Abstracts
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the barriers to, and possibilities of, recognizing individuals labelled intellectually disabled as producers and contributors to knowledge about their experiences. Through engaging perspectives within the fields of philosophy of education and disability studies, we examine contrasting research about the use of facilitated communication, an augmentative and alternative communication technique for teaching people with disabilities to communicate through pointing, or typing with support provided by a communication partner. We examine how researchers impose demands for the scientific validation of facilitated communication and use such demands to discredit autistic people identified with intellectual disabilities in their attempts to be recognized as knowers and producers of knowledge. Our analysis calls into question whether self-imposed limitations on contemporary knowledge production render educational research (in)capable of accepting forms of evidence that will facilitate the agency of those labelled or regarded as intellectually disabled and (in)capable of providing consumers of educational research access to knowledge that reflects the wide range of communicative, neurocognitive, and intellectual diversity in schools and communities.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Ashby, C. (2010). The trouble with normal: The struggle for meaningful access for middle school students with developmental disabilities. Disability and Society, 25(3), 345–358.
- Ashby, C. (2011). Whose “voice” is it anyway?: Giving voice and qualitative research involving individuals that type to communicate. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(4).
- Ashby, C., & Causton-Theoharis, J. (2012). “Moving quietly through the door of opportunity”: Perspectives of college students who type to communicate. Equity and Excellence in Education, 45(2), 261–282.
- Ashby, C., Jung, E., Woodfield, C., Vroman, K., & Orsati, F. (2015). ‘Wishing to go it alone’: The complicated interplay of independence, interdependence and agency. Disability and Society, 30(10), 1,474–1,489.
- Barmache (2019). Letter by letter. In E. Peña (Ed.), Communication alternatives in autism: Perspectives on typing and spelling approaches for the nonspeaking (pp. 95–114). Toplight.
- Bebko, J., Perry, A., & Bryson, S. (1996). Multiple method validation study of facilitated communication: Individual differences and subgroup results. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26.
- Bomba, C., O’Donnell, L., Markowitz, C., & Holmes, D. (1996). Evaluating the impact of facilitated communication on the communicative competence of fourteen students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26(1), 43–58.
- Bennett, A. B. (2011). “Freedom herself is very agile, very co-dependent, and a lovely person”: The school identities of high school aged youth with communication differences. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(4).
- Biklen, D. (2012). Begin by presuming competence. UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/media-services/single-view/news/douglas_biklen_begin_by_presuming_competence.
- Biklen, D. (with Attfield, R., Bissonnette, L., Blackman, L., Frugone, A., Mukhopadhyay, T. R., Rubin, S., & Burke, J.). (2005). Autism and the myth of the person alone. NYU Press.
- Biklen, D., & Burke, J. (2006). Presuming competence. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(2), 166–175.
- Biklen, D., & Cardinal, D. N. (1997). Contested words, contested science: Unraveling the facilitated communication controversy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Biklen, D., & Kliewer, C. (2006). Constructing competence: Autism, voice and the “disordered” body. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10(2–3), 169–188.
- Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. (1976). The judged, not the judges: An insider's view of mental retardation. American Psychologist, 31(1), 47–52.
- Broderick, A. A., & Kasa-Hendrickson, C. (2001). “Say just one word at first”: The emergence of reliable speech in a student labeled with autism. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26(1), 13–24.
- Broderick, A. A., & Kasa-Hendrickson, C. (2006). “I am thinking that speech is asinine”: Narrating complexities and rethinking the notion of “independence” in communication. Equity and Excellence in Education, 39, 176–186.
- Bottema-Beutel, K., Kapp, S. K., Lester, J. N., Sasson, N. J., & Hand, B. N. (2021). Avoiding ableist language: Suggestions for autism researchers. Autism in Adulthood, 3(1).
- Cardinal, D. N., & Falvey, M. A. (2014). The maturing of facilitated communication: A means toward independent communication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(3), 189–194.
- Cardinal, D., Hanson, D., & Wakeham, J. (1996). An investigation of authorship in facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 34, 231–242.
- Clare, E. (2017). Brilliant imperfection: Grappling with cure. Duke University Press.
- Cook, B., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T., McWilliam, R., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children: Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children. https://cecpioneers.exceptionalchildren.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/EBP_FINAL.pdf.
- Courchesne, V., Meilleur, A. A., Poulin-Lord, M. P., Dawson, M., & Soulières, I. (2015). Autistic children at risk of being underestimated: school-based pilot study of a strength-informed assessment. Molecular autism, (6)12.
