Abstracts
Résumé
Il y a un intérêt croissant pour l’utilisation d’indicateurs de bien-être subjectif pour le monitorage au niveau des populations et pour l’évaluation des politiques sociales. Les indicateurs collectifs de bien-être subjectif fournissent des informations sur la qualité de vie qui complètent d’autres indicateurs sociaux et économiques. Des recherches récentes mettent l’accent sur les conditions sociales qui contribuent au bien-être. Que disent les recherches sur une approche-population pour la promotion du bien-être? Une telle approche est-elle pertinente pour les psychologues? Cet article vise à donner un aperçu non exhaustif de la littérature qui traite des indicateurs de bien-être subjectif et de leurs implications possibles pour les politiques sociales et les interventions au sein de la population.
Mots-clés :
- bien-être subjectif,
- bonheur,
- approche-population,
- indicateurs sociaux,
- politiques sociales
Abstract
There is growing interest in using indicators of subjective well-being for population-level monitoring and policy evaluation. Subjective well-being indicators provide information about quality of life that is complementary to other social and economic indicators. Recent research has focused attention on the positive institutions and social conditions that contribute to subjective well-being. What does this research tell us about a population-level approach to promoting well-being? What roles can psychologists play in population-level approaches to well- being? The objective of this article is to give a selective overview of research on subjective well-being indicators and their implications for social policy and population-level interventions.
Keywords:
- subjective well-being,
- happiness,
- population-level interventions,
- social indicators,
- social policy
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Barry, M. M. (2009). Addressing the determinants of positive mental health: Concepts, evidence and practice. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 11(3), 4-17.
- Beddington, J., Cooper, C. L., Field, J., Goswami, U., Huppert, F. A., Jenkins, R., … Thomas, S. M. (2008). The mental wealth of nations. Nature, 455(7216), 1057-1060.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. et Crouter, A. C. (1983). Evolution of environmental models in developmental research. Dans P. H. Mussen et L. Carmichael (dir.), Handbook of child psychology (p. 357-414). Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons.
- Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., van Vugt, J. et Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 159-190.
- De Neve, J.-E., Diener, E., Tay, L. et Xuereb, C. (2013). The objective benefits of subjective well-being. Dans J. Helliwell, R. Layard et J. Sachs (dir.), World happiness report (p. 54-79). New York, NY: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
- De Prycker, V. (2010). Happiness on the political agenda? PROS and CONS. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(5), 585-603.
- Deneulin, S. et McGregor, J. A. (2010). The capability approach and the politics of a social conception of wellbeing. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(4), 501-519.
- Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.
- Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151-157.
- Diener, E., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L. D. et Oishi, S. (2016). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne. Doi: 10.1037/cap0000063
- Diener, E., Kesebir, P. et Lucas, R. (2008). Benefits of accounts of well-being— For societies and for psychological science. Applied Psychology, 57(1), 37-53.
- Diener, E., Oishi, S. et Lucas, R. E. (2015). National accounts of subjective well-being. American Psychologist, 70(3), 234-242.
- Diener, E. et Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1-31.
- Diener, E. et Tay, L. (2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 135-149.
- Frey, B. S. et Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(466), 918-938.
- Frey, B. S. et Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402-435.
- Huppert, F. A., Marks, N., Clark, A., Siegrist, J., Stutzer, A., Vittersø, J. et Wahrendorf, M. (2009). Measuring well-being across Europe: Description of the ESS well-being module and preliminary findings. Social Indicators Research, 91(3), 301-315.
- Huppert, F. A. et So, T. T. C. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837-861.
- Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62(2), 95-108.
- Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D. et Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022.
- Lavoie, F. et Brunson, L. (2010). La pratique de la psychologie communautaire. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 51(2), 96-105.
- Layard, R. (2012). Mental health: The new frontier for the welfare state. London, UK : London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Economic Performance. Repéré à http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47418/
- Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. et Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855.
- Marmot, M. (2007). Achieving health equity: From root causes to fair outcomes. The Lancet, 370(9593), 1153-1163.
- Nelson, G. et Prilleltensky, I. (2010). Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Oishi, S. et Diener, E. (2014). Can and should happiness be a policy goal? Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 195-203.
- Ryan, R. M. et Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141-166.
- Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
- Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford, UK : Oxford Paperbacks.
- Sin, N. L. et Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467-487.