Abstracts
Summary
The global financial crisis beginning in 2008 resulted in a ballooning public debt and government efforts to constrain public expenditures. Responses to the financial crisis and its impact on human services in Ontario demonstrate the complex interactions across key actors – employers, government, unions, and family advocates. Building on previous scholarship which has explored the role of end-users as industrial relations actors (Bellemare, 2000; Kessler and Bach, 2011) this study deepens our understanding of the role and impact of end-users on the process and outcomes of industrial relations in the social services sector. The main contribution of the paper shows how end-users play unique and complex roles as industrial relations actors in Ontario’s developmental services sector. End-users have had a significant impact at three distinct levels of the industrial relations system (Bellemare, 2000). First, at the strategic level of public policy, in addition to the more traditional forms of grassroots lobbying, end-users have taken on formal roles in the governance network shaping public policy. The impacts of end-user advocacy have contributed to the significant transformation of the developmental services sector, including the closure of the remaining provincially-run institutions in 2009. Second, at the organizational level, end-users have displaced the traditional roles of employers. In some cases, this displacement has resulted in end-users operating as co-managers, with end-user management rights enshrined in collective agreements. In more significant ways, end-users have entirely replaced agency-based managers and become the employer of direct support staff. Third, end-users have driven changes at the level of the work process itself, going beyond the co-production of services, contributing to changes in the nature of direct support work. The work process has shifted from a focus on custodial care to more complex objectives of community development and social inclusion.
Keywords:
- direct support workers,
- developmental services,
- unions,
- transformation
Résumé
Dans la foulée de la crise financière et économique, le gouvernement de l’Ontario s’est engagé à réduire les dépenses publiques. Sur la base d’une étude détaillée, cet article illustre comment, dans ce contexte, les usagers s’imposent comme des acteurs-clés des transformations qui touchent le secteur des services d’aide et de support aux personnes souffrant d’un handicap. L’étude permet ainsi de mieux saisir le rôle important, mais complexe, joué par les usagers dans les transformations qui ont lieu dans les formes de prestations des services et de régulation du travail. Les usagers ont un impact significatif à au moins trois niveaux du système des relations industrielles (Bellemare, 2000). Au niveau stratégique, ils sont des acteurs de la gouvernance des réseaux d’élaboration des politiques publiques sans pour autant délaisser les activités traditionnelles de lobbying. Les organisations représentant les usagers ont, par exemple, joué un rôle central dans la fermeture des établissements publics de traitement des personnes avec des déficiences intellectuelles en faveur de l’insertion dans la communauté. Au niveau organisationnel ensuite, les usagers occupent de plus en plus le rôle d’employeur. Cela peut prendre la forme d’un régime de cogestion des services avec, en plus, l’inscription des droits des usagers dans les conventions collectives de travail ou encore celui d’employeur à part entière et ainsi se substituer aux agences gouvernementales. Enfin, les usagers participent à la transformation du procès de travail lorsque, par exemple, ils redéfinissent la finalité du rôle d’intervenant social pour y inclure des objectifs complexes de développement de la personne et d’inclusion sociale. Bref, le cas du secteur des services aux personnes handicapées illustre que les réponses à la crise financière sont façonnées par l’action des usagers qui doivent être considérés comme des acteurs du système des relations industrielles.
