Ethnology museums are developing and spreading at a striking rate in Quebec and in the rest of Canada, in First World countries as well as in the Third World. In Canada, the number of museums has increased considerably over the last 30 years. There are currently over 1,300 museums in the country visited by some 26 million people annually. The temples of post-modern times, museums pop up as churches once did in our 19th century cities and countryside. States, provinces, regions, cities and even the smallest towns want a museum to call their own in the hope that it will help enhance their historical memory, negotiate new alliances and affirm their identity, in short, secure their existence in the world. Just as in another era a village or an urban neighborhood without a church was marginal in a community of believers, today a population without a museum is deprived of the sense of cultural belonging created by a public place. In other words, existing beyond the reaches of tourist-inspired cultural awareness is tantamount to existing without recognition. In response to this social demand, governments create subsidy programs to fund the growing number of museums, and universities develop training programs in museology to provide the needed skilled labor. More and more often, ethnology students are turning to museums as a principal outlet on the job market. How can this dizzying growth of museums be explained? What is the meaning of the institution’s importance in the new political economy of our post-modern and post-colonial world? This generally positive assessment should not conceal the serious problems that ethnology museums are currently experiencing. Curators warn of the difficulties that lie ahead. Some wonder whether ethnology museums have already seen their golden age and whether they will not disappear altogether (Halpin and Ames 1999; Hudson 1991). Others think that ethnology museums have become simply places of memory, void of meaning and out of sync with their initial mission; therefore it would be better to burn them all down (Galinier and Molinié 1998; Gonseth, Hainard and Kaehr 2002; Jamin 1998). This is especially the case for ethnology museums of the old colonial powers of Europe — France, England, Holland, Belgium, Spain, Portugal — which sought to solidify and reinforce links with their colonies. With the decline of colonialism, these institutions have become simple warehouses for collections of assorted objects stripped of all representational power and remain of little interest to anyone. On the other hand, museums in countries born of colonization — nations where heirs of the colonizers and the colonized still live side by side — suffer the ill effects of there being too many contending interests and the negative impact of disputes of all kinds. In Canada, as in the United States and Australia, Aboriginal peoples call the authority of museums into question, demanding a say in the presentation of native objects, and sometimes the repatriation of their collections (Jones 1996; Mauzé 2001; Parezo 1998; Peers 2000; Simpson 1996; Dubuc 2002). In these “new” countries, members of so-called cultural communities also want access to museums in order to be recognized and appreciated within the heart of the nation. How can the discourse of the colonizer and the colonized or the viewpoint of the ethnographer and the “ethnographed” coexist in one space? In our increasingly pluralistic societies, how can national museums bring together the inevitably divergent interests of the different groups that make up the nation? Not all ethnographic museums are cast from the same mould. The great diversity of their missions, and of their challenges, must be acknowledged. A first distinction can be …
Parties annexes
References
- Ames, Michael M. 1992. Cannibal Tours and Glass Boxes. The Anthropology of Museums, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
- –––––. 1999. “How to Decorate a House : The Re-Negociation of Cultural Representations at the University of British Columbia Museum of Anthropology”. Museum Anthropology, (22) 3: 41-51.
- Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- –––––. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Barringer, Tim and Tom Flynn (eds.). 1998. Colonialism and the Object. Empire, Material Culture and the Museum. New York: Rouledge.
- Baudrillard, Jean. 1968. Le système des objets. Paris: Denoël / Gonthier.
- Bazin, Jean and Alban Bensa. 1994. “Des objets à la chose”. Genèses 17: 4-7.
- Bennett, Tony. 1995. The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. New York: Routledge.
- Clifford, James. 1997. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
- Dubuc, Élise. 2002. “Entre l’art et l’autre, l’émergence du sujet”. In Gonseth, Marc-Olivier, Jacques Hainard and Roland Kaehr (eds.), Le Musée cannibale. Neuchâtel, Musée d’ethnographie : 31-58.
- Feest, Christian. 1998. “Transformations of a Mask: Confidential Intelligence from the Lifeway of Things”. Baessler-Archiv (Berlin): 255-293.