- Crossley, R. (1994). Facilitated communication training. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Danforth, S. (1997). On what basis of hope?: Modern and postmodern possibilities. Mental Retardation, 35(2), 93–106.
- Danforth, S. (2006). From epistemology to democracy: Pragmatism and the reorientation of disability research. Remedial and special education, 27(6), 337–345.
- Dindar, K., Lindblom, A., & Kärnä, E. (2017). The construction of communicative (in)competence in autism: A focus on methodological decisions. Disability and Society, 32(6), 868–891.
- Donnellan, A. (1984). The criterion of the least dangerous assumption. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 141–150.
- Donnellan, A. M., Hill, D. A., & Leary, M. R. (2013). Rethinking autism: Implications of sensory and movement differences for understanding and support. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6.
- Eberlin, M., McConnachie, G., Ibel, S., & Volpe, L. (1993). Facilitated communication: A failure to replicate the phenomenon. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23(3), 507–530.
- Emerson, A., Grayson, A., & Griffiths, A. (2001). Can’t or won’t?: Evidence relating to authorship in facilitated communication. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36(1), 98–103.
- Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
- Gallagher, D. J. (Ed.). (2004). Challenging orthodoxy in special education: Dissenting voices. Love Publishing.
- Gallagher, D. J. (2006). If not absolute objectivity, then what? A reply to Kauffman and Sasso. Exceptionality, 14(2), 91–107.
- Goode, D. A. (1994). World without words: The social construction of children born deaf and blind. Temple University Press.
- Grayson, A., Emerson A., Howard-Jones, P., & O’Neil, L. (2012). Hidden communicative competence: Case study evidence using eye-tracking and video analysis. Autism, 16, 75–86.
- Higashida, N. (2013). The reason I jump: The inner voice of a thirteen-year-old boy with autism. Knopf Canada.
- Hemsley, B., Bryant, L., Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H. C., Lang, R., Paul, D., Banajee, M., & Ireland, M. (2018). Systematic review of facilitated communication 2014–2018 finds no new evidence that messages delivered using facilitated communication are authored by the person with disability. Autism and Developmental Language Impairments, 3.
- Institute on Communication and Inclusion. (2000). ICI training standards manual. Institute on Communication and Inclusion. https://disabilityinclusioncenter.syr.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2020/12/Training_Standards_Manual.pdf.
- Jaswal, V., & Akhtar, N. (2019). Being versus appearing socially uninterested: Challenging assumptions about social motivation in autism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, E82.
- Jorgensen, C. M. (2005). The least dangerous assumption: A challenge to create a new paradigm. Disability Solutions, 6(3), 1, 5–9.
- Jorgensen, C. M., McSheehan, M., & Sonnenmeier, R. M. (2007). Presumed competence reflected in the educational programs of students with IDD before and after the Beyond Access professional development intervention. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32(4), 248–262.
- Kasa-Hendrickson, C., Broderick, A. A., & Hanson, D. (2009). Sorting out speech: Understanding multiple methods of communication for persons with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(2), 116–133.
- Kauffman, J. M., & Sasso, G. M. (2006). Toward ending cultural and cognitive relativism in special education. Exceptionality, 14(2), 65–90.
- Kliewer, C., Biklen, D., & Kasa-Hendrickson, C. (2006). Who may be literate?: Disability and resistance to the cultural denial of competence. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 163–192.
- Kliewer, C., Biklen, D., & Petersen, A. (2015). At the end of intellectual disability. Harvard Education Review, 25(1), 1–28.
- Baglieri, S., & Lalvani, P. (2019). Undoing ableism: Teaching about disability in K-12 classrooms. Routledge.
- Baglieri, S., Valle, J. W., Connor, D. J., & Gallagher, D. J. (2011). Disability studies in education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. Remedial and Special Education, 32(4), 267–278.
- Lester, J. N., & Nusbaum, E. A. (2017). “Reclaiming” disability in critical qualitative research: Introduction to the special issue. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(1), 3–7.
- Lilienfeld, S. O., Marshall, J., Todd, J. T., & Shane, H. C. (2015). The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8(2), 62–101.
- Linneman, R. D. (2001). Idiots: Stories about mindedness and mental retardation. Peter Lang.
- Marcus, E., & Shevin, M. (1997). Sorting it out under fire: Our journey. In D. Biklen & D. N. Cardinal (Eds.), Contested words, contested science: Unraveling the facilitated communication controversy (pp. 31–58). Teachers College.
- McKee, A., & Gomez, A. S. (2020). The voices of typers: Examining the educational experience of individuals who use facilitated communication. Disability Studies Quarterly, 40(4).
- Mostert, M. P. (2014). An activist approach to debunking FC. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(3), 203–210.
- Peña, E. (2019). Communication alternatives in autism. Toplight Books.
- Rossetti, Z., Ashby, C., Arndt, K., Chadwick, M., & Kasahara, M. (2008). “I like others to not try to fix me”: Agency, independence, and autism. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 364–375.
- Rubin, S., Biklen, D., Kasa-Hendrickson, C., Kluth, P., Cardinal, D. N., & Broderick, A. (2001). Independence, participation, and the meaning of intellectual ability. Disability and Society, 16, 415–429.
- Samuels, E. (2014). Fantasies of identification: Disability, gender, race (vol. 10). NYU Press.
- Sequenzia, A. (2015, Mar. 24). Demanding, not asking, to be valued. Autism Women’s Network. http://autismwomensnetwork.org/demanding-not-asking-to-be-valued.
- Shane, H., & Kearns, K. (1994). An examination of the role of the facilitator in “facilitated communication.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 48–54.
- Sheehan, C., & Matuozzi, R. (1996) Validation of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 34, 94–107.
- Taylor, A. (2018). Knowledge citizens? Intellectual disability and the production of social meanings within educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 88(1), 1–25.
- Taylor, A. (2021). The moral significance of epistemic agency: Intellectual disability and communities of knowers [virtual lecture]. Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance 2021 Speaker Series. Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Thresher, T. (2019). Finding my voice through typing. In E. Peña (Ed.), Communication alternatives in autism: Perspectives on typing and spelling approaches for the nonspeaking (pp. 27–40). Toplight.
- Torres, E. B., Brincker, M., Isenhower III, R. W., Yanovich, P., Stigler, K. A., Nurnberger Jr, J. I., Metaxas, D. N., & José, J. V. (2013). Autism: The micro-movement perspective. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 32(7).
- Travers, J. C. (2017) Evaluating claims to avoid pseudoscientific and unproven practices in special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(4), 195–203.
- Travers, J. C., & Ayers, K. M. (2015). A critique of presuming competence of learners with autism or other developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(4), 371–387.
- Travers, J. C., Tincani, M. J., & Lang, R. (2014). Facilitated communication denies people with disabilities their voice. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(3), 195–202.
- Tostanoski, A., Lang, R., Raulston, T., Carnett, A., & Davis, T. (2014) Voices from the past: Comparing the rapid prompting method and facilitated communication. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17(4), 219–223.
- Tuzzi, A. (2009). Grammar and lexicon in individuals with autism: A quantitative analysis of a large Italian corpus. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 373–385.
- Vyse, S., Hemsley, B., Lang, R., Lilienfeld, S., Mostert, M., Schlinger, H., Shane, H. C., Sherry, M., & Todd, J. T. (2019). Whose words are these?: Statements derived from facilitated communication and rapid prompting method undermine the credibility of Jaswal and Akhtar’s social motivation hypotheses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, E113.
- Weiss, M., Wagner, S., and Bauman, M. (1996). A validated case study of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 34, 220–230.
- Wheeler, D., Jacobson, J., Paglieri, R., & Schwartz, A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 31, 49–60.
- Williams, R. M. (2020). Falsified incompetence and other lies the positivists told me. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 9(5), 214–244.
- Wilson, M., de Jonge, D., de Souza, N., & Carlson, G. (2014). Facilitated communication training: Exploration of perceptions of ability and reducing physical support. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(1).
- Wombles, K. (2014). Some fads never die – they only hide behind other names: Facilitated communication is not and never will be augmentative and alternative communication. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8(4), 181–186.
- Woodfield, C., Jung, E., & Ashby, C. (2014). “Hoping for greatness:” Exploring the notion of “novicity” in communication support partnerships. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(4), 274–289.
- Wurzburg, G. (Director), & Biklen, D. (Producer) (2010). Wretches & Jabberers [documentary]. United States: State of the Art.
- Yergeau, M. (2018). Authoring autism. Duke University Press.
- Zurcher-Long, E. (2019). I am Emma. In E. Peña (Ed.), Communication alternatives in autism: Perspectives on typing and spelling approaches for the nonspeaking (pp. 129–142). Toplight.