Mots-clés:
- travailleur de soutien direct,
- services de développement,
- syndicats,
- transformation
Resumen
Bajo el impacto de la crisis financiera y económica, el gobierno de Ontario se ha comprometido a reducir los gastos públicos. Sobre la base de un estudio detallado, este artículo ilustra cómo, en este contexto, los usuarios se imponen como actores claves de las transformaciones que afectan el sector de servicios de ayuda y de apoyo a las personas que sufren de un hándicap. El estudio permite captar mejor el rol importante, pero complejo, que juegan los usuarios en las transformaciones que se llevan a cabo en las formas de prestaciones de servicios y de regulación del trabajo. Los usuarios tienen un impacto significativo al menos en tres niveles del sistema de relaciones industriales (Bellemare, 2000). A nivel estratégico, ellos son actores de la gobernanza de redes de elaboración de políticas públicas sin abandonar sin embargo las actividades tradicionales de lobbying. Las organizaciones que representan los usuarios han jugado, por ejemplo, un rol central en el cierre de establecimientos públicos de tratamientos de personas con deficiencias intelectuales favoreciendo así la inserción en la comunidad. A nivel organizacional, los usuarios ocupan cada vez más el rol de empleador. Eso puede tomar la forma de un régimen de cogestión de servicios con la inscripción de derechos de los usuarios en las convenciones colectivas de trabajo o también, del empleador de pleno derecho pudiendo remplazar las agencias gubernamentales. Por ultimo, los usuarios participan a la transformación del proceso de trabajo cuando, por ejemplo, redefinen la finalidad del rol de intervención social para incluir los objetivos complejos de desarrollo de la persona y de inclusión social. En resumen, el caso del sector de servicios a las personas con hándicap ilustra que las respuestas a la crisis financiera son forjadas por la acción de los usuarios que deben ser considerados como actores del sistema de relaciones industriales.
Palabras claves:
- trabajador de apoyo directo,
- servicios de desarrollo,
- sindicatos,
- transformación
Download the article in PDF to read it. Download
Appendices
References
- Baines, D. 2004a. “Caring for Nothing: Work Organization and Unwaged Labour in Social Services.” Work, Employment and Society, 18 (2), 267-295.10.1177/09500172004042770 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Baines, D. 2004b. “Pro-Market, Non-Market: The Dual Nature of Organizational Change in Social Services Delivery.” Critical Social Policy, 24 (1), 5-29.10.1177/0261018304039679 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Baines, D. 2010. “In a Different Way: Social Unionism in the Nonprofit Social Services: An Australian/Canadian Comparison.” Labor Studies Journal, 35 (4), 480-502.10.1177/0950017011419710 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Baines, D., and I. Cunningham. 2011. “‘White Knuckle Care Work’: Violence, Gender and New Public Management in the Voluntary Sector.” Work, Employment and Society, 25 (4), 760-776.10.1177/0950017011419710 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Barnes, M., and D. Prior. 1995. “Spoilt for Choice: How Consumerism Can Disempower Public-Service Users.” Public Money and Management, 15 (3), 53-58.10.1080/09540969509387882 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Barnes, M., and A. Walker. 1996. “Consumerism versus Empowerment: A Principled Approach to the Involvement of Older Service Users.” Policy and Politics, 24 (4), 375-393.10.1332/030557396782148417 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bellemare, G. 2000. “End-users: Actors in the Industrial Relations System?” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38 (3), 383-405.10.1111/1467-8543.00170 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Beresford, P., and S. Croft. 2004. “Service Users and Practitioners Reunited: The Key Component for Social Work Reform.” British Journal of Social Work, 34 (1), 53-68.10.1093/bjsw/bch005 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Borbasi, S., V. Bottroff, R. P. Williams, J. Jones and H. Douglas. 2008. “‘No Going Back’ to Institutional Care for People with Severe Disability: Reflections on Practice through an Interpretive Study.” Disability and Rehabilitation, 30 (11), 837-847.10.1080/09638280701419359 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Braddock, D. L., and D. Mitchell. 1992. Residential Services and Developmental Disabilities in the United States: A National Survey of Staff Compensation, Turnover, and Related Issues. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.10.2307/2525082 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Breihan, A. W. 2007. “Who Chooses Service Providers? The Spread of Consumer Choice, 1992-2004.” Intellectual Developmental Disabilities, 45 (6), 365-372.10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[365:WCSPTS]2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, K. 1997. “The Role of Union Strategies in NLRB Certification Elections.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 50 (2), 195-212.10.2307/2525082 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, K., and R. Hickey. 