. Journal of Educational Issues 2(2), 169-183.
- Mälkki, K. & Green, L. (2016b). Micro-transformations of everyday life: Addressing the transformative potential of the intersection between our meaning perspectives and daily challenges. Engaging at the Intersections: Proceedings of the XII International Transformative Learning Conference, October 20- October 23, 2016, Tacoma, Washington, Pacific Lutheran University. Nicolaides, A. & Holt, D. (Eds.). Transformative Learning Network, p. 430-436.
- Mälkki, K. & Green, L. (2016c). Beyond dichotomies in researching transformative learning: The dialectical relationship between the social ”urge to merge” and the individual quest for authenticity. Engaging at the Intersections: Proceedings of the XII International Transformative Learning Conference, October 20- October 23, 2016, Tacoma, Washington, Pacific Lutheran University. Nicolaides, A. & Holt, D. (Eds.). Transformative Learning Network, p. 387-393.
- McAlpine, L., Weston, C. (2000). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning. Instructional Science 28: 363–385.
- Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education 32(1), 3–24.
- Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco-Oxford : Jossey-Bass.
- Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. Core concepts of transformation theory. In: Mezirow, J. and Associates. Learning as transformation. Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 3–33.
- Mezirow, J. (2007). Personal communication with the author. New York, December 1st, 2007.
- Mezirow, J. (2009). An overview on transformative learning. In: Illeris, K. (ed.) Contemporary Theories of Learning… Learning theorists in their own words. London : Routledge, 90–105.
- Miettinen, R. 2000. The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19 (1), 54–72.
- Moon, J. (2004). A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning: Theory and Practice. London : Routledge Falmer.
- Morgan, A. (2017) Cultivating critical reflection: educators making sense and meaning of professional identity and relational dynamics in complex practice. Teaching Education, Vol 28 (1), p. 41-55.
- Peltonen, J. (2009). Kasvatustieteen teoria-käytäntö-suhde. Teoreetikoiden ja praktikoiden vuoropuhelua. [The relationship between theory and practice in the science of education: conversations between theorists and practitioners.] Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, E 106. Oulu : Oulun Yliopisto.
- Postareff, L. (2007). Teaching in Higher Education: From Content-focused to Learning-focused Approaches to Teaching. Research report. University of Helsinki, Department of Education; 214.
- Procee, H. (2006). Reflection in Education: A Kantian Epistemology. Educational Theory, 56(3), 237–253
- Rorty, R. (1984). The historiography of philosophy: four genres. In: Rorty, R., Schneewind, J.B. and Skinner, Q. (ed.) Philosophy in History, Cambridge, 49–76.
- Ruitenberg, C. (ed.) (2010). What Do Philosophers Of Education Do (And How Do They Do It)? Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell.
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
- Taylor, E. W. [1997]. Building upon the theoretical debate: A critical review of the empirical studies of Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 34-59.
- Taylor, E. W. [2007]. An update of transformative learning theory: a critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education26(2), 173–191.
- Taylor, E. W. [2008]. Transformative Learning Theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 119, 5–16.
- Trigg, R. (2001). Understanding Social Science: A philosophical introduction to the social sciences. Blackwell.
- Whetten, D. A. (1989). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.