Résumés
Résumé
Le présent article explore les relations entre la confiance, les connaissances et l’expertise dans le contexte de l’action policière (policing). Dans un premier temps, l’auteur analyse, à la lumière des résultats des recherches récentes sur la police, les divers modèles d’action policière apparus depuis la fin des années 1960 et les regroupe en trois grandes tendances selon leur façon de concevoir les relations entre la police et les citoyens. Ensuite, il examine comment la police peut établir une plus grande confiance entre elle et le public et contribuer à améliorer les relations mutuelles de confiance entre les citoyens. En conclusion, l’auteur propose quelques critères pour reconnaître le caractère démocratique d’une police.
Mots-clés :
- Action policière,
- policing,
- expertise policière,
- réformes policières
Abstract
This article explore the relationships between trust, knowledge and expertise in matters of policing. Firstly, the author analyses different models of police action, in light of the results of empirical studies on policing published since 1960, and that he groups in three main tendencies according to their way of seeing the relationship between citizens and the police. Secondly, he examines how the police can enhance the public’s trust towards itself and improve mutual relationships of trust between citizens. The author concludes by proposing criteria aimed at recognising the democratic character of a police force.
Keywords:
- Police action,
- policing,
- police expertise,
- police reforms
Resumen
El presente artículo analiza las relaciones entre la confianza, los conocimientos y la profesionalización en la acción policiaca. En primera instancia el autor analiza, a partir de los resultados de investigaciones recientes, los diversos modelos de acción policial surgidos luego de los años 1960, que agrupa en tres grandes tendencias según la forma de concebir las relaciones entre la policía y los ciudadanos. Aborda a continuación la manera en que la policía puede establecer una relación de mayor confianza con la ciudadanía para contribuir con ello a mejorar las relaciones mutuas. Por último, el autor propone algunos criterios para reconocer el carácter democrático de una agrupación policiaca.
Palabras clave:
- Acción policiaca,
- profesionalización policial,
- reformas policiacas,
- relaciones policía-ciudadanos
Parties annexes
Références de la note introductive
- Goldsmith, A. (2005). Police reform and the problem of trust. Theoretical Criminology, 9 (4), 443-470.
- Stoutland, S. (2001). The multiple dimensions of trust in resident/police relations in Boston. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38 (3), 226-256.
- Tyler, T., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law : Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
Bibliographie
- Bayley, D. H. (Ed.) (1998). What Works in Policing. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- Brodeur, J.-P. (1998). Tailor-Made Policing : A Conceptual Investigation. In J.-P. Brodeur (Ed.), How to Recognize Good Policing (30-51). Thousand Oaks (CA) : Sage.
- Brodeur, J.-P., & Shearing, C. D. (2005). Configuring Security and Justice. European Journal of Criminology, 2, 379-406.
- Bullock, K., Erol, R., & Tilley, N. (2006). Problem-Oriented Policing and Partnerships. Cullompton, Devon (UK) : Willan.
- Canada (2007). Rapport du Groupe de travail sur la gouvernance et le changement culturel à la GRC (rapport Brown). Ottawa : GRC.
- CEPOL – Collège européen de la police (2007). Perspectives of Police Science in Europe. Project Group on a European Approach to Police Science. Bramshill, UK : CEPOL.
- Commission canadienne sur la détermination de la peine (1987). La réforme de la détermination des peines. Une approche canadienne. Rapport de la Commission canadienne sur la détermination de la peine. Ottawa : Ministère de l’Approvisionnement et Services Canada.
- Cope, N. (2004). From Intelligence Led Policing to Police Led Intelligence. British Journal of Criminology, 44 (2), 188-203.
- Ericson, R. V., & Haggerty, K. (1997). Policing the Risk Society. Toronto : University of Toronto Press.
- Fielding, N., & Innes, M. (2006). Reassurance Policing, Community Policing and Measuring Police Performance. Policing and Society, 16 (2), 127-145.
- Gassin, R. (2007). Criminologie. Paris : Dalloz.
- Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-Oriented policing. New York : Mc Graw Hill.
- Greenwood, P. W., & Petersilia, J. (1998). The Criminal Investigation Process : Volume I : Summary and Policy recommendations. In D H. Bayley (Ed.), What Works in Policing (75-105). Oxford : Oxford University Press (initialement publié par la Rand Corporation en 1975).
- Groopman, J. (2007). How Doctors Think. Boston : Houghton Miffin.
- Hurley, D. (6 janvier 2004). On Crime as Science (A Neighbor at a Time). The New York Times, D1-2.
- Manning, P. K. (2003). Policing Contingencies. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
- Mastrofski, S. D., Worden, R. E., & Snipes, J. B. (1995). Law enforcement in a Time of Community Policing. Criminology, 33 (4), 539-563.
- Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and Violent Crime : A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy. Science, 277 (5328), 918-924.
- Sampson, R., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic Observations of Public Spaces : A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105 (3), 603-651.
- Skogan, W. (2006a). The Promise of Community Policing. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (2006) (Eds.), Police Innovations. Contrasting Perspectives (27-43). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- Skogan, W. (2006b). Police and Communities in Chicago. A tale of Three cities. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- Skogan, W. (2006c). Asymmetry in the Impact of Encounters with the Police. Policing and Society, 16 (2), 99-126.
- Taubes, G. (16 septembre 2007). Do We Really Know What Makes Us Healthy ? The New York Times Magazine, section 6, 52-80.
- Tuffin, R. (2006). The National Reassurance Policing Programme : a Six-Site Evaluation. Home Office : Findings 272 (http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk.rds.pubintro1.html)
- Weisburd, D., & Braga, A. A. (Eds.) (2006). Police Innovations. Contrasting Perspectives. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- Williams, H., & Murphy, P. V. (1990). The Evolving Strategy of Police : A Minority View. Washington, U.S. : Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
- Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken Windows. The Atlantic Monthly, 211, 29-38.