Abstracts
Résumé
Les principaux défis des MOOCs se résument souvent au faible taux de réussite (voir Breslow et al., 2013; Gillani, 2013; Karsenti, 2013), aux questions de propriété intellectuelle des contenus de cours (voir EDUCAUSE, 2012; Fowler et Smith, 2013; Porter, 2013) et aux mécanismes de l’évaluation certificative (voir Cisel et Bruillard, 2012; Liss, 2013; Yuan et Powell, 2013). Dans le cadre de ce texte, nous nous intéressons tout particulièrement aux mesures de soutien au processus d’apprentissage (voir Karsenti, 2013; Kop, 2011; Kop, Fournier et Mak, 2011; Tschofen et Mackness, 2012), et tout particulièrement aux stratégies pouvant être mises en place pour favoriser la motivation des apprenants (voir Kizilcec et Schneider, 2015) et, ainsi, la poursuite du parcours des apprenants inscrits dans les MOOCs. À partir de la théorie de l’autodétermination de Ryan et Deci (2000), nous explorons comment les trois tendances caractéristiques retrouvées actuellement dans certaines formations à distance (l’apprentissage nomade, la ludification des activités d’apprentissage et l’apprentissage adaptatif) sont susceptibles d’accroître la motivation des apprenants qui participent à des MOOCs.
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Acosta, E. S., Escribano Otero, J. J. et Valderrama, F. (2014). Motivation in massive education online : Development and testing of a system of accreditation badges for MOOC. Digital Education Review, 25(1), 18-35. Récupéré de http://revistes.ub.edu
- Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H. et Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance : The role of openness and reputation. Computers and Education, 80, 28-38. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006
- Ames, C., & Ames, R., (Eds.), (1989). Motivation in Education. San Diego: Academic Press.
- Bowman, N. K. (2015, 17 mars). Investigating the impact of a gamified unit of instruction on student motivation and learning. Communication présentée à la 20th Annual Technology, Colleges, and Community Worldwide Online Conference, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. Récupéré de l’archive ScholarSpace : http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu
- Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D. et Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom : Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13-25. Récupéré de http://rpajournal.com
- Buckley, P. et Doyle, E. (2014). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.964263
- Bulger, M., Bright, J. et Cobo, C. (2015). The real component of virtual learning: motivations for face-to-face MOOC meetings in developing and industrialised countries. Information Communication and Society, 18(10), 1200-1216. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1061571
- Chang, R. I., Hung, H. S. et Lin, C. F. (2015). Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 528-541. doi:10.1111/bjet.12275
- Cisel, M. et Bruillard, E. (2012). Chronique des MOOC. Revue des Sciences et technologies de l’information et de la communication pour l’éducation et la formation, 19. Récupéré de : http://sticef.univ-lemans.fr
- De Freitas, S. I., Morgan, J. et Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 455-471. doi:10.1111/bjet.12268
- Deci, E.L. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.
- Deci, E. L. et Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY : Plenum.
- Deci, E. L. et Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self : Integration in personality. Dans R. A. Dientsbier (dir.), Perspectives on Motivation : Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, NE : University of Nebraska Press.
- Deci, E. L. et Ryan, R. M. (2008). Favoriser la motivation optimale et la santé mentale dans les divers milieux de vie. Psychologie canadienne, 49(1), 24-34. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.24 Récupéré de http://www.researchgate.net
- Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. et Guay, F. (2013). Self-determination theory and actualization of human potential. Dans D. McInerney, R. Craven, H. Marsh et F. Guay (dir.), Theory driving research : New wave perspectives on self-processes and human development (p. 109-133). Charlotte, NC : Information Age Press.
- EDUCAUSE. (2012). What campus leaders need to know about MOOCs. Récupéré de http://educause.edu
- Erenli, K. (2013). The impact of gamification. Recommending education scenarios. International Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 15-21. doi:10.3991/ijet.v8is1.2320 Récupéré de http://www.editlib.org
- Fernandes, J., Duarte, D., Ribeiro, C., Farinha, C., Pereira, J. M. et Silva, M. M. (2012). iThink : a game-based approach towards improving collaboration and participation in requirement elicitation. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 66-77. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.059
- Fowler, L. et Smith, K. (2013). Drawing the blueprint as we build : Setting up a library-based copyright and permissions service for MOOCs. D-Lib Magazine, 19(7-8). doi:10.1045/july2013-fowler
- Gaffield, C. (2012). History of education. Récupéré de http://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/
- García Espinosa, B. J., Tenorio Sepúlveda, G. C. et Ramírez Montoya, M. S. (2015). Self-motivation challenges for student involvement in the open educational movement with MOOC. RUSC Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 91-103. doi:10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2185
- Gillani, N. (2013). Learner communications in massively open online courses (OxCHEPS Occasional Paper No. 53). Récupéré de http://docplayer.net
- Goldberg, L. R., Bell, E., King, C., O’Mara, C., McInerney, F., Robinson, A. et Vickers, J. (2015). Relationship between participants’ level of education and engagement in their completion of the Understanding dementia massive open online course. BMC Medical Education, 15(60). doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0344-z
- Gray, C. (2015). Exploring measures of engagement in open online work based learning: Towards better measures of success in open online learning methods, massive or otherwise. International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 22(3), 41-50.
