Abstracts
Résumé
La pédagogie universitaire et le monde du travail sont tous deux influencés par les technologies de l’information. Dans le domaine de la conception de bâtiments durables, ces technologies servent d’objets-frontières, c’est-à-dire d’interfaces qui facilitent les interactions et le partage des connaissances nécessaires au travail multidisciplinaire. Fondé sur les théories de l’apprentissage social et de l’action située ainsi que sur des données probantes issues de plusieurs domaines dont la gestion de projet, l’architecture, l’ingénierie civile, l’ingénierie des systèmes et la conception participative, cet article présente un réseau nomologique illustrant les relations entre des phénomènes individuels et collectifs en jeu au sein d’une équipe de projet et qui déterminent l’apprentissage groupal et la performance d’un projet. Il en résulte un corpus de connaissances utiles aux pédagogues ainsi que six hypothèses vérifiables que les chercheurs peuvent tester.
Mots-clés:
- apprentissage social,
- action située,
- objet-frontière,
- conception intégrée
Abstract
University pedagogy and the world of work are both influenced by information technologies. In the field of design for sustainable construction, these technologies are used as boundary objects, which means as interfaces driving interactions and knowledge sharing required for multidisciplinary work. Based on social learning and situated action theories, and on convincing data coming from multiple domains such as project management, architecture, civil engineering, system engineering, and participatory design, this article presents a nomological network illustrating relationships between individual and collective phenomena in play within a project team, and which determine group learning and project performance. This results into a useful body of knowledge for teachers and six verifiable hypotheses that researchers can test.
Keywords:
- social learning,
- situated action,
- boundary object,
- integrated design
Download the article in PDF to read it. Download
Appendices
Note des auteurs
Les auteurs aimeraient remercier les réviseurs anonymes et Hugues Rivard pour leurs commentaires lors de la préparation de cet article.
Références
- Association française de normalisation. (1990). Vocabulaire de l’analyse de la valeur et de l’analyse fonctionnelle. Paris : La Défense.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J. et McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004.10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Belout, A. (1997). Effects of human resource management on project effectiveness and success: Toward a new conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 16, 21-26.10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00011-2 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Besner, C. et Hobbs, B. (2006). The perceived value and potential contribution of project management practices to project success. Project Management Journal, 37, 37-48.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Besner, C. et Hobbs, B. (2008). Project management practice, generic or contextual: A reality check. Project Management Journal, 39, 16-33.10.1002/pmj.20033 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Blackler, F., Crump, N. et McDonald, S. (1999). Managing experts and competing through innovation: An activity theoretical analysis. Organization, 6, 5-31.10.1177/135050849961001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Blackler, F., Crump, N. et McDonald, S. (2000). Organizing processes in complex activity networks. Organization, 7, 277-300.10.1177/135050840072005 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13, 442-455.10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15, 555-568.10.1287/orsc.1040.0094 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Chiocchio, F. (2007). Project team performance: A study of electronic task and coordination communication. Project Management Journal, 38, 97-109.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Chiocchio, F. et Essiembre, H. (2007, avril). Does cohesion correlate with performance in project teams? An exploratory meta-analysis. Affiche scientifique présentée à la 22nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Chiocchio, F. et Essiembre, H. (sous presse). Cohesion and performance: A Meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams, production teams, and service teams. Small Group Research.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Chiocchio, F. et Lafrenière, A. (sous presse). A project management perspective on student’s declarative commitments to goals established within asynchronous communication. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cohen, S. G. et Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.10.1177/014920639702300303 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cronbach, L. J. et Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.10.1037/h0040957 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A. et al. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21, 333-352.10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Deforge, Y. (1986). Technologie et génétique de l’objet industriel. Paris: Maloine.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Department of Health. (2008, janvier). Achieving excellence design evaluation toolkit. Récupéré le 30 mars 2009 du site du Department of Health du Royaume-Uni, section Publications and statistics – Publications : http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_082089Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Dinsmore, P. C. et Cabanis-Brewin, J. (2006). The AMA handbook of project management. New York : AMACOM.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Druskat, V. U. et Kayes, D. C. (2000). Learning versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, 31, 328-353.10.1177/104649640003100304 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Druskat, V. U. et Pescosolido, A. (2002). The content of effective teamwork mental models in self-managing teams: Ownership, learning and heedful interrelating. Human Relations, 55, 283-314.10.1177/0018726702553001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Dunn, D. S., McCarthy, M. A., Baker, S., Halonen, J. S. et Hill, G. W., IV. (2007). Quality benchmarks in undergraduate psychology programs. American Psychologist, 62, 650-670.10.1037/0003-066X.62.7.650 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Earley, P. C. et Gibson, C. B. (2002). Multinational work teams. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-385.10.2307/2666999 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Managing the risk of learning. Dans M. A. West, D. Tjosvold et K. G. Smith (dir.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (p. 255-275). West Sussex, Royaume-Uni : Wiley.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Edwards, R. (2005, février). Learning in context – within and across domains. Communication présentée au Economic & Social Research Council [ESRC] Teaching and Learning Research Thematic Seminar Series, Seminar 1: Contexts, Communities, Networks: Mobilising Learners’ Resources and Relationships in Different Domains, Glasgow, Royaume-Uni.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. et Blackler, F. H. M. (2005). On the life of the object. Organization, 12, 307-330.10.1177/1350508405051268 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. et Karkkainen, T. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319-336.10.1016/0959-4752(95)00021-6 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J. et Poikela, R. (1996). Change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1, 10-17.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Evans, C. R. et Jarvis, P. A. (1980). Group cohesion: A review and re-evaluation. Small Group Behavior, 11, 359-370.10.1177/104649648001100401 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Forgues, D. (2008). Using boundary objects to generate better value in the construction industry. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université de Salford, Royaume-Uni.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fruchter, R. (1999). A/E/C teamwork: A collaborative design and learning space. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 13, 261-269.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:4(261) Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Towards a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.10.2307/256496 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gouran, D. C., Brown, D. et Henry, C. (1978). Behavioral correlates of perception of quality in decision making discussions. Communication Monographs, 45, 51-63.10.1080/03637757809375951 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Green, S. D. (1996). Smart value management: A group decision support methodology for building design. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université de Reading, Royaume-Uni.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hackman, R. J. (1976). Group influence on individuals. Dans M. D. Dunnette (dir.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (p. 1455-1525). Chicago : Rand-McNally.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hackman, R. J. (1987). The design of work teams. Dans J. W. Lorsch (dir.), Handbook of organizational behavior (p. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hackman, R. J. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hardy, C. et Clegg, S. R. (1996). Some dare call it power. Dans C. Hardy et S. R. Clegg (dir.), Handbook of organization studies (p. 622-641). Londres : Sage.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P. et Weil, B. (2002). De la gestion des connaissances aux organisations orientées conception. Revue internationale des sciences sociales, 171, 29-42.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink. Boston, MA : Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jay, G. M. et Willis, S. L. (1992). Influence of direct computer experience on older adults’ attidudes towards computers. Journal of Gerontology, 47, 250-257.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J. et Evbuomwan, N. F. O. (2000). Establishing and processing client requirements – A key aspect of concurrent engineering in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7, 15-28.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J. et Evbuornwan, N. F. O. (2002). Capturing client requirements in construction projects. Cornwall, Royaume-Uni : Thomas Telford.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kaptelinin, V. et Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Boston : MIT Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kear, K. (2004). Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education. Open Learning, 19, 151-164.10.1080/0268051042000224752 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Keller, R. T. (1986). Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 715-726.10.2307/255941 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kernan, M. C. et Howard, G. S. (1990). Computer anxiety and computer attitudes: An investigation of construct and predictive validity issues. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 681-690.10.1177/0013164490503026 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Koskela, L. (2000). An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction (VTT Publications 408). Espoo, Finlande : Technical Research Center of Finland.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Koskela, L. et Howell, G. (2008). The underlying theory of project management is obsolete. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36, 22-34.10.1109/EMR.2008.4534317 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Koskinen, K. U. (2004). Knowledge management to improve project communication and implementation. Project Management Journal, 35, 13-19.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Koskinen, K. U. et Mäkinen, S. (2009). Role of boundary objects in negotiations of project contracts. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 31-38.10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.006 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kostof, S. (1986). The architect. New York : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lambert, L. R. (2006). R&D project management: Adapting to technological risk and uncertainty. Dans P. C. Dinsmore et J. Cabanis-Brewin (dir.), The AMA handbook of project management (p. 458-468). New York : AMACOM.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Larsson, N. (2002). The integrated design process. Report on a national workshop. Ottawa, Canada : Natural Resources Canada.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. Oxford, Royaume-Uni : Architectural Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Watertown, MA : Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lepine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E. et Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273-307.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Löhnert, G., Dalkowski, A. et Sutter, W. (2003). Integrated design process: A guideline for sustainable and solar-optimised building design (version 1.1). Berlin, Allemagne / Zug, Suisse : International Energy Agency.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lynn, G. S. et Reilly, R. R. (2000). Measuring team performance. Research Technology Management, 43, 48-56.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- MacCoun, R. J. (1996). Sexual orientation and military cohesion: A critical review of the evidence. Dans G. Herek, J. Jobe et R. E. Carney (dir.), Out in Force – Sexual orientation and the military (p. 157-176). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Markham, T., Larmer, J. et Ravitz, J. (2003). Handbook of project based learning (2e éd.). Novato, CA : Buck Institute for Education.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- McPherson, M. A. et Nunes, J. B. (2008). Critical issues for e-learning delivery: What may seem obvious is not always put into practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 1-13.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00281.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Morgeson, F. P. et Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249-265.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mullen, B. et Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Niiniluoto, I. (1993). The aim and structure of applied research. Erkenntnis, 38, 1-21.10.1007/BF01129020 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Olson, G. M., Teasley, S., Bietz, M. J. et Cogburn, D. L. (2002). Collaboratories to support distributed science: The example of international HIV/AIDS research. ACM International Conference Series, 30, 44-51.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pinto, J. K. et Trailer, J. W. (1999). Essentials of project control. Newtown Square, PA : Project Management Institute.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Project Management Institute [PMI]. (2002). Project manager competency development framework. Newtown Square, PA : auteur.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Project Management Institute [PMI]. (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (3e éd.). Newtown Square, PA : auteur.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ratté, S. et Caron, J. (2004). Le Web pour enseigner par projets et favoriser la collaboration. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 1(2), 27-34.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Rizzuto, T. E. et Reeves, J. (2007). A multidisciplinary meta-analysis of human barriers to technology implementation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 59, 226-240.10.1037/1065-9293.59.3.226 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, L. C. (1991). Update on National Science Foundation funding of the “Collaboratory.” Communications of the ACM, 34, 83.10.1145/125319.125392 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Salazar, A. J. (1997). Communication effects on small group decision-making: Homogeneity and task as moderators of the communication-performance relationship. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 35-65.10.1080/10570319709374561 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sense, A. J. (2003). Learning generators: Project teams re-conceptualized. Project Management Journal, 34, 4-12.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3e éd.). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Springer, L., Stanne, M. E. et Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21-51.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Star, S. L. et Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-1939. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.10.1177/030631289019003001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29-54.10.1177/0149206305277792 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sundstrom, E., McIntyre, M., Halfhill, T. et Richards, H. (2000). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics, 4, 44-67.10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.44 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Villeneuve, M. (1997). Vérification de la relation entre les différentes dimensions de la cohésion et la performance des équipes de travail. Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université de Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Vinck, D. et Laureillard, P. (1995, décembre). Coordination par les objets dans les processus de conception. Communication présentée aux Journées CSI [Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation] : Représenter, Attribuer, Coordonner, Paris, France.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Weick, K. E. et Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.10.2307/2393372 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. M., Goodman, P. S. et Cronin, M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1041-1059.10.5465/AMR.2007.26585724 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Zager, D. (2002). Collaboration as an activity. Coordinating with pseudo-collective objects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 181-204.10.1023/A:1015233730413 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar