Seasonal variation in Blueberry scorch virus concentration in highbush blueberry and implications for disease monitoring and management

Raworth, David A.; Mathur, Sneh

doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/038982ar

Introduction>

Blueberry scorch virus (BlScV), a Carlavirus, has been found in highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum L., in North America (Bristow et al. 2000; Cavileer et al. 1994; Martin and Bristow 1988) and Europe (Ciuffo et al. 2005). The virus can cause blighting of stems, leaves and flowers, and significant yield reductions in susceptible cultivars (Bristow et al. 2000). Symptom expression also varies with virus strain (Wegener et al. 2006). BlScV is aphid-borne and has a non-persistent mode of transmission (Bristow et al. 2000). Control of the aphid vectors and early detection and removal of infected plants is recommended to manage BlScV (British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture and Lands 2007).

The epidemiology of BlScV depends on several factors, including the population dynamics and transmission efficiency of aphid vectors, the number of infected plants within a field, and virus concentration in the infected plants. Ericaphis fimbriata (Richards) (=Fimbriaphis fimbriata) (Remaudière and Remaudière 1997) [Hemiptera: Aphididae], the dominant colonizing aphid on highbush blueberry in southwestern British Columbia, Canada (Raworth 2004), has been regarded as the most important vector of BlScV in studies conducted in Washington, USA (Bristow et al. 2000), although non-colonizing species may also be involved (Lowery et al. 2008). Ericaphis fimbriata has a consistent population pattern among years and locations; populations increase exponentially throughout the spring to reach a peak of 0.8 to 16.1 aphids per leaf terminal (300 to 9000 aphids per bush) in late June or early July, and then decline rapidly due to reduced plant quality for the aphids and natural enemies (Raworth 2004; Raworth and Schade 2006). More than 80 species of winged migrant aphids have been found in commercial blueberry fields in southwestern British Columbia (Raworth et al. 2006); however, spatial and temporal numerical patterns often depend on field, year, season and species peculiarities. Ericaphis fimbriata is not an efficient vector and, therefore, aphid numbers are important in virus transmission (Bristow et al. 2000). Nothing is known of the seasonal variation in BlScV concentration but, given the importance of aphid numbers, the synchrony between aphid population dynamics and temporal changes in BlScV concentration may affect the epidemiology. Fluctuations in concentration of other viruses at different stages of crop development have been reported in garlic (Dovas et al. 2002), red spruce (Bachand and Castello 1998), and peach (Dal Zotto et al. 1999; Polák 1995, 1998).

The purpose of the current work was to determine 1) the temporal variation in BlScV concentration in infected highbush blueberry cultivars in the field during the growing season; 2) whether or not the variation is consistent among cultivars; and 3) the implications of the findings for disease management and the timing of BlScV surveys, aphid transmission studies and virus purification.

Materials and methods

Two ‘Dixi’, two ‘Jersey’ and two ’Rubel’ bushes, all BlScV positive, approximately 2 m tall, and located near the epicentre of an infected area in a commercial field in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, were sampled in 2007. The plants were more than 15 yr old, and had probably become infected with BlScV between 1989 (MacDonald and Martin 1990) and 2001 (Field 2-Richmond (Wegener et al. 2006)). Ten flower buds or clusters were collected - without reference to symptoms or other physical characteristics - from different parts of a bush every 2 wk between 14 March and 15 May (five sample dates for ’Dixi’ and ’Jersey’, and four for ’Rubel’), and 10 leaf buds or terminals (all leaves and stem arising from a bud) were collected between 2 April and 11 September (11 sample dates). Each bud or terminal was stored in a separate plastic bag. Samples were kept on ice in the field and then at -20°C until processing.

The samples were tested for BlScV in November 2007 using double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) according to Clark and Adams (1977), except that the grinding buffer followed that of Martin and Bristow (1988). The entire bud or terminal was weighed and then homogenized in buffer. Sample weight to buffer volume ratio (g:ml) was held constant at 1:10 so that the quantity of sample extract from the small buds would be sufficient for DAS-ELISA tests. Samples from 14 March to 19 June were homogenized using a pestle and mortar, which was washed thoroughly under running water between samples. The remaining samples were homogenized in a wet-dry grinder (Revel CCM101, Revel Inc., Houston, TX, USA). Samples were analyzed using DAS-ELISA with optical density (OD) readings at 1 h, 2 h, and overnight (Phyto Diagnostics Co. Ltd., North Saanich, BC, Canada). Data needed to convert OD readings to relative virus concentration were obtained by simultaneously analyzing serial dilutions (10x, 20x, 40x, 80x and 160x) of extract from three of the samples.

Plant samples were considered infected if the OD readings were three or more times greater than the mean of the negative plate controls (Pataky et al. 2004; Sutula et al. 1986). Because virus concentration was the variable of interest, and it was not a linear function of the OD readings, relative virus concentration was calculated for each BlScV-positive OD reading prior to analysis using a relationship of the form y = e^{(a + bx)}, where y was relative virus concentration [(1/ dilution) * 1000] and x was OD reading. The 2 h OD readings provided the greatest r ² (0.96) for the serial dilution data and a mean intercept (a = 0.40 ± 0.21 SE, Fig. 1A); b (2.52) was then calculated by fitting the equation to pass through the maximum OD reading in the data set (1.67) at the relative concentration of 100 [(1/10) * 1000] (Fig. 1B). This approach allowed comparisons of relative virus concentration among cultivars and sample dates.

Figure 1

**Serial dilution data for three samples (circles, crossed circles, dark circles), with regressions (A), and the relationship used to convert DAS-ELISA OD readings to relative virus concentration (B).**

Statistical analyses were performed on means and proportions calculated from the 10 samples collected from each replicate plant at every sample date: mean relative BlScV concentration per g of infected plant tissue (i.e. samples with OD readings less than three times the negative controls were deleted before calculating the mean); mean relative BlScV concentration per infected bud, flower cluster or leaf terminal obtained by multiplying the relative concentration per g of tissue by the tissue weight; and the proportion of infected samples. The data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA (PROC-GLM, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to determine the effect of cultivar (2,3 df for flower cluster and leaf terminal samples), time (3,9 df for flower clusters and 10,30 df for leaf terminals), and the cultivar-by-time interaction (6,9 df for flower clusters and 20,30 df for leaf terminals) on the respective variables. The proportion of infected samples was transformed by arcsin square root before analysis. Standard errors were calculated from the appropriate residual mean-squared errors. This approach was used because there were insufficient numbers of plant subjects to analyze the variance-covariance structure; we therefore assumed homogeneity of variances and covariances.

Results

Mean relative BlScV concentration per g of infected leaf terminal and flower cluster in 2007 did not vary with cultivar (P > 0.28), but did vary with time (P < 0.0002), and the cultivar-by-time interaction was significant (P < 0.03 in each case). BlScV concentration in ’Dixi’ leaf tissue increased almost continuously, while concentration in ’Jersey’ increased until early June and then decreased and levelled out, and concentration in ’Rubel’ increased until mid-June and then declined (Fig. 2). Concentration in flower clusters increased rapidly to almost twice the maximum level in leaf terminals with the exception of ’Rubel’ in which concentration was relatively high initially and did not change with time (Fig. 2).

Figure 2

**Mean relative BlScV concentration per g of highbush blueberry tissue versus time.**

The proportion of infected leaf buds or terminals did not vary with cultivar (P = 0.21), but it varied with time (P < 0.0001). The proportion of infected flower buds or clusters varied with cultivar (P = 0.002) and time (P = 0.006); there was no cultivar-by-time interaction for either leaf or flower tissue (P > 0.34). The proportion of BlScV-infected samples increased through April to reach an asymptote of approximately 0.9 for leaf terminals, and to 1.0 for ’Dixi’ and ’Jersey’ flower clusters, but no asymptote was evident for ’Rubel’, the proportion of infected flower clusters increasing to 0.6 (Fig. 3).

Figure 3

**Mean proportion of BlScV-infected highbush blueberry samples versus time (arcsin squared-root transformed data).**

Mean relative BlScV concentration per infected leaf bud or terminal did not vary with cultivar (P = 0.23) but it did vary with time (P < 0.0001), and the cultivar-by-time interaction was significant (P = 0.001). Concentration in leaf terminals increased at the same rate in all three cultivars until early June and then diverged, with ’Dixi’ increasing most rapidly, ’Jersey’ less rapidly, and ’Rubel’ reaching an asymptote (Fig. 4). Concentration per flower bud or cluster did not vary with cultivar (P = 0.11) but it did vary with time (P < 0.0001), and the cultivar-by-time interaction was significant (P = 0.005); final concentration in ’Rubel’ was lower than in ’Dixi’ and ’Jersey’ (Fig. 4). Concentration per flower cluster did not increase to the level observed in leaf terminals because final flower cluster weight was smaller than leaf terminal weight later in the season: mean leaf terminal weight increased from 0.03 ± 0.001 to 5.8 ± 0.7 g whereas flower cluster weight increased from 0.07 ± 0.03 to 0.5 ± 0.02 g.

Figure 4

**Mean relative BlScV concentration per highbush blueberry sample versus time.**

Discussion

The results have implications for sampling. BlScV surveys generally involve collecting mature leaves from a plant or group of plants. However, surveys could be conducted in early May using flower clusters to take advantage of their high virus concentration relative to that of leaf tissue collected later in the season (Fig. 2). If leaf tissue is sampled, our results suggest that studies of temporal variation in BlScV concentration are needed for each of the principal cultivars in a production area to determine optimal timing. The results of Dal Zotto et al. (1999), Torrance and Dolby (1984) and Varveri et al. (1997) corroborate this view for different virus-host plant systems. Similar cultivar-related considerations will undoubtedly affect aphid transmission studies and collection of plant tissue for virus purification.

BlScV concentration varied throughout the season (Fig. 2), and temporal patterns were different among the cultivars ’Dixi’, ’Jersey’, and ’Rubel’. However, the seasonal change in virus concentration was small compared with changes in numbers of a known BlScV vector, E. fimbriata, which colonizes highbush blueberry in the Pacific Northwest: Raworth (2004) found that populations of this aphid increase more than threefold during the spring. If virus concentrations in other cultivars show a seasonal variation comparable to that found here, then in general, one would expect E. fimbriata populations, rather than BlScV concentration, to be the more important factor driving virus transmission, and this should result in transmissions during June and July when E. fimbriata populations peak (cf. Raworth 2004). This prediction is supported by Raworth et al. (2008); 7 out of 938 trap plants placed in two BlScV-positive blueberry fields for 2-wk periods during 2001-2003 became infected in June and July while one became infected in May, and no other infections were detected. This result also concurs with Bristow et al. (2000). However, the effect of migrant aphids in this system is unknown. Raworth et al. (2006) found more than 80 aphid species migrating in blueberry fields; further work is needed to determine the vector status of a selection of some of these species. Until that work is done, the potential effect of the colonizing aphid E. fimbriata on BlScV transmission provides a good rationale for chemically controlling this species; not in June, when aphid numbers are typically high, but early in the season, after egg hatch and before exponential population increase (Raworth and Schade 2006) and production of alatae in May (Raworth 2004).

Abstract

Résumé

Introduction>

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion

Acknowledgements

References

List of figures

Abstracts

Abstract

Résumé

Article body

Introduction>

Materials and methods

Results

Discussion

Appendices

Acknowledgements

References

List of figures

Citation Tools

Cite this article

Export the record for this article