- Greene, J. A., Oswald, C. A. et Pomerantz, J. (2015). Predictors of retention and achievement in a massive open online course. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 925-955. doi:10.3102/0002831215584621
- Grund, C. K. (2015). How games and game elements facilitate learning and motivation : A literature review. Dans Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) – Proceedings, Volume P-246 (p. 1279-1293).
- Hew, K. F. et Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs) : Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
- Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J. et Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1). doi:10.2139/ssrn.2381263
- Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited : Assessment, length and attrition. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(3), 341-358. Récupéré de http://www.irrodl.org/
- Kankanhalli, A., Taher, M., Cavusoglu, H. et Kim, S. H. (2012). Gamification : A new paradigm for online user engagement. Dans M.-H. Huang, G. Piccoli et V. Sambamurthy (dir.), Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Shanghai.
- Karsenti, T. (2013). The MOOC : What the research says. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education, 10(2), 23-37. Récupéré de http://www.ritpu.org/?lang=en
- Karsenti, T. (2015a). MOOC : La pédagogie universitaire face aux MOOC. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire (RITPU), 12(1), 1-12.
- Karsenti, T. (2015b). MOOC : faits et chiffres. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire (RITPU), 12(1), 112-122.
- Kizilcec, R. F. et Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learners : Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(2), 54-69. doi:10.1145/2699735 Récupéré du site de René F. Kizilcec : http://rene.kizilcec.com
- Konnikova, M. (2014, 7 novembre). Will MOOCs be flukes? The New Yorker. Récupéré de http://www.newyorker.com
- Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks : Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 19-38. Récupéré du site de la revue : http://www.irrodl.org
- Kop, R., Fournier, H. et Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-93. Récupéré du site de la revue : http://www.irrodl.org
- Li, Z., Huang, K.-W. et Cavusoglu, H. (2012). Quantifying the impact of badges on user engagement in online Q&A communities. Dans M.-H. Huang, G. Piccoli et V. Sambamurthy (dir.), Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Shanghai.
- Liss, J. M. (2013). Creative destruction and globalization : The rise of massive standardized education platforms. Globalizations, 10(4), 557-570. doi:10.1080/14747731.2013.806741
- Liu, D., Li, X. et Santhanam, R. (2013). Digital games and beyond : What happens when players compete. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 111-124. Récupéré de http://www.researchgate.net
- Manning, J. et Sanders, M. (2013, 18 juillet). How widely used are MOOC forums? A first look [billet de blogue]. Récupéré le 22 août 2013 du blogue Signal : thoughts on online learning : https://stanford.edu/dept/vpol/cgi-bin/wordpress
- Mutter, T. et Kundisch, D. (2014). Behavioral mechanisms prompted by badges : The goal-gradient hypothesis. Dans M. Myers et D. Straub (dir.), Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Auckland.
- Pappano, L. (2012, 2 novembre). The year of the MOOC. New York Times, ED26. Récupéré de http://nytimes.com
- Porter, J. E. (2013). MOOCs, «courses,» and the question of faculty and student copyrights. Dans C. Ratliff (dir.), The CCCC-IP Annual : Top intellectual property developments of 2012 (p. 2-18). Récupéré du site du CCCC : http://ncte.org/cccc
- Ryan, R. M. et Deci, E. L., (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Récupéré de http://selfdeterminationtheory.org
- Scheiner, C. W. (2015). The motivational fabric of gamified idea competitions: The evaluation of game mechanics from a longitudinal perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 341-352. doi:10.1111/caim.12115 Récupéré du site de Social Science Research Network : http://papers.ssrn.com/
- Scheiner, C. W. et Witt, M. (2013). The backbone of gamification – A theoretical consideration of play and game mechanics. Dans M. Horbach (dir.), Informatik 2013. Ges. für Informatik, Bonn (p. 2372-2386). Récupéré de http://subs.emis.de/LNI
- Teh, N., Schuff, D., Johnson, S. et Geddes, D. (2013). Can work be fun? Improving task motivation and help-seeking through game mechanics. Dans R. Baskerville et M. Chau (dir.), Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Milan.
- Tschofen, C. et Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 124-143. Récupéré de http://www.irrodl.org
- Vallerand, R.J., Blais, M., Brière, N., & Pelletier, L. (1989). Construction et validation de l’Échelle de Motivation en Éducation. Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 21: 323-349.
- Weissmann, J. (2012, 18 juillet). The single most important experiment in higher education. The Atlantic. Récupéré de http://theatlantic.com
- Wiegand, T. et Stieglitz, S. (2014) Serious fun-effects of gamification on knowledge exchange in enterprises. Dans E. Plödereder (dir.), Informatik 2014. Köllen, Bonn (p. 321-332). Récupéré de http://cs.emis.de/LNI
- Xiong, Y., Li, H., Kornhaber, M. L., Suen, H. K., Pursel, B. et Goins, D. D. (2015). Examining the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC : A structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2(3), 23-33. Récupéré de http://ger.mercy.edu/index.php/ger
- Yeager, C., Hurley-Dasgupta, B. et Bliss, C. A. (2013). cMOOCs and global learning : An authentic alternative. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(2), 133-147. Récupéré de http://eric.ed.gov/
- Yuan, L. et Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education : Implications for higher education. Récupéré du site du Centre for Educational Technology, Interoperability and Standards : http://publications.cetis.ac.uk