2004. “Changing to Organize: A National Assessment of Union Organizing Strategies.” Rebuilding Labor: Organizing and Organizers in the New Union Movement. R. Milkman, and K. Voss, eds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 17-61.10.1177/0261018306075717 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Brook, P. 2007. “Customer Oriented Militants? A Critique of the ‘Customer Oriented Bureaucracy’ Theory on Front-line Service Worker Collectivism.” Work, Employment and Society, 21 (2), 363-374.10.1177/0950017007076645 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Caldwell, J. 2006. “Consumer-directed Supports: Economic, Health, and Social Outcomes for Families.” Mental Retardation, 44 (6), 405-417.10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[405:CSEHAS]2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Carr, S. 2007. “Participation, Power, Conflict and Change: Theorizing Dynamics of Service User Participation in the Social Care System of England and Wales.” Critical Social Policy, 27 (2), 266-276.10.1177/0261018306075717 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cumella, S. 2008. “New Public Management and Public Services for People with an Intellectual Disability: A Review of the Implementation of Valuing People in England.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 5 (3), 178-186.10.1111/j.1741-1130.2008.00171.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cunningham, I. 2008. “A Race to the Bottom? Exploring Variations in Employment Conditions in the Voluntary Sector.” Public Administration, 86 (4), 1033-1053.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00752.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- CUPE. 2008. CUPE Ontario Submission on Bill 77: The Services for Persons with Disabilities Act. CUPE Research, Canadian Union of Public Employees.10.1093/jopart/muh012 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Denhardt, J. V., and R. B. Denhardt. 2003. The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.10.1111/j.1468-2338.2011.00636.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Drummond, D. 2012. Public Services for Ontarians: A Path to Sustainability and Excellence. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.10.1002/mrdd.20151 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Dunlop, J. T. 1958. Industrial Relations Systems. New York: Holt.10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<169:PSAOCT>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Eakin, L., and M. Thelander. 2005. Beyond Numbers: The Implications of Financial Restraints and Changing Needs on Developmental Services. Lynn Eakin and Associates for the Metro Agencies Representatives Council.10.1352/2008.46:239-242 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Finlay, W. M. L., C. Walton and C. Antaki. 2008. “Promoting Choice and Control in Residential Services for People with Learning Disabilities.” Disability and Society, 23 (4), 349-360.10.1080/09687590802038860 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.10.1352/0047-6765(2003)041<0141:WONSDS>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hatton, C., M. Rivers, E. Emerson, C. Kiernan, D. Reeves, A. Alborz, H. Mason, and L. Mason. 1999. “Staff Characteristics, Working Conditions and Outcomes amongst Staff in Services for People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12 (4), 340-347.10.1111/j.1468-3148.1999.tb00090.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hatton, C., J. Rose and D. Rose. 2004. “Researching Staff.” The International Handbook of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability. E. Emerson, C. Hatton, T. Thompson, and T. Parmenter, eds. Chichester: Wiley, 581-605.10.1002/9780470713198.ch29 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hefetz, A., and M. Warner. 2004. “Privatization and its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14 (2), 171-190.10.1093/jopart/muh012 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hemmings, M. 2011. “‘What Problems You Got?’: Managerialisation and Union Organising in the Voluntary Sector.” Industrial Relations Journal, 42 (5), 473-485.10.1111/j.1468-2338.2011.00636.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hewitt, A., and S. Larson. 2007. “The Direct Support Workforce in Community Supports to Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: Issues, Implications, and Promising Practices.” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13 (2), 178-187.10.1002/mrdd.20151 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hulgin, K. M. and J. O’Brien. 2004. “Person-Centered Services and Organizational Context: Taking Stock of Working Conditions and Their Impact.” Mental Retardation, 42 (3), 169-180.10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<169:PSAOCT>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kastner, T. A., and K. K. Walsh. 2008. “Divided We Stand, United We Fall: Personal Budgets versus Universal Coverage.” Intellectual Developmental Disabilities, 46 (3), 239-242.10.1352/2008.46:239-242 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kessler, I., and S. Bach. 2011. “The Citizen-Consumer as Industrial Relations Actor: New Ways of Working and the End-user in Social Care.