Public-private partnerships can be understood to be instruments for meeting the obligations of the state (things that there has been a strong social consensus that the state ought to do) that are transformed so as to involve private property ownership as a key element in the operation of the instrument. The word partnership is important and not just a euphemism for hiding a privatization (at least it ought not to be). Partnership means a relationship based on common goals where both entities share benefits and contribute resources over the long-term for mutual advantage and out of a sense of commitment. In a design-build-finance-operate (DBFO) public-private partnership, the state agency sponsoring the development hires either a single company (or consortium of companies) to, as the term suggests, meet the full extent of its public obligation by determining how best to meet the obligation, designing and building the necessary infrastructure and then operating it. This paper looks at the development of three DBFO public-private partnerships in and around Vancouver, British Columbia, asking what the likelihood is that the public will benefit from decisions to employ this procurement model. When using a definition of benefit that is broader than simply saving money, it is possible that these projects can provide greater benefits than a traditional public procurement, although the managers of two of the projects will likely face greater difficulties in doing so than the managers of the third one.
Les partenariats public-privé (PPP) peuvent être définis comme des instruments permettant à l’État de remplir ses obligations par le biais d’un rôle accru pour le secteur privé, incluant la propriété privée. L’élément partenarial n’est pas (du moins doit pas être) qu’un euphémisme visant à masquer une dynamique de privatisation. Un véritable partenariat se traduit par une relation mutuellement avantageuse caractérisée par le partage des buts, des objectifs, des ressources, de l’expertise et, bien entendu, des bénéfices à long terme. Dans le cadre d’un projet PPP qui inclue les phases Conception-Construction-Financement-Gestion (CCFG), l’agence de l’État sélectionne la firme privée (ou le consortium de firmes privées) qui sera responsable des obligations découlant de chacune de ces phases. Ce texte se penche sur le développement de trois projets PPP qui incluent les phases CCFG dans la région de Vancouver (Colombie-Britannique), afin d’identifier les bénéfices qui en résulteront pour les citoyens. Dès lors que la notion de bénéfices n’est pas restreinte à sa seule dimension financière, il devient possible que ces projets entraînent des bénéfices plus nombreux et/ou plus substantiels que sous un mode de prestation traditionnel, bien que cette possibilité représente un défi plus grand pour les deux premiers projets que pour le troisième.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
- Akkawi, A.A. 2001. “Sharpen Your Pencils,” Summit Magazine (Special Issue: Focus on Public Private Partnerships) (Fall), accessed online on 30 March 2004 at www.summitconnects.com.
- Arthur Anderson and Enterprise LSE. 2000. Value for Money Drivers in the Private Finance Initiative. London: HM Treasury. Retrieved 23 August 2004.
- Ball, R., M. Heafey and D. King. 2004. “Risk Management and the Private Finance Initiative,” in A. Ghobadian, D. Gallear, N. O’Regan and H. Viney (eds.). Public-Private Partnerships: Policy and Experience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Beato, P. and A. Vives. 1996. “Private-Sector Participation in Infrastructure: Risk, Fiscal, and Efficiency Issues in Public-Private Arrangements for the Provision of Services,” Infrastructure 1(3): 3-14. Re-printed in D. Grimsey and M.K. Lewis (eds.). 2005. The Economics of Public Private Partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Brereton, M and M. Temple. 1999. “The New Public Service Ethos: An Ethical Environment for Government,” Public Administration 77(3): 455-474.
- Brewer, P. and L. Johnson. 2004. Partnering in Practice: New Approaches to PPP Delivery. Toronto: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
- British Columbia Finance Ministry. 2002. Capital Asset Management Framework. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Finance Ministry.
- British Columbia Ministry of Health Services. 2003. News Release: Government Honouring Promise for New Hospital (23 January). Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Health Services.
- British Columbia Ministry of Municipal Affairs. 1999. Public Private Partnership: A Guide for Local Government. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Municipal Affairs.
- British Columbia Ministry of Transportation. 2004. Capital Project Plan: The Sea-to-Sky Highway Improvement project [January 10]. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Transportation.
- British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Partnerships BC. 2004. Sea-to-Sky Highway Improvement Project: Request for Proposals, Instructions to Proponents, Volume 1. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Transportation.
- British Columbia Office of the Premier. 2001. Guidelines for the Core Review. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Office of the Premier.
