Abstracts
Résumé
La discipline historique, possiblement plus que les autres sciences humaines, a eu un rapport difficile avec le défi postmoderne. Après un bref tour d’horizon nécessairement schématique des réflexions sur l’impact du postmodernisme sur la discipline historique, ce texte se penche sur un problème rarement soulevé en philosophie de l’histoire que le postmodernisme est venu poser avec une nouvelle acuité, celui du rapport non pas pratique, mais théorico-discursif que les historiens entretiennent avec leur savoir : l’exercice épistémologique. Nous soutenons que si les historiens ont longtemps valorisé l’absence de cet exercice au sein de leur discipline, le défi postmoderne a amené plusieurs d’entre eux à déplorer cette absence. C’est le rapport même des historiens à l’épistémologie qui se serait infléchi sous l’impulsion du postmodernisme. Au-delà de cette inflexion discursive majeure, nous concluons qu’il serait pertinent de s’interroger davantage sur les fonctions et les fins de l’exercice épistémologique au sein de la discipline historique, interrogation qui oblige à penser à nouveaux frais la vieille et épineuse question de la relation difficile entre histoire et philosophie.
Mots-clés :
- Postmodernisme,
- discipline historique,
- épistémologie,
- historiens,
- philosophie de l’histoire
Abstract
The discipline of history, probably more than the other disciplines in the humanities, has had to struggle with the postmodern challenge. After a necessarily short and simplified overview of the various thoughts on the impact postmodernism has had upon the historical discipline, this paper addresses a problem rarely raised in the philosophy of history, but which has been set out with a renewed acuteness by postmodernism: not the practical, but the theoretical and discursive relation historians have with their own knowledge, i.e. the epistemological exercise. I argue that while, for a long time, historians have applauded the epistemological exercise’s absence in their discipline, the postmodern challenge has led many of them to object to it. It is indeed the way historians relate to epistemology that has been deflected under the impulse of postmodernism. Beyond this major discursive deflection, I conclude that it would be relevant to reflect further on the purposes and the ends of the epistemology within the historical discipline. This reflection, in turn, invites us to rethink the old and thorny question of the fraught relationship between history and philosophy.
Keywords:
- Postmodernism,
- historical discipline,
- epistemology,
- historians,
- philosophy of history
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Ankersmit, F. R. (1989). Historiography and Postmodernism. History and Theory. 28.137-153.
- Ankersmit, F. R. (1998). Hayden White’s Appeal to the Historians. History and Theory. 37.182-193.
- Ankersmit, F. R. et Kellner, H. (dir.) (1995). A New Philosophy of History. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
- Appleby, J., Hunt, L. et Jacob, M. (1994). Telling the Truth about History. New York : Norton.
- Aron, R. (1969). La philosophie critique de l’histoire. Essai sur une théorie allemande de l’histoire. Paris : Vrin.
- Bailyn, B. (1963). The Problems of the Working Historian: A Comment. In Hook, S. (dir.). Philosophy and History: a Symposium. New York : New York University Press. 92-101.
- Barthes, R. (1967). Le discours de l’histoire. Social Science Information. 6.65-75.
- Bentley, M. (1999). Modern Historiography. Londres : Routledge.
- Berkhofer, R. F. (1997). Beyond the Great Story: History as Text and Discourse. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
- Bermejo Barrera, J. C. (2001). Making History, Talking about History. History and Theory. 40.190-205.
- Bondì, D. (dir.) (2011). What Philosophers of History Can Do with the Self-Images of the Historical Discipline. Storia della Storiografia. 59-60.150-223.
- Bourdieu, P. (1995). Sur les rapports entre la sociologie et l’histoire en Allemagne et en France. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. 106-107.108-122.
- Bourdieu, P. (2001). Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris : Raisons d’agir.
- Bourdieu, P. (2003). Méditations pascaliennes. Paris : Seuil.
- Breisach, E. (2003). On the Future of History: The Postmodern Challenge and its Aftermath. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
- Burke, P. (2002). Historiography and Philosophy of History. In Burke, P. (dir.). History and Historians in the 20th Century. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 230-250.
- Chartier, R. (1993). Quatre questions à Hayden White. Storia della Storiografia. 24.133-142.
