Abstracts
Résumé
L’article porte sur l’évolution comparée de l’usage des notions de multifonctionnalité et de service environnemental dans les politiques agricoles. Constat est fait que si les notions de services écosystémiques et environnementaux s’affirment alors que disparaît celle de multifonctionnalité elles n’en constituent pas pour autant un substitut. Ces deux types de notions ont des histoires parallèles et sont portées par des acteurs différents. Les raisons de leurs destins inversés doivent être recherchées dans leur cohérence avec les nouveaux corpus normatifs en émergence au niveau international encadrant les interventions publiques en matière agricole, forestière et environnementale.
Mots-clés :
- Services environnementaux,
- agriculture,
- multifonctionnalité,
- services écosystémiques,
- politiques publiques,
- foresterie
Abstract
The article focuses on the compared evolution of the use of the notions of multifunctionality and environmental service in agricultural policy. It has been observed that the SE is not a substitute to the MFA, although the concepts of ecosystem and environmental services are strengthening while multifunctionality is disappearing. Different actors have mobilized these two kinds of concepts which have got parallel histories. The reasons for their reverse development paths must be sought in their coherence with the new normative corpus which is emerging at international level and is governing the agricultural, forest and environmental public interventions.
Keywords:
- Ecosystem services,
- environmental services,
- agriculture,
- multifonctionality,
- forest,
- policy
Download the article in PDF to read it. Download
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Aumand, A., T. Le Cotty et T. Voituriez, 2001, Changeons de multi-fonctionnalité, Le courrier de la Planète,65, pp. 48-50. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Aznar, O., 2002, Services environnementaux et espaces ruraux. Une approche par l’économie des services. Thèse en économie, Université de Bourgogne, 275p.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Baylis, K., S. Peplow, G. Rausser et L. Simon, 2008, Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: A comparison, Ecological Economics,65, pp.753-764.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bouet, A., 2002, La fin de l’exception agricole, 13p., CEPII, L’économie mondiale 2002, La Découverte, coll. Repères, Paris, pp.77-89.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Boyd, J. et S. Banzhaf, 2007, What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecological Economics, 63(2-3), pp. 616-626.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cairol, D., E. Coudel, K. Knickelc, P. Caronb et M. Kröger., 2009, Multifunctionality of Agriculture and Rural Areas as Reflected in Policies : The Importance and Relevance of the Territorial View, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11, 4, pp. 269-289.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Caron, P. et T. Le Cotty, 2006, General Conclusion. A review of the different concepts of multifuncionality and their evolution. European Series on Multifunctionality, 10, pp. 175-179. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farberk, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. V. O’Neill, J. Paruelo, R. G. Raskin, P. Suttonkk et M. van den Belt, 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, pp. 253-260. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Daily, G.C., S. Alexander, P.R. Ehrlich, L. Goulder, J. Lubchenco, P.A. Matson, H.A. Mooney, S. Postel, S.H. Schneider, D. Tilman et G.M. Woodwell, 1997, Ecosystem services : benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems, Issues in Ecology, 2, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Delorme, H., 2003, Ambigüité et richesse de la multifonctionnalité, Ceri, Sciences Po, Paris, [En ligne] URL : http://www.ceri-sciencespo.com/archive/july03/arthd.pdf . Consulté le 20 octobre 2011.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Egoh, B., M. Rouget, B. Reyers, A.T. Knight, R.M. Cowling, A.S. van Jaarsveld et A. Welz, 2007, Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecological Economics 63, 4, pp. 714-721.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- FAO, 2007, La situation mondiale de l'alimentation et de l'agriculture : payer les agriculteurs pour les services environnementaux, FAO, Rome, 259p.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ferraro, P. J. et R. D. Simpson, 2002, The Cost-Effectiveness of Conservation Payments, Land Economics 78, 3, pp. 339-353.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gómez-Baggethun, E., R. de Groot, P.L.Lomas et C. Montes, 2010, The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, pp. 1209-1218.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Grieg-Gran, M., I. Porras et S. Wunder, 2005, How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America, World Development, 33, 9, pp. 1511-1527.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Guyomard, H., J. P. Butault et C. Le Mouël, 2004, Soutien interne, fonctions non-marchandes et multifonctionnalité de l’agriculture, Les cahiers de la multifonctionnalité, 4, pp. 9-24.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hediger, W. et K. Knickel, 2009, Multifuncionality and Sustainability of Agriculture and Rural Areas: A welfare Economics Perspective, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11, 4, 291-313.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hermelin, B. Et J.O. Rolland, 2001. L’agriculture à l’OMC : changeons le débat!, Courrier de la Planète, 65, vol.V, p.1. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Karsenty, A., 2010, Paiements pour services environnementaux et biodiversité dans les pays du sud Le salut par la « déforestation évitée », Revue Tiers Monde, 202, pp. 57-74.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Karsenty, A., 2010, Que sont les paiements pour services environnementaux? Eléments de définition et essai de classification, Programme SERENA, Note de synthèse, n°2010-06, 7 p.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Korenaga, T., 2001, L’exception culturelle, Le courrier de la Planète, 65, pp. 51-53.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Landell-Mills, N. et I. Porras, 2002, Silvert bullet or fool's gold? A global review of markets for forests environmental services and their impact on the poor, Instrument for sustainable private sector forestry, IIED, Londres, 272 p.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Le Cotty T., A. Aumand et T. Voituriez, 2003, Multifonctionnalité et coopération multilatérales - Une analyse du coût de fourniture de biens publics par l'agriculture, Économie Rurale, n° 273-274, p. 91-102.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Legrand, T., J.F. Le Coq, G. Froger et F. Saenz., 2010, Émergence et usages de la notion de Service environnemental au Costa Rica : L’exemple du Programme de Paiement pour Services environnementaux (PPSE)”, Programme SERENA, Document de travail n°2010-03, 54p.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lescuyer, G., 2005, La biodiversité, un nouveau gombo ?, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 13, pp. 311-315.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lugo, E., 2008, Ecosystem services, the millenium ecosystem assessment, and the conceptual difference between benefits provided by ecosystems and benefits provided by people, Journal of land use, 23, 2, pp. 243-262.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lyytimaki, J., L. Petersen, B. Normander et P. Bezak, 2008, Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle, Environmental Sciences, 3, 5, pp. 161-172.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mahé, L.-P., 2001, " La multifonctionnalité en quête de légitimité ", Problèmes économiques, n° 2719, 27 juin, p. 1-3.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- MCCauley, D., 2006, Selling out on nature, Nature, 7, 443, pp.27-28.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Méral, P., 2010, Les services environnementaux en économie : revue de la littérature, programme Serena, Document de travail, 2010-05. 50p.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- MIT, 1970, Report of the Study of Critical Environmental Problems SCEP: Man's Impact on the Global Environment, Assessment and Recommendations for Action., The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 319 p. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mollard, A., 2003, Multifonctionnalité de l’agriculture et territoires : des concepts aux politiques publiques, Cahiers d’Économie et Sociologie Rurales, n 66, p. 28-54.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mollard, A., 2002, Multifonctionnalité, externalités et territoires, Les cahiers de la multifonctionnalité, 1, pp. 37-56. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mooney, H. A. et P. R. Ehrlich, 1997, Ecosystem services: A fragmentary history. In : Daily G. (eds), Nature's Services.Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Island Press, Washington DC, pp. 11-19.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Muradian, R., E. Corbera, D. Unai Pascual, E. Nicolás Kosoy, H. MA. Peter, 2010, Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, pp. 1202-1208.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- OMC, 2004, Négociations de l’OMC sur l’agriculture. Questions visées et état d’avancement. Mise à jour : 1er décembre 2004, [En ligne] URL : www.wto.org/French/tratop_f/agric_f/negs_bkgrnd00_contents_f.htmGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- OMC, 2001, OMC. Déclaration ministérielle de Doha. 2001, [En ligne] URL : www.wto.org/french/theWTO_f/minist_f/min01_f/mindecl_f.htmGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- ONU, 2002, Plan de mise en oeuvre du sommet mondial pour le développement durable, [En ligne] URL : www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/French/POIToc.htm Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pagiola, S., 2002, Paying for water services in Central America : learning from Costa Rica, 26 p., S., Pagiola, J. Bishop, N. Landell -Mills. Selling forest environmental services: market-based mechanisms for forest conservation and development, Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp.37-62Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pagiola, S. et G. Platais, 2002, Payments for Environmental Services, Environment Strategy Notes, World Bank, Washington, 3, pp. 1-4.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ploeg, J.D. A. van der, A. Long et J. Banks, 2002, Living Countrysides. Rural Development Processes in Europe: The State of Art, Elservier, Doetiinchem. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Solagral, 2001, Les agricultures du Sud et l’OMC. Quelles négociations à l’OMC après Seattle? Fiche 7. Solagral, Nogent sur Marne. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- TEEB, 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Mainstreaming the economics of nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. 39p.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Thiébaut, L., 1996, Les fonctions environnementales de l’agriculture périurbaine, Cahiers Agricultures, 5 3, pp. 171-77Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Volanen, R., 2000, For Harmony of functions : On governance of multifunctionality and its scientific support – the point of view of the ecological function, Paper presented at the Seminar “Science and Governance: CAP and Multifunctionality of Agriculture within the European Research Area”, 23-24 October 2000, Montpellier. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wunder, S. C., J. Börner, M. Tito et L.S. Pereira (Eds.), 2008, Pagamentos por serviços ambientais: perspectiva para a Amazona Legal, Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasilia.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wunder, S., 2005, Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Boots, CIFOR Occasional Paper n°42, [En ligne] URL : http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/occpapers/op-42.pdf Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wunder, S., 2005, The efficiency of PES in tropical conservation, Conservation Biology, 21, 1, pp. 48-58. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Zbinden, S. et D. Lee, 2005, Paying for Environmental Services: An Analysis of Participation in Costa Rica’s PSA Program, World developement, 33, 2, pp.255-272.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar