Résumés
Résumé
Le travail social est une profession qui s’est grandement transformée au cours des dernières décennies, modulée par les diverses transformations sociales, politiques et organisationnelles de la société dans laquelle elle évolue. Or, on retrouve aujourd’hui des recherches de plus en plus diversifiées, où plusieurs visions du travail social coexistent. Ces visions multiples s’accompagnent de valeurs et de principes, mais également d’idéologies tantôt dominantes, tantôt marginales. Les peuples autochtones sont l’un des groupes les plus marginalisés et leurs visions du monde le sont tout autant au sein de la profession. Aujourd’hui, il semble y avoir une volonté de reconnaître la pluralité des savoirs en travail social. Le présent article poursuit cet objectif en présentant le paradigme autochtone en recherche. Il s’agit d’une réflexion théorique qui s’articule autour du contexte historique menant à la création du paradigme, une description de ce qui le compose de même qu’une présentation de quelques exemples de son utilisation par des chercheurs en travail social. Enfin, l’article met en lumière certains enjeux persistants quant à la reconnaissance du paradigme autochtone au sein de la profession.
Mots-clés :
- paradigme autochtone,
- recherche,
- travail social,
- épistémologies,
- méthodologies
Abstract
Social work as a profession has undergone significant change in recent decades, modulated by the various social, political, and organizational transformations of the society in which it evolves. Today, there is increasingly diversified research encompassing a number of coexisting visions of social work. These multiple visions come hand in hand with values, principles, as well as ideologies, some of which are dominant, and others that are marginal. Indigenous peoples are among the most marginalized groups in society and so are Indigenous worldviews within the profession. Currently, there seems to be a willingness to recognize the plurality of knowledge in the area of social work. In line with this objective, the purpose of this article is to present the Indigenous research paradigm. This is a theoretical contemplation centred around the historical context that led to the paradigm’s creation, a description of what it consists of, as well as a presentation of a few examples of its use by social work researchers. Finally, the paper brings up certain persistent issues related to the recognition of the Indigenous paradigm within the profession.
Keywords:
- Indigenous paradigm,
- research,
- social work,
- epistemologies,
- methodologies
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Absolon, K. E. (2011). Kaandossiwin : How we come to know. Halifax, Nouvelle-Écosse : Ferwood Publishing.
- ACFTS (2014). Normes d’agrément [En ligne]. Repéré à https://caswe-acfts.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/CASWE-ACFTS.NormesDagrement.pdf
- Allen, H. (1988). History matters : A commentary on divergent interpretations of Australian history. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2, 79-89.
- Anderson, M. S. et Neumann, I. B. (2012). Practices as models: A methodology with an illustration concerning Wampum diplomacy. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 40(3), 457-481.
- Baskin, C. (2006). Aboriginal world views as challenges and possibilities in social work education. Critical Social Work, 7(2), 1-16.
- Baskin, C. et Sinclair, R. (2015). Social work and Indigenous Peoples in Canada. Encyclopedia of Social Work [En ligne]. Repéré à http://socialwork.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.001.0001/acrefore-9780199975839-e-953
- Beauclair, N. (2015). Épistémologies autochtones et décolonialité: Réflexions autour de la philosophie interculturelle latino-américaine. Recherches amérindiennes au Québec, 45(2), 67–76.
- Beckett, J. (1994). Aboriginal histories, aboriginal myths: An introduction. Oceania, 65(2), 97-115.
- Bhargava, R. (2013). Pour en finir avec l’injustice épistémique du colonialisme. Penser global, 1, 41-75.
- Blackstock, C. (2009). The occasional evil of angels: Learning from the experiences of aboriginal peoples and social work. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 4(1), 28-37.
- Blagg, H., Williams, E., Cummings, E. Hovane, V., Torres, M. et Nangala Woodley, K. (2018). Innovative models in addressing violence against Indigenous women: Final report. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS), Australia: University of Western Australia.
- Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. New Mexico, États-Unis: Clear Light Publishing.
- Centre des Premières Nations (2007). PCAP : propriété, contrôle, accès et possession. Approuvé par le Comité de gouvernance sur l’information des Premières Nations, Assemblée des Premières Nations. Ottawa, ON : Organisation nationale de la santé autochtone.
- Chilisa, B. (2011). Indigenous research methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Coates, J., Gray, M. et Hetherington, T. (2006). An ‘ecospiritual’ perspective: Finally, a place for Indigenous approaches. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 381-399.
- Commission royale sur les peuples autochtones (CRPA) (1996). Vers un ressourcement, Rapport de la Commission royale sur les peuples autochtones, vol.3. Ottawa, ON: Ministère des Approvisionnements et Services Canada.
- Connell, R., Beigel, F. et Ouédraogo, J.-B. (2017). Building knowledge from fractured epistemologies. African Review of Social Sciences Methodology, 2(1-2), 5-13.
- Cordero, C. (1995). A Working and Evolving Definition of Culture. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 21, 28-41.
- Dei, G. J., Hall, B. et Rosenberg, D. G. (2000). Indigenous knowledges in global contexts: Multiple readings of our world. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
- Descola, P. (2005). Par-delà nature et culture. Paris, France: Gallimard.
- Dominelli, L., Ioakimidis, V. (2016). The challenges of realising social justice in 21st century social work. International Social Work, 59(6), 693-696.
- Dumbrill, G. C. et Green, J. (2008). Indigenous knowledge in the social work academy. Social Work Education, 27(5), 489-503.
- Emeagwali, G. et Dei, G. J. (2014). Anti-colonial educational perspectives for transformative change. African Indigenous knowledges and the disciplines. Rotterdam, Hollande : Sense Publishers.
- Ermine, W. (1995). Aboriginal Epistemology. Dans M. Battiste et J. Barman, (dirs.), First Nations education in Canada: The circle unfolds (pp.101-112). Vancouver, CB : UBC Press.
- Estrada, J. V. M. (2005). The tree of life as a research methodology. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 34, 44–52.
- Feit, H. (2000). Les animaux comme partenaires de chasse : réciprocité chez les Cris de la Baie James. Terrain, 34, 123-142.
- Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. Third Edition. New York, États-Unis : Verso.
- Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir : naissance de la prison. Paris, France: Éditions Gallimard.
- Gegeo, D. W. et Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (2001). “How we know”: Kwara’ae rural villagers doing Indigenous epistemology. The Contemporary Pacific, 13(1), 55-88.
- Ghel, L. (2017). Claiming Anishinaabe. Decolonizing the human spirit. Regina, SK : University of Regina Press.
- Gill, J. H. (2002). Native American worldviews: An introduction. New York, États-Unis : Humanity Press.
- Gray, M., Coates, J., Yellow Bird, M. et Hetherington, T. (2013). Decolonizing social work. New York, Etats-Unis : Routledge.
- Guay, C. (2017). Le savoir autochtone dans tous ses états. Regards sur la pratique singulière des intervenants sociaux innus de Uashat mak Mani-Utenam. Québec, QC : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Hampton, E. (1995). Towards a redefinition of indian education. Dans M. Battiste & J. Barman (dirs.), First Nations education in Canada: The circle unfolds (pp. 5–46). Vancouver, CB : UBC Press.
- Hart, M. A. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: The development of an Indigenous research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work, 1(1), 1-16.
- Henderson-Youngblood, J. S. (2000). Aboriginal tenure in the constitution of Canada. Ontario: Carswell.
- Hugman (2009). But is it social work? Some reflections on mistaken identities. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1138-1153.
- Keewatin, A. (2002). Balanced research: Understanding an Indigenous paradigm. Thèse de doctorat, Intercultural Education, Department of Educational Policy Studies, University of Alberta.
- Kidd, R. (1994). Regulating bodies: Administrations and aborigines in Queensland 1840-1988. Thèse de doctorat, Griffith University, Australie.
- Kovach, M. (2006). Searching for arrowheads: An inquiry into approaches to Indigenous research using a tribal methodology with a Nêhiýaw Kiskêýihtamowin worldview. Thèse doctorale en études interdisciplinaires (travail social et études autochtones), Université de Victoria.
- Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations and contexts. Toronto, ON : University of Toronto Press.
- Kovach, M. (2015). Emerging from the margins: Indigenous methodologies. Dans S. Strega & L. Brown (dirs.), Research as resistance: Revisiting critical, Indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches (2e ed., pp. 43–64). Toronto, ON : Canadian Scholars’ Press / Women’s Press.
- Kuhn, T. (1983). La structure des révolutions scientifiques. Paris, France : Flammarion.
- Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris, France : La Découverte.
- Lien Do, K. (2003). L’exploration du dialogue de Bohm comme approche d’apprentissage : une recherche collaborative. Thèse de doctorat en technologie de l’enseignement, Faculté des sciences de l’éducation, Université Laval. Repéré à https://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/QQLA/TC-QQLA-20640.pdf
- Lincoln, Y. S. et Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. Dans N. K. Denzin et Y. S. Lincoln (2e ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 168-172), Londres, Angleterre : Sage.
- Little Bear, L. (2000). Jagged worldviews colliding. Dans M. Battiste (dir.), Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision (pp.77-86). Vancouver, CB : UBC Press.
- Martin, K. (2003). Aboriginal people, aboriginal lands and indigenist research: A discussion of research pasts and neo-colonial research futures. Mémoire de maîtrise, School of Indigenous Studies, James Cook University, Townsville.
- McKenzie, B. et Morrisette, V. (2003). Social work practice with Canadians of aboriginal background : Guidelines for respectful social work. Dans A. AlKrenawi et J. R. Graham (dirs.), Multicultural Social Work in Canada: Working with Diverse Ethno-Racial Communities (pp. 251-279). Toronto, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
- Mkabela, Q. (2005). Using the Afrocentric method in researching Indigenous african culture. The Qualitative Report, 10(1), 178–189.
- Owusuh-Ansah, F. et Mji, G. (2013). African Indigenous knowledge and research. African Journal of Disability, 2(1), 1-5.
- Quijano, A., et Wallerstein, I. (1992). La americanidad como concepto, o América en el moderno sistema mundial. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, 134, 583-591.
- Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. New Jersey, États-Unis : Princeton University Press.
- Rice, B. (2005). Seeing the world with Aboriginal eyes: A four dimensional perspective on human and non-human values, cultures and relationships on Turtle Island. Winnipeg, MB : Aboriginal Issues Press.
- Rigney, L. (1997). Internationalisation of an Indigenous anti-colonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to indigenist research methodology and its principles. Wicazo Sa Review, 14(2), 109-121.
- Ruwhiu, D. et Cathro, V. (2014). ‘Eyes-wide-shut,’ Insights from an Indigenous research methodology. Emergence, Complexity & Organisation, 16(4), 1-11.
- Saini, M. (2012). Revue systématique des modèles de recherche occidentaux et autochtones : évaluation de la validation croisée pour l’exploration de la compatibilité et de la convergence. Prince George, CB : Centre de collaboration nationale de la santé autochtone.
- Simpson, L. (2000a). Anishinaabe ways of knowing. Dans J. Oakes, R. Riew, S. Koolage, L. Simpson, & N. Schuster (dirs.), Aboriginal health, identity and resources (pp. 165-185). Winnipeg, MB : Native Studies Press.
- Simpson, L. (2000b). Stories, dreams, and ceremonies - Anishinaabe ways of learning. Tribal College Journal, 11(4), 1-7.
- Sinclair, R. (2009). Identity or racism? Aboriginal transracial adoption. Dans R. Sinclair, M. Hart et G. Bruyere (dirs.), Wicihitowin: Aboriginal social work in Canada (pp. 89-113). Winnipeg, MB: Fernwood Publishing.
- Singh, M. et Major, J. (2017). Conducting Indigenous research in western knowledge spaces: Aligning theory and methodology. The Australian Association for Research in Education, 44(1), 5-19.
- Smith, L. T., (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. New York, États-Unis : Zed Books.
- Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2eedition). Londres, UK : Zed Books.
- Steinhauer, P. (2001). Situating myself in research. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 26, 69-81.
- Tafoya, T. (1995). Finding harmony: Balancing traditional values with western science in therapy. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 21, 7-27.
- Thomas, W. et Bellefeuille, G. (2006). An evidence-based formative evaluation of a cross-cultural Aboriginal mental health program in Canada. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 5(3), 1446-7984.
- Thompson, J. (2008). Hede kehe’hotzi’kahidi’: My journey to a Tahlatan research paradigm. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 31(1) 24-39.
- Weber-Pillwax, C. (2001). What is Indigenous research? Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), 166-174.
- Wenger-Nabigon, A. (2010). The Cree medicine wheel as an organizing paradigm of theories of human development. Native Social Work Journal, 7(1), 139-161.
- Wilson, S. (2003). Processing toward an Indigenous research paradigm in Canada and Australia. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 27(2), 161-178.
- Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony. Indigenous research methods. Halifax, NÉ : Fernwood Publishing.
10.7202/1038042ar