Citer cet article
- MLA
-
Hayman, Richard. « LIS Practitioner-focused Research Trends Toward Open Access Journals, Academic-focused Research Toward Traditional Journals / Chang, Y-W. (2017). Comparative study of characteristics of authors between open access and non-open access journals in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 39(1), 8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.01.002. » Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, volume 13, numéro 1, 2018, p. 24–26. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29377
- APA
-
Hayman, R. (2018). Compte rendu de [LIS Practitioner-focused Research Trends Toward Open Access Journals, Academic-focused Research Toward Traditional Journals / Chang, Y-W. (2017). Comparative study of characteristics of authors between open access and non-open access journals in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 39(1), 8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.01.002]. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 13(1), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29377
- Chicago
-
Hayman, Richard « LIS Practitioner-focused Research Trends Toward Open Access Journals, Academic-focused Research Toward Traditional Journals / Chang, Y-W. (2017). Comparative study of characteristics of authors between open access and non-open access journals in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 39(1), 8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.01.002 ». Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 13, no 1 (2018) : 24–26. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29377
Exporter la notice de cet article
RIS
EndNote, Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
ENW
EndNote (version X9.1 et +), Zotero
BIB
BibTeX, JabRef, Mendeley, Zotero