- British Columbia Task Force on Private Public Partnerships. 1996. Report of the Task Force on Private Public Partnerships: Building Partnerships. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Finance and Corporate Relations.
- Byers, S. 2003. “Full-text of Stephen Byers' speech: The former transport and local government secretary's speech to the Social Market Foundation in London today,” Guardian Unlimited (Manchester and London: The Guardian) Retrieved 09/10, 2005 from http://politics.guardian.co.uk/thinktanks/story/0,10538,969677,00.html
- Calder, P. B. 2004. Approaches to Canadian Infrastructure Financing: Past, Present, and Future. (Toronto: Standard & Poor’s). Retrieved April 21, 2004 from http://www2.standardandpoors.com.
- Campbell, D. and D. Harris. 1993. “Flexibility in Long-term Contractual Relationships: The Role of Cooperation,” Journal of Law & Society 20(2): 166-191. Re-printed in D. Grimsey and M.K. Lewis (eds.). 2005. The Economics of Public Private Partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Campbell, G. and K. Falcon. 2004. Letter to Chair Doug McCallum and Members of the Greater Vancouver Transit Authority Board (Issued with News Release 2004OTP0049-000492 ed.). Victoria, BC: Office of the Premier of British Columbia.
- Canada Line Rapid Transit [sic] Richmond Airport Vancouver Rapid Transit Project. 2006. Canada Line Final Project Report: Competitive Selection Phase. Vancouver: Canada Line Rapid Transit.
- Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships. 2003. The Canadian Case for Hospital PPP Projects. Toronto, ON: Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships.
- Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships. 2005. Responsible PPP Procurement for British Columbia. Toronto, ON: Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships.
- Cohn, D. 2005. “The Public-Private Partnership ‘Fetish’: Moving Beyond the Rhetoric,” Revue Gouvernance, 1(2): 2-24.
- Fraser Health Authority. 2005. Fraser Health Authority Strategic Plan. Surrey, BC: Fraser Health Authority.
- Goldsworthy, Rachel. 2002. Objective Based Government Remains Liberal Target in B.C. Journal of Commerce, 91(92).
- Greater Vancouver Regional District. 1999. Livable Region Strategic Plan. Burnaby, BC: Greater Vancouver Regional District.
- Greater Vancouver Transit Authority. 2004a. News Release: Final TransLink Board Vote Approves RAV Line [1 December]. Burnaby, BC: Greater Vancouver Transit Authority.
- Greater Vancouver Transit Authority. 2004b. News Release: Rapid Transit Expansion [30 June]. Vancouver, BC: Greater Vancouver Transit Authority.
- Grimsey, D. and M.K. Lewis. 2004. Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elger.
- Grout, P. A. Public and Private Discount Rates in Public-Private Partnerships. Economic Journal 113 (486): C62-C68.
- Hall, J. 2005. “Ten Years After: On Aug 11, 1995 3 Died when a Subway Train Rear-Ended another one at Russell Hill Dr.,” Toronto Star (6 August): B1.
- HM Treasury. 2003. PFI: Meeting the Investment Challenge. London: HM Treasury.
- Hotson Bakker Boniface Haden Architects. 2005. Recent Projects: Burnaby Mountain Secondary School. Retrieved 9/1, 2005 from http://www.hotsonbakker.com/bmss.html.
- Jacobsen, P. 2003. Memo from Pat Jacobsen, CEO to the GVTA Board of Directors: Approval of Procurement Strategy and Funding Commitment for Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Rapid Transit. Burnaby, BC: Greater Vancouver Transit Authority.
- Jacobsen, P. and S. Plewes. 2004. Memo to GVTA Board of Directors from Pat Jacobsen, Chief Executive Officer and Sheri Plewes, Vice President Capital Management & Engineering: Richmond Airport Vancouver project - Summary of Best and Final Offer Proposal Stage and Proceeding to Preferred Proponent Stage [26 November for 1 December Board Meeting]. Burnaby, BC: Greater Vancouver Transit Authority.
- Keeler, J. T. S. 1993. “Opening the Window for Reform,” Comparative Political Studies, 25(4), 433-486.
- Keenan, J. 1999. “Read the Fine Print: The Public Sector Accounting Board Takes a Close Look at the Hidden Costs of Government Contractual Arrangements,” CA Magazine (October): 41-42 and 56-57.
- Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
- Knight, A. and I. Fox. 2004. “Why is it so Expensive to Bid for PFI Contracts?” in A. Ghobadian, D. Gallear, N. O’Regan and H. Viney (eds.). Public-Private Partnerships: Policy and Experience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Lee, J. 1989. “Whalley, Richmond ties Announced: Transit to Grow 'n' Grow,” The Vancouver Sun, (31 July): A1.
- Lee, J. 2004. “Victoria Declares RAV Line Dead, Assails Translink Board,” Vancouver Sun, (19 June): A1.
- Leslie, T. 2004. “Only One Bidder Left to Build New Hospital,” Abbotsford Times (10 February): 7.
- Lewis, J. 2004. “A Sound Infrastructure,” Benefits Canada, (February): 17-18.
- Macquarie North America. 2001. Report for the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority [on using public-private partnerships to develop the Richmond-Airport-Vancouver rapid transit line and the new Fraser River crossing] part 1.Vancouver, BC: Macquarie North America.
- McMartin, P. 2003. “RAV Line Follows the Money,” The Vancouver Sun (29 May): A4.
- N.A. Engineering News Record. 2002. “Private-Public Partnerships will have Twists and Turns,” Engineering News Records, (5 June): 64.
- Palmer, V. 2005. “Expanding Expansion of Convention Centre puts New Minister on the Spot,” Vancouver Sun, (7September): A3.
- Palmer, V. 2001. “Campbell's Rule for Ministers: Do it My Way,” The Vancouver Sun (29 June): A14.
- Partnerships BC. 2004. Project Agreement: Abbotsford Regional Hospital and Cancer Care Centre. Vancouver: Partnerships BC.
- Partnerships BC. 2005a. Sea-to-Sky Highway Concession Agreement. Vancouver: Partnerships BC.
- Partnerships BC. 2005b. Project Report: Achieving Value for Money: The Abbotsford Regional Hospital and Cancer Care Centre. Vancouver: Partnerships BC.
- Partnerships BC. 2005c. Project Report: Achieving Value for Money: The Sea-to-Sky Highway Improvement Project. Vancouver: Partnerships BC.
- PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2002. Fraser Valley Health Centre/Eastern Fraser Valley Cancer Center, Public-Private Partnership Review Final Report. Toronto: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
- Professional Association of Residents British Columbia. 2002. Report on the Health Authorities’ Health Services Redesign Plans [23 April]. Vancouver: Professional Association of Residents British Columbia.
- Province of British Columbia Executive Council. 2003. Transcript of the Open Cabinet Meeting of May 30. Victoria, BC: Province of British Columbia Executive Council.
- Richmond Airport Vancouver Rapid Transit Project. 2005. Information Bulletin: Addition of 2nd Avenue Station to the RAV Line [8 April]. Vancouver, BC: Richmond Airport Vancouver Rapid Transit Project.
- Ross, I. 1996. “Better Way: A Year After Fatal Subway Crash, Transit Boss Counting on Plan to Save System,” Globe and Mail (10 August): A1.
- Rouillard, C., É. Montpetit, I. Fortier and A.-G. Gagnon. 2006. Reengineering the State: Toward an Impoverishment of Quebec Governance. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
- Skelton, C. 2004. “RAV Line was Short 'Hundreds of Millions': Project bids far Higher than Translink Budget,” Vancouver Sun, (10 May): A1-A2.
- Taylor, M., K. Barker, B. Callahan, D. Denison, S. Ebanjam and R. Kelly. 2001. Building Better Partnerships: The Final Report of the Commission on Public Private Partnerships. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
- TSI Consultants. 2002. Sea-to-Sky Corridor Travel Demand Study: Final Report. Burnaby, BC: TSI Consultants.
- United Kingdom National Audit Office. 2002. PFI Refinancing Update. London: The Stationery Office.
- Vaillancourt Roseneau, P. 2000. “The Strengths and Weaknesses of Public-Private Policy Partnerships,” in P. Vaillancourt Roseneau (ed.), Public-Private Policy Partnerships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Vancouver 2010 Olympic Bid Committee. 2002. Vancouver 2010 Bid Book Volume 3. Vancouver: Vancouver 2010 Olympic Bid Committee.
- Vining, A.R., A.E. Boardman and F. Poschman. 2005. “Public-Private Partnerships in the United States and Canada: There are no Free Lunches,” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 7(3): 199-220.
- Willcocks, P. 2001. “The Cutting Edge of Campbell's ‘New Era’,” The Vancouver Sun (3 July): A10.