- Chaunu, P. (1978). Histoire quantitative, histoire sérielle. Paris : EHESS-Armand Colin.
- Clark, E. (2004). History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
- Clark, G. K. (1969). Guide for Research Students Working on Historical Subjects. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- Collingwood. R. G. (1956). The Idea of History. New York : Oxford University Press.
- Daddow, O. J. (2004). The Ideology of Apathy: Historians and Postmodernism. Rethinking History. 8.417-437.
- Daddow, O. J. (2005). Still no Philosophy Please, We’re Historians. Rethinking History. 9.491-494.
- Danto, A. (1965). Analytical Philosophy of History. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
- Deeds Ermarth, E. (2004). Ethics and Method. History and Theory. 43. 61-83.
- Delacroix, C. (dir.) (2004). La dure simplicité du positif. EspacesTemps. 84-86.3-4.
- Delacroix, C. (2005). De quelques usages historiens de Paul Ricoeur. In Müller, B. (dir.). L’Histoire entre mémoire et épistémologie. Autour de Paul Ricoeur. Lausanne : Payot. 100-123.
- Delacroix, C. (2010a). Linguistic Turn. In Delacroix, C., Dosse, R., Garcia, P. et Offenstadt, N. (dir.). Historiographies I. Concepts et débats. Paris : Gallimard. 476-490.
- Delacroix, C. (2010b). L’écriture de l’histoire. In Delacroix, C., Dosse, R., Garcia, P. et Offenstadt, N. (dir.). Historiographies II. Concepts et débats. Paris : Gallimard. 731-743.
- Delacroix, C., Dosse, F., Garcia, P. et Offenstadt, N. (dir.) (2010a). Historiographies I. Concepts et débats. Paris : Gallimard.
- Delacroix, C., Dosse, F., Garcia, P. et Offenstadt, N. (dir.) (2010b). Historigraphies II. Concepts et débats. Paris : Gallimard.
- Domanska. E. (dir.) (1998). Encounters: Philosophy of History after Postmodernism. Charlottesville : University of Virginia Press.
- Dray, W. (1957). Laws and Explanation in History. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- Elton, G. (1969). The Practice of History. Londres : Collins.
- Elton, G. (1991). Return to Essentials: Some Reflections on the Present State of Historical Study. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- Evans, R. (1999). In Defense of History. Londres : Norton.
- Febvre, L. (1953). Combats pour l’histoire. Paris : Armand Colin.
- Fulbrook, M. (2002). Historical Theory. Londres : Routledge.
- Gagnon, N. et Hamelin, J. (1979). L’homme historien : introduction à la méthodologie de l’histoire. St-Hyacinthe : Edisem et Paris : Maloine.
- Gallie, W.B. (1964). Philosophy and the Historical Understanding. New York : Schocken Books.
- Ginzburg, C. (2003). Rapports de force. Histoire, rhétorique, preuve. Paris : Seuil.
- Goldstein, L. (1976). Historical Knowing. Austin : University of Texas Press.
- Goldstein, L. (1996). The What and the Why of History: Philosophical Essays. Leiden : E. J. Brill
- Gorman, J. (2004). Historians and their Duties. History and Theory. 43.103-117.
- Gorman, J. (2007). Historical Judgement: The Limits of Historiographical Choice. Montréal : McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- Hempel, C. G. (1942). The Function of General Laws in History. The Journal of Philosophy. 39.31-45.
- Hexter, J. (1971). Doing History. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
- Hexter, J. (1972). The History Primer. Londres : Penguin Press.
- Iggers, G. G. (2005). Historiography in the Twentieth Century. From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Wesleyan (CT) : Wesleyan University Press.
- Jenkins, K. (dir.) (1997). The Postmodern Reader. Londres : Routledge
- Jenkins, K. (2003). Re-thinking History. Londres : Routledge.
- Kellner, H. (1989). Language and Historical Representation. Getting the Story Crooked. Madison : University of Wisconsin Press.
- Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago : Chicago University Press.
- Kuukkanen, J.-M. (2015). Why We Need to Move from Truth-Functionality to Performativity in Historiography. History and Theory. 54.226-243.
