Bunn, Stephanie (ed.). Anthropology and Beauty: From Aesthetic to Creativity. New York: Routledge, 2018, 483 pages

This imposing volume explores varied perspectives on the experience and production of what the contributors of the twenty-eight chapters of the book take to be ‘beauty.’ Bunn’s edited volume offers an understanding of the recent trend of the anthropological thinking of art, aesthetics, and creativity, and aims to see the value of an anthropological approach to beauty which illuminates some of the shared preoccupations of scholars of aesthetics. The book does not so much analyze beauty or reflect on the philosophical trends that theorize it, but instead, in an anthropological gesture, each chapter explores beauty as something non-static, as a form of action, as the result of actions, as something both universal and relative, and as something that is lived by people through their senses. In so doing, this volume gives voice to the everyday experience of beauty. This bridges the divide between an evaluative aesthetic approach in which beauty is lodged in the object under consideration, and a relativistic approach, which is key to anthropology and takes such judgment to be solely subjective. The approach of this book is to consider beauty as dynamic and living processes experienced through relationships, whether between person and thing; makers and the made; person and process or action; person and environment; or person and person. These experiential and relational approaches are explored in the eight parts of the book. These chapters are preceded by an introduction, which sets the table for some of the complex philosophical ideas developed in the book. Part 1 shows how beauty as it relates to patterning and mathematical cognition can be grasped and experienced as affective through actions of the body and the social. This breaks with the analytical tendency to assume that patterns articulate meanings that are produced elsewhere. Küchler’s Chapter 2 shows how graphic gesture encapsulated in the patterns of Oceanian art forms express sociocultural knowledge, such as navigational information, and social relationship. We here have a great illustration of how ethnography can contribute to our understanding of how beauty is lived as the author writes: “Anthropology has a lot to offer to our understanding of how beauty works, what it does and why it matters to the human propensity to intuit how to be in relation with persons and objects via objects that were produced with beauty in mind” (32). Part 2 explores beauty as grace in works of art. In Chapter 4, D’Alessandro shows how, among the Navajo, the beauty of the process of creating, in this case weaving, is encapsulated in the object that is made so other people can experience beauty. In the beauty of a piece of art there is a moment where the viewer may experience how the artist sees the world. In this precise moment, the viewer and the producer can experience a symbiosis. Here, it is the power of the work through its creation which radiates beauty that is relevant. Presenting an account of beauty in dialogue with the notion of grace in the work of sculptor Douglas White and anthropologist Gregory Bateson, Chapter 5 suggests the experience of beauty is an unexplained gift that we can encounter in everyday moments that constitutes “small tears of fabric of ordinary life” (67). Part 3 addresses how beauty is perceived, in chapters that explore the experience of beauty through the senses. Different cultures have placed attention on different senses, including verbal communication in Chapter 8, sound in Chapter 9, vision and color in Chapter 10, and light in Chapter 11. Part 4 considers skillfulness. While most of the anthropological research about skills mostly focuses on the hand-made and the craft, …