- Galinier, Jacques and Antoinette Molinié. 1998. “Le crépuscule des lieux: mort et renaissance du musée d’ethnographie”. Gradhiva 24: 93-102.
- Gonseth, Marc-Olivier, Jacques Hainard and Roland Kaehr. 2002. “Le Musée cannibale”. In Gonseth, Marc-Olivier, Jacques Hainard et Roland Kaehr (eds.), Le Musée cannibale. Neuchâtel, Musée d’ethnographie: 9-14.
- Halpin, Marjorie M. and Michael M. Ames. 1999. “Musées et Premières Nations au Canada”. Ethnologie française 29: 431-436.
- Handler, Richard. 1993. “An Anthropological Definition of the Museum and Its Purpose”. Museum Anthropology 17-1: 33-36.
- Hudson, Kenneth. 1991. “How Misleading Does an Ethnographical Museum Have to Be?” In Karp, Ivan and Steven D. Lavine (eds.), Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press: 457-464.
- Jamin, Jean. 1998. “Faut-il brûler les musées d’ethnologie?” Gradhiva 24: 65-69.
- Jones, Anna Laura. 1993. “Exploding Canons: The Anthropology of Museums”. Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 201-220
- Karp, Ivan and Steven D. Lavine (eds). 1991. Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
- Krech, Sheppard and Barbara A. Hail (eds.). 1999. Collecting Native America, 1870-1960. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
- Mauvé, Marie. 1999. “Un patrimoine, deux musées: la restitution de la Potlatch Collection”. Ethnologie française 29: 419-430.
- –––––. 2001. “Collectes, collecteurs, collections (Amérique du Nord)”. Gradhiva 29: 59-61.
- Meyers, Fred R. 2001. The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
- Mihesuah, Devon A. 2000. Repatriation Reader. Who Owns American Indian Remains? Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
- Miller, Daniel. 1998. “Why some things matter”. In Daniel Miller (ed.), Material Cultures. Chicago, University of Chicago Press: 3-21.
- Muller, Jean-Claude. 1999. “Sous le masque africain, quelques faux-semblants”. In Gonseth, Marc-Olivier, Jacques Hainard et Roland Kaehr (eds.), L’art c’est l’art. Neuchâtel, Musée d’ethnographie: 45-60.
- Nicks, Trudy and Tom Hill. 1992. Turning the Page: Forging New Partnerships Between Museums and First Peoples. Ottawa, Assembly of First Nations/Canadian Museums Association.
- Pearce, Susan M. 1995. On Collecting: An Investigation into Collecting in the European Tradition. New York: Routledge.
- –––––. 1998. Collecting in Contemporary Practice. Londres: Sage.
- –––––.1999. “Museums of Anthropology or Museums as Anthropology”. Anthropologica 41-1: 25-34.
- Parezo, Nancy. 1998. “The Formation of Anthropological Archival Records”. In David Kingery (ed.), Learning From Things: Method and Theory of Material Culture Studies. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press: 145-174.
- Peers, Laura. 2000. “Native Americans in Museums”. Anthropology Today 16-6: 8-13.
- Pomian, Krzysztof. 1987. Collectionneurs, amateurs et curieux. Paris: Gallimard.
- Poulot, Dominique. 2002. “Musées et expositions des origines à nos jours”. Sciences humaines (hors-série 37): 52-5.
- Simpson, Moira. 1996. Making Representations: Museums in the Post-Colonial Era. London/New-York: Routledge.
- Sturtevant William C. 1969. “Does Anthropology Need Museums?” Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 82: 619-650.
- Terrel, John. 1991. “Disneyland and the Future of Museum Anthropology”. American Anthropologist 93: 149-153.
- Stocking, George (ed.). 1985. Objects and Others: Essays on Museums and Material Culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Thomas, Nicholas. 1991. Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture and Colonialism in the Pacific. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Turgeon, Laurier. 1997. “The Tale of the Kettle: Odyssey of an Intercultural Object”. Ethnohistory 44 (1): 1-29.