- LaCapra, D. (1980). Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts. History and Theory. 19.245-276.
- LaCapra, D. (1989). Soundings in Critical Theory. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
- Lamont, M. (2009). How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
- Langlois, C.-V. et Seignobos, C. (1897). Introduction aux études historiques. Paris : Hachette.
- Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
- Le Goff, J. (1988). Histoire et mémoire. Paris : Gallimard.
- Le Goff, J. et Roussellier, N. (1995). Préface. In Bédarida, F. (dir.). L’Histoire et le métier d’historien en France 1945-1995. Paris : Maisons des sciences de l’homme. 2-17.
- Lloyd, C. (1993). The Structures of History. Londres : Wiley-Blackwell.
- Lorenz, C. (1994). Historical Knowledge and Historical Reality: a Plea for “Internal Realism”. History and Theory. 33.297-327.
- Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne. Rapport sur le savoir. Paris : Minuit.
- Marwick, A. (1993). The Nature of History. Londres : MacMillan.
- McCullagh, C. B. (2004). The Logic of History: Putting Postmodernism in Perspective. Londres : Routledge.
- Megill, A. (1994). Jörn Rüsen’s Theory of Historiography. History and Theory. 33.39-60.
- Mink, L. (1971). Historians’ Fallacies. Toward a Logic of Historical Thought by David Hackett Fischer. History and Theory. 10.107-122.
- Mink, L. (1987). Historical Understanding. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
- Momigliano, A. (1981) The Rhetoric of History and the History of Rhetoric. Comparative Criticism. 3.259-268.
- Müller, B. (2005). L’opération historiographique chez Paul Ricoeur ou le statut de l’histoire dans l’épistémologie. In Müller, B. (dir.). L’Histoire entre mémoire et épistémologie. Autour de Paul Ricoeur. Lausanne : Payot. 183-203.
- Munslow, A. (1997). Editorial. Rethinking History. 1.1-20.
- Munslow, A. (2003). Preface. In Jenkins, K. Re-thinking History. Londres : Routledge. xi-xvii.
- Nickles, T. (1980). Scientific Discovery and the Future of Philosophy of Science. In Nickles, T. (dir.). Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Boston : D. Reidel. 1-59.
- Noël, P. (2010). Une question de (méta-)épistémologie historique : la liberté de l’historien ou l’autodétermination disciplinaire. In Boivin, J., Lapointe-Gagnon, V., Morin, M. S., et Noël, P. (dir.). Actes du 9e colloque étudiant du Département d’histoire de l’Université Laval. Québec : Artefact. 303-320.
- Noël, P. (2014). Épistémologie, histoire et historiens. Thèse de doctorat (histoire). Université Laval.
- Noiriel, G. (2003). Penser avec, penser contre. Paris : Belin.
- Noiriel, G. (2005). Sur la « crise de l’histoire ». Paris : Gallimard.
- Novick. P. (1988). That Noble Dream. The « Objectivity Question » and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- Oexle, O. G. (2007). L’historisme en débat. Paris : Aubier.
- Offenstadt, N. (2011). L’historiographie. Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
- Pâquet, M. (2002). L’expérience de l’histoire. Pratique et pédagogie. In Frenette, Y., Pâquet, M. et Lamarre, J. (dir.). Les parcours de l’histoire. Hommage à Yves Roby. Québec : Presses de l’Université Laval. 27-57.
- Partner, N. (2013). Foundations: Theoretical Frameworks for Knowledge of the Past. In Partner, N. et Foot, S. (dir.). The Sage Handbook of Historical Theory. Londres : Sage. 1-8.
- Partner, N. et Foot, S. (dir.) (2013). The Sage Handbook of Historical Theory. Londres : Sage.
- Patterson, T. C. (1989). Post-Structuralism, Post-Modernism: Implications for Historians. Social History. 14.83-88.
- Paul, H. (2011a). Performing History: How Historical Scholarship Is Shaped by Epistemic Virtues. History and Theory. 50.1-19.
- Paul, H. (2011b). Self-Images of the Historical Profession: Idealized Practices and Myths of Origin. Storia della Soriografia. 59-60.157-170.