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49 (1), 80-102.10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00759.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kochan, T. A., H. C. Katz and R. B. McKersie. 1994. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.10.1177/0160449X10365543 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lakin, K. C., B. Polister, and R. W. Prouty. 2003. “Wages of Non-State Direct-Support Professionals Lag Far Behind Those of Public Direct-Support Professionals and the General Workforce.” Mental Retardation, 41 (2), 141-146.10.1352/0047-6765(2003)041<0141:WONSDS>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lopez, S. H. 2010. “Workers, Managers, and Customers: Triangles of Power in Work Communities.” Work and Occupations, 37 (3), 251-271.10.1177/0730888410375683 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lord, J., and P. Hutchison. 2003. “Individualised Support and Funding: Building Blocks for Capacity Building and Inclusion.” Disability and Society, 18 (1), 71-86.10.1080/713662196 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lord, J., and P. Hutchison. 2007. Pathways to Inclusion: Building a New Story with People and Communities. Concord, Ont.: Captus Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- McCarter, J. 2011. 2011 Annual Report of the Office of the Auditor General of Ontario. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Government of Ontario.10.3138/9781442698031-013 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- MCSS. 2006. Opportunities and Action: Transforming Supports in Ontario for People who Have a Developmental Disability. Toronto: Government of Ontario.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York, N.Y.: Plume.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pedlar, A., and P. Hutchison. 2000. “Restructuring Human Services in Canada: Commodification of Disability.” Disability and Society, 15 (4), 637-651.10.1080/09687590050058224 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pedlar, A., P. Hutchison, S. Arai, and P. Dunn. 2000. “Community Services Landscape in Canada: Survey of Developmental Disability Agencies.” Mental Retardation, 38 (4), 330-341.10.1352/0047-6765(2000)038<0330:CSLICS>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pedlar, A., M. Schneider, and B. Fowke. 2000. “Diverse and Inclusive Communities: Fostering a Textured Life.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 44, 426-426.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Reinders, H. 2008. “The Transformation of Human Services.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52 (7), 564-572.10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01079.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Riddell, S., C. Pearson, D. Jolly, C. Barnes, M. Priestley, and G. Mercer. 2005. “The Development of Direct Payments in the UK: Implications for Social Justice.” Social Policy and Society, 4 (1), 75-85.10.1017/S1474746404002209 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Salamon, L. M., and O. V. Elliott. 2002. The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sanders, L. 2012. “‘You’re Not You’: Caregiver Autonomy and Disability Rights.” Annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association. Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Savas, E. S. 2000. Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sclar, E. 2000. You Don’t Always Get What You Pay For: The Economics of Privatization. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Smith, M., M. Gallagher, H. Wosu, J. Stewart, V. E. Cree, S. Hunter, S. Evans, C. Montgomery, S. Holiday, and H. Wilkinson. 2011. “Engaging with Involuntary Service Users in Social Work: Findings from a Knowledge Exchange Project.” British Journal of Social Work.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sweeney, B., S. McWilliams, and R. Hickey. 2012. “The Centralization of Collective Bargaining in Ontario’s Public Education Sector and the Need to Balance Stakeholder Interests.” Dynamic Negotiation: Teacher Labour Relations in Canadian Elementary and Secondary Education. S. Slinn, and A. Sweetman, eds. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Tarrow, S. G. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 3rd ed. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/bjsw/bcr162 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Test, D. W., C. Flowers, A. Hewitt, and J. Solow. 2003. “Statewide Study of the Direct Support Staff Workforce.” Mental Retardation, 41 (4), 276-285.10.1352/0047-6765(2003)41<276:SSOTDS>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Warner, M., and A. Hefetz. 2002. “Applying Market Solutions to Public Services: An Assessment of Efficiency, Equity, and Voice.” Urban Affairs Review, 38 (1), 70-89.10.1177/107808702401097808 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wilberforce, M., C. Glendinning, D. Challis, J. L. Fernandez, S. Jacobs, K. Jones, M. Knapp, J. Manthorpe, N. Moran, A. Netten, and M. Stevens. 2011. “Implementing Consumer Choice in Long-term Care: The Impact of Individual Budgets on Social Care Providers in England.” Social Policy and Administration, 45 (5), 593-612.10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00788.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
