Abstracts
Résumé
Cette étude aborde l’apprentissage autonome virtuel des étudiants en situation de confinement au Cameroun et poursuivant les cours à travers un environnement éducatif numérique peu structuré. Ceux-ci manifestent un engouement pour l’apprentissage en ligne de manière autonome et ont besoin d’une pédagogie adaptée aux exigences de la formation au moyen du numérique éducatif. L’impératif en cela consiste à structurer l’environnement éducatif virtuel de manière à favoriser une interactivité entre enseignants et étudiants et des contenus d’apprentissage compris et utilisés par tous. La réflexion suggère l’adaptation et la validation, en contexte d’environnement virtuel peu structuré, d’une échelle de mesure de l’apprentissage autonome des étudiants.
Mots-clés :
- Apprentissage autonome,
- virtuel,
- confinement,
- étudiants,
- Cameroun
Abstract
This study concerns the virtual autonomous learning of students experiencing a lockdown in Cameroon and continuing the courses online through a poorly structured digital educational environment. Students are keen to learn online independently and need a pedagogy adapted to the requirements of learning via digital education. The imperative here is to structure the virtual educational environment in such a way as to promote interactivity between teachers, students and learning content understood and used by all. The work suggests the adaptation and validation, in the context of a poorly structured virtual environment, of a students’ autonomous learning measuring scale.
Keywords:
- Autonomous learning,
- virtual,
- confinement,
- university students,
- Cameroon
Appendices
Références
- Anderson, W. (2013). Independent learning: Autonomy, control, and meta-cognition. Dans M. G. Moore (dir.), Handbook of distance education (p. 104‑121). Routledge.
- Ayan, E. (2015). Moodle as builder of motivation and autonomy in English courses. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5(1), 6‑20. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2015.51002
- Beluce, A. C. et de Oliveira, K. L. (2015). Students’ motivation for learning in virtual learning environments. Paidéia, 25(60), 105‑113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272560201513
- Beluce, A. C. et de Oliveira, K. L. (2016). Scale of strategies and motivation for learning in virtual environments. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 21(66), 593‑610. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782016216631
- Borras-Gene, O., Martiñez-Nuñez, M. et Fidalgo-Blanco, Á. (2016). New challenges for the motivation and learning in engineering education using gamification in MOOC. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1B), 501‑512.
- Bri, D., García, M., Coll, H. et Lloret, J. (2009). A study of virtual learning environments. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 6(1), 33‑43. http://wseas.us/...
- Broadbent, J. et Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1‑13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
- Cejudo, M. L. (2013). Assessing personal learning environments (PLEs). An expert evaluation. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 2(1), 39‑44. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2.1.39-44
- Chourishi, D., Chanchal, K. B., Chaurasia, A. et Soni, A. (2011). Effective e-learning through Moodle. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Research, 1(1), article 4. http://ijater.com/...
- Deci, E. L. et Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 11(4), 227‑268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
- Deci, E. L. et Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27(1), 23‑40.
- Deimann, M. et Bastiaens, T. (2010). The role of volition in distance education: An exploration of its capacities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 1‑16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.778
- Dochy, F., De Rijdt, C. et Dyck, W. (2002). Cognitive prerequisites and learning: How far have we progressed since Bloom? Implications for educational practice and teaching. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 265‑284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787402003003006
- Eccles, J. S. et Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109‑132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
- Elvers, G. C., Polzella, D. J. et Graetz, K. (2003). Procrastination in online courses: Performance and attitudinal differences. Teaching of Psychology, 30(2), 159‑162. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP3002_13
- Filcher, C. et Miller, G. (2000). Learning strategies for distance education students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 41(1), 60‑68. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2000.01060
- Fuchs, C. et Horak, E. (2008). Africa and the digital divide. Telematics and informatics, 25(2), 99‑116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2006.06.004
- Gortan, A. et Jereb, E. (2007). The dropout rate from e-learning courses and the satisfaction of students with e-learning. Organizacija, 40(6), 248‑257. http://organizacija.fov.uni‑mb.si/...
- Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19‑42. http://ncolr.org/issues/jiol/...
- Hartnett, M., St. George, A. et Dron, J. (2011). Being together: Factors that unintentionally undermine motivation. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 15(1), 1‑16. http://jofdl.nz/...
- Hew, K. F. et Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussion: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1111‑1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.002
- Hubackova, S., Semradova, I. et Klimova, B. F. (2011). Blended learning in a foreign language teaching. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 281‑285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.054
- Jaligama, V. et Liarokapis, F. (2011, mai). An online virtual learning environment for higher education. Dans Proceedings of Third International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (p. 207‑214). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VS‑GAMES.2011.44
- Jeremić, Z., Jovanović, J. et Gašević, D. (2013). Personal learning environments on the social semantic Web. Semantic Web, 4(1), 23‑51. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-2012-0058
- Kaplan, A. M. et Haenlein, M. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons, 59(4), 441‑450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008
- Khanal, P. (2014). Making virtual learning interactive and meaningful: Implications of constructivism for adult students. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 3(1), 91‑102. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2013.302
- Kim, J. (2013). Influence of group size on students’ participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 62, 123‑129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.025
- Kim, Y. H. (2014). Learning motivations, academic self-efficacy, and problem solving processes after practice education evaluation. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 15(10), 6176‑6186. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.10.6176
- Kim, P., Hong, J., Bonk, C. et Lim, G. (2011). Effects of group reflection variations in project-based learning integrated in a Web 2.0 learning space. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 333‑349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820903210782
- Kozma, R., McGhee, R., Quellmalz, E. et Zalles, D. (2004). Closing the digital divide: Evaluation of the World Links program. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(4), 361‑381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2003.11.014
- Legault, L., Green-Demers, I. et Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567‑582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567
- Lehmann, D. R. et Hulbert, J. (1972). Are three-point scales always good enough? Journal of Marketing Research, 9(4), 444‑446. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377200900416
- Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur (2018). Arrêté no 18/00035/MINESUP/SG/DDES/DAJ du 28 janvier 2018 portant organisation du système licence, master, doctorat/PhD (LMD) dans l’enseignement supérieur au Cameroun. Gouvernement du Cameroun. http://camexamen.com/...
- Mitchell, A. (2014). Online courses and online teaching strategies in higher education. Creative Education, 5(23), 2017‑2019. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.523225
- Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C. et Galyen, K. (2011). E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129‑135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
- Murray, M., Pérez, J., Geist, D., Hedrick, A. et Steinbach, T. (2012). Student interaction with online course content: Build it and they might come. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 125‑140. https://doi.org/10.28945/1592
- Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385‑407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
- Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S. et Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734‑746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‑0663.99.4.734
- Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S. et Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147‑169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
- Stiller, K. D. et Bachmaier, R. (2017). Dropout in an online training for trainee teachers. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 20(1), 80‑95. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0005
- Tsai, M. J. (2009). The model of strategic e-learning: Understanding and evaluating student e‑learning from metacognitive perspectives. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 34‑48. http://j-ets.net/...
- Xie, K., Durrington, V. et Yen, L. L. (2011). Relationship between students’ motivation and their participation in asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 17‑29. http://jolt.merlot.org/...
- Youngju, L., Jaeho, C. et Taehyun, K. (2013). Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 328‑337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01306.x