- Pocock, J. (1987). The Concept of Language and the métier d’historien. In Pagden, A. (dir.). The Language of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 19-38.
- Polanyi, M. (1966). The Logic of Tacit Inference. Philosophy. 41.1-18.
- Polanyi, M. (2009). Tacit Knowing. In The Tacit Dimension. Chicago : Chicago University Press. 16-43.
- Prost, A. (1996). Douze leçons sur l’histoire. Paris : Seuil.
- Quine, W. (1969). Epistemology Naturalized. In Quine, W. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York : Columbia University Press. 69-114.
- Rancière, J. (1992). Les noms de l’histoire. Essai de poétique du savoir. Paris : Gallimard.
- Revel, J. (2001). Les sciences historiques. In Berthelot, J.-M. (dir.). Épistémologie des sciences sociales. Paris : Presses universitaires de France. 21-76.
- Ricoeur, P. (1983-1985). Temps et récit. Paris : Seuil.
- Ricoeur, P. (2000). La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli. Paris : Seuil.
- Ryle, G. (1945). Knowing How and Knowing That. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 46.1-16.
- Saussure, F. de (1968). Cours de linguistique générale. Wiesbaden : Harrassowitz.
- Simon, G. (2008). Sciences et histoire. Paris : Gallimard.
- Southgate, B. (2011). Postmodernism. In Tucker, A. (dir.). A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell. 540-549.
- Spiegel, G. M. (1991). History and Post-Modernism. Past and Present. 135.194-208.
- Spiegel, G. M. (dir.) (2005). Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing after the Linguistic Turn. New York : Routledge.
- Spiegel, G. M. (2009). The Task of the Historian. American Historical Review. 141.1-14.
- Stone, L. (1991). History and Post-Modernism. Past and Present. 135. 189-194.
- Thompson, W. (2004). Postmodernism and History. Londres : Palgrave Macmillan.
- Thuillier, G. et Tulard, J. (1993). La méthode en histoire. Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
- Toews, J. E. (2016). Thinking Historically about Thinking Historically: Is Historical Theory a Historical or Metahistorical Practice? History and Theory. 55.91-109.
- Torstendahl, R. (1996). “Correct” and “Fruitful” as Bases for Historiographical Analysis. In Torstendahl, R. et Veit-Brause, I. (dir.). History-Making. The Intellectual and Social Formation of a Discipline. Stockholm : KVHAA. 77-93.
- Tucker, A. (2004). Our Knowledge of the Past. A Philosophy of Historiography. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- Tucker, A. (dir.) (2009). A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell.
- Veit-Brause, I. (2008). Maintaining the Future of Hope. History and Theory. 47.249-260.
- Weber, M. (1992). Essais sur la théorie de la science. Paris : Pocket.
- White, H. (1973a). Metahistory: the Historical Imagination in Nineteenth Century Europe. Baltimore : John Hopkins University Press.
- White, H. (1973b). The Politics of Contemporary Philosophy of History. Clio. 3.35-54.
- White, H. (1987). The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
- White, H. (1995). Response to Arthur Marwick. Journal of Modern History. 30.233-246.
- White, H. (2010). Postmodernisme et histoire. In Delacroix, C., Dosse, R., Garcia, P. et Offenstadt, N. (dir.) Historiographies II. Concepts et débats. Paris : Gallimard. 839-844.
- White, M. (1965). Foundations of Historical Knowledge. New York : Harper and Row.
- Windschuttle, K. (1997). The Killing of History: How Literary Critics and Social Theorists are Murdering our Past. New York : Free Press.
- Zagorin, P. (1998). History, the Referent, and the Narrative: Reflections on Postmodernism Now. History and Theory. 29.263-274.
- Zammito, J. (2011). Historians and Philosophy of Historiography. In Tucker, A. (dir.). A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell. 63-84.
- Zammito, J. (2013). Post-Positivist Realism: Regrounding Representation. In Partner, N. et Foot, S. (dir.). The Sage Handbook of Historical Theory. Londres : Sage. 401-423.
- Zeleňák, E. (2011). Who Should Characterize the Nature of History? The Wrong Question. Storia della Storiografia. 59